Search

Continuing progress in machine learning (ML) has led to significant advancements in agricultural tasks. Due to its strong ability to extract high-dimensional features from fruit images, deep learning (DL) is widely used in fruit detection and automatic harvesting. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) in particular have demonstrated the ability to attain accuracy and speed levels comparable to those of humans in some fruit detection and automatic harvesting fields. This paper presents a comprehensive overview and review of fruit detection and recognition based on DL for automatic harvesting from 2018 up to now. We focus on the current challenges affecting fruit detection performance for automatic harvesting: the scarcity of high-quality fruit datasets, fruit detection of small targets, fruit detection in occluded and dense scenarios, fruit detection of multiple scales and multiple species, and lightweight fruit detection models. In response to these challenges, we propose feasible solutions and prospective future development trends. Future research should prioritize addressing these current challenges and improving the accuracy, speed, robustness, and generalization of fruit vision detection systems, while reducing the overall complexity and cost. This paper hopes to provide a reference for follow-up research in the field of fruit detection and recognition based on DL for automatic harvesting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) has been widely accepted as the "Queen of Fruits". It has been identified as having high levels of vitamin C and antioxidants that are beneficial for maintaining cardiovascular health and maintaining blood sugar levels. The implementation of advanced techniques like precision agriculture (PA) is crucial for enhancing production compared to conventional farming methods. In recent years, the successful application of deep learning models was represented by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in a variety of disciplines of computer vision (CV). Due to the dearth of a comprehensive and detailed discussion on the application of deep learning to strawberry cultivation, a particular review of recent technologies is needed. This paper provides an overview of recent advancements in strawberry cultivation utilizing Deep Learning (DL) techniques. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the most up-to-date techniques and methodologies used in this field by examining recent research. It also discusses the recent advanced variants of the DL model, along with a fundamental overview of CNN architecture. In addition, techniques for fine-tuning DL models have been covered. Besides, various strawberry-planting-related datasets were examined in the literature, and the limitations of using research models for real-time research have been discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rice, the world's most extensively cultivated cereal crop, serves as a staple food and energy source for over half of the global population. A variety of abiotic and biotic factors such as weather conditions, soil quality, temperature, insects, pathogens, and viruses can greatly impact the quantity and quality of rice grains. Studies have established that plant infections have a significant impact on rice crops, resulting in substantial financial losses in agriculture. To accurately diagnose and manage the diseases affecting rice plants, plant pathologists are seeking efficient and reliable methods. Traditional disease detection techniques, employed by farmers, involve time-consuming visual inspections and result in inadequate farming practices. With advancements in agricultural technology, the identification of pathogenic organisms in rice plants has become significantly more manageable through techniques such as machine learning and deep learning, which are receiving significant attention in crop disease research. In this paper, we used the transfer learning approach on 15 pre-trained CNN models for the automatic identification of Rice leave diseases. Results showed that the InceptionV3 model is outperforming with an average accuracy of 99.64% with Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and Specificity as 98.23, 98.21, 98.20, and 99.80, and the AlexNet model resulted in poor performance with average accuracy of 97.35% among others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]