1. Feasibility and acceptability of the HOLObalance telerehabilitation system compared with standard care for older adults at risk of falls: the HOLOBalance assessor blinded pilot randomised controlled study.
- Author
-
Pavlou, Marousa, Flavell, Carol Ann, Gourtani, Fariba Mostajeran, Nikitas, Christos, Kikidis, Dimitris, Bibas, Athanasios, Gatsios, Dimitris, Tsakanikas, Vassilis, Fotiadis, Dimitrios I, Koutsouris, Dimitrios, Steinicke, Frank, Walz, Isabelle Daniela, Maurer, Christoph, Papadopoulou, Sofia, Tsoukatos, Michalis, Pardalis, Athanasios, and Bamiou, Doris-Eva
- Subjects
PATIENT compliance ,THERAPEUTICS ,PILOT projects ,STATISTICAL sampling ,BLIND experiment ,TELEREHABILITATION ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,FUNCTIONAL status ,DIAGNOSIS ,GAIT in humans ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,HOME rehabilitation ,PATIENT satisfaction ,ADVERSE health care events ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,ACCIDENTAL falls ,POSTURAL balance ,AUGMENTED reality ,HOLOGRAPHY ,COGNITION ,EVALUATION ,OLD age - Abstract
Background Falls have high socioeconomic costs. Information and communication technologies may support provision and monitoring of multisensory (MSR) physiotherapy programmes. The HOLOBalance platform used augmented reality holograms to provide patient-centred, individualised MSR. Objectives To determine the platform's safety, acceptability and feasibility, investigate functional gait and dynamic balance benefits and provide data for a definitive trial. Design and setting Single-blinded pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. Interventions were conducted at clinical sites or participants' homes in three European countries. Participants Community-dwelling older adults (median age 73 years; 64.2% female) at risk of falls were enrolled (May 2020-August 2021). Methods Participants were randomised to an 8-week clinic or home-based telerehabilitation MSR or OTAGO (control group) programme. Compliance, satisfaction, and adverse events determined feasibility. Clinical outcomes, assessed (blinded) within one-week prior to and post-intervention, included functional gait assessment (FGA), Mini BESTest and cognitive function. Results Randomisation to completion rate was 76.15% with 109 participants recruited (n = 289 screened). Drop-out rate was similar between groups. Adverse events were reported (n = 3) in the control group. Sixty-nine percent would recommend the HOLOBalance intervention. Findings were similar for the home and clinic-based arms of each intervention; data was combined for analysis. FGA (95%CI [1.63, 4.19]) and Mini-BESTest (95%CI [1.46, 3.93]) showed greater improvement in the HOLOBalance group with a clinically meaningful change of 4/30 noted for the FGA. Conclusions HOLObalance was feasible to implement and acceptable to older adults at risk of falls, with FGA and Mini-BEST improvements exceeding those for the OTAGO programme. A definitive trial is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF