1. Indias COVID-19 social assistance package and its impact on the agriculture sector
- Author
-
Ashok K. Mishra, Deepak Varshney, Shahidur Rashid, Anjani Kumar, and Pramod Kumar Joshi
- Subjects
Cash transfers ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Context (language use) ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Fungibility ,Livelihood ,01 natural sciences ,Agricultural economics ,Procurement ,Agriculture ,Transfer payment ,Cash ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Business ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,media_common - Abstract
Context CVOID-19 induced significant economic and social disruptions in India. Rural households, including smallholders, were affected by loss in migrant income, livelihood and farm and non-farm incomes. During this lockdown, the Indian government enacted several emergency legislations to provide direct and indirect relief to workers and households. India’s COVID-19 social assistance package, namely, PM-GKY, announced in March 2020, was designed to provide immediate relief to the vulnerable population. The PM-GKY provided cash direct benefit transfers (DBT) and in-kind supports (IKS) through existing schemes. Objectives This study examines the impact of India’s government assistance package (known as Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana or PM-GKY), announced immediately after the COVID-19 lockdown, on the procurement of agricultural inputs for the upcoming farming season. Methods The study uses a quasi-experimental method and survey data from 1,789 smallholder households in three northern Indian states (Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh). Results The result suggests that the fungibility of funds received under the government transfer package was significant in alleviating credit constraints and increasing agricultural investments in agricultural inputs. The farmers who received benefits from the PM-GKY scheme spent significantly more on the procurement of seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides. Conclusions The disbursement of cash transfers in the three states showed that emergency relief packages had reached the vulnerable sections of Indian society. Overall, 89-94% of households benefited from direct cash transfers. Perhaps lower transaction costs, minimal leakages, and immediate delivery make a strong case for direct cash transfers. The above advantages facilitate the provision of relief to a large proportion of vulnerable sections of Indian society in a short period.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF