Search

We evaluated the safety of CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL)-guided treatment interruptions (GTI) and determined predictors of duration of treatment interruption.Chronically HIV-1-infected adults with sustained CD4 cell counts500 cells/microl and pVL50 copies/ml were randomly assigned to either continue with standard antiretroviral therapy (control group, n = 101) or to interrupt therapy aimed at maintaining CD4 cell counts350 cells/microl and pVL100,000 copies/ml (GTI group, n = 100). Both groups were followed for 2 years.There were no AIDS-defining illnesses or deaths in either group. Compared to controls, subjects interrupting therapy reduced treatment exposure by 67%, but suffered significantly more adverse events related to the intake of medication or to therapy interruption [relative hazard, 2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-4.49; P0.001), mainly due to an excess in mononucleosis-like symptoms. While GTI subjects demonstrated improvements in the psychosocial spheres of quality of life and pain reporting, GTI had no effect on the physical aspects of quality of life. Although both groups had a similar hazard for developing CD4 cell count200 cells/microl; at least 10% of subjects on GTI had CD4 cell counts350 cells/microl at every time point. Drug resistance mutations were detected in 36% of subjects but were selected de novo only in subjects interrupting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy. Lower CD4 cell count nadir, higher set-point pVL and prior exposure to suboptimal regimens were all independent predictors of the need to reinitiate treatment.Overall, GTI were not as safe as continuing therapy. Despite achieving some improvements in quality of life, GTI did not reduce the overall rate of management-related adverse events.

Structured treatment interruption strategies may help overcome problems of highly active antiretroviral therapy, but might also represent a cause of stress. We present data that indicate a psychological benefit from structured treatment interruption. Although some disturbances appear at the resumption of therapy, no definitive problems are found that preclude such therapeutic approaches from a psychological perspective. However, a close follow-up of patients during interruption periods is advisable to avoid difficulties reported at treatment resumption presenting a risk to patients' health.

To investigate the virological and immunological impact of a structured treatment interruption (STI) in a cohort of HIV-1 chronically infected patients with a further long-lasting effective virus suppression.Twelve HIV-1 chronically infected adults who had maintained viral suppression (20 copies/ml) for more than 2 years, as well as a CD4:CD8 ratio1 for a median time of 22 months, were included in the study. Participants interrupted their antiretroviral treatment during a maximum period of 30 days or until a viral load rebound3000 copies/ml was detected. The same prior antiretroviral regimen was resumed after STI. Kinetics of plasma viral rebound was evaluated every 2 days during the treatment interruption period. Flow cytometry and cell proliferation assays were performed before and after STI. Genotypic resistance was assessed at the time of treatment resumption.No adverse events occurred during the interruption period. In two patients no viral rebound was detected after 30 days of treatment interruption. In the remaining 10 patients, viral load became detectable (20 copies/ml) at a median time of 14 days after treatment interruption. Afterwards, viral load increased exponentially with a mean t1/2 of 1.6 days. Treatment was successfully resumed in all patients. No resistance-conferring mutations associated with the pre-interruption antiretroviral regimen were detected. The percentage of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes did not vary during the STI period; however, the level of expression of T-cell activation antigen CD38 on CD8 T cells increased significantly in response to viral rebound. Four patients gained T-helper cell responses to recall antigens (tuberculin and tetanus toxoid), two of who developed an HIV-specific response to p24.STI in chronically HIV-1-infected patients is not associated with reductions in CD4 T lymphocytes or to clinical complications in this group of patients after 2 years of effective plasma viral suppression. Viral load rebounds in most but not all patients, without evidence of selection of resistance-conferring mutations. Thereafter, viraemia can be effectively controlled by antiretroviral agent reintroduction. HIV-specific T-helper cell responses may be achieved after one cycle of treatment interruption suggesting some degree of immune-stimulation. These data do not discard consecutive cycles of STI as a therapeutic strategy to boost HIV-specific immunity in order to maintain viral replication under effective control.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of once-daily didanosine and nevirapine plus twice-daily stavudine versus twice-daily administration of all three drugs. Methods: This open-label, randomized, multicentre study enrolled 94 antiretroviral-naive patients with chronic HIV infection, CD4+ cell counts > 500 × 10 6 cells/l, and viral loads > 5000 copies/ml. Patients were treated with either 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 400 mg didanosine (once daily) and 400 mg nevirapine (once daily) or 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 200 mg didanosine (twice daily) and 200 mg nevirapine (twice daily). Results: After 12 months, 68% of patients who received twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine had viral loads < 200 copies/ml in the intention-to-treat and 79% in the on-treatment analysis, respectively. The corresponding values for patients treated with didanosine and nevirapine, taken once-daily, were 73 and 85%. The percentages of patients in each group with viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months were 40% (once daily ) and 45% (twice daily) for the intention-to-treat analysis. Five of 11 patients (45%) with plasma viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months had detectable virus in tonsillar tissue. Genotypic resistance to nevirapine was noted in seven of the 14 patients with detectable viral load at month 12. Mean changes in CD4+ cell counts for patients treated with stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine were 154 and 132 × 10 6 cells/I, respectively. Treatment was interrupted due to adverse events in seven patients (8%) (four who received once-daily didanosine and nevirapine and three treated with twice-daily doses). Conclusions: The combination of twice-daily stavudine plus once-daily didanosine and nevirapine was as safe and well tolerated as twice-daily administration of all three agents. Both regimens were equally effective in reducing viral loads and in increasing CD4+ cell counts.

Objective: To assess HIV-1 RNA levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and their potential correlation with plasma viral load and central nervous system (CNS) HIV-1 infection markers in stable asymptomatic patients with a CD4 T cell count > 500 × 10 6 cells/l. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients screened for two trials were eligible for lumbar puncture assessment. At day 0, simultaneous samples of CSF and plasma were obtained and levels of total proteins, albumin, IgG, antibodies against HIV-1 p24 antigen, HIV-1 RNA (using the polymerase chain technique) and white cells were measured. Results: The integrity of the blood-brain barrier was preserved (albumin index ≥ 7) in 59 out of 70 patients (84%). Intrathecal production of antibodies against HIV-1 p24 antigen was demonstrated in 55 out of 70 individuals (78%). Viral load in CSF was significantly lower than plasma values (3.13 ± 0.95 versus 4.53 ± 0.53, P = 0.0001). HIV-1 RNA was not detected in CSF in only three of the 70 patients (4%). Overall, there was a significant correlation between plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA levels (r = 0.43, P = 0.0001); however, in 29 patients (41%) there were significant differences (> 1.5 log 10 copies/ml) between the viral loads in plasma and CSF. In the multivariate analysis, a high level of protein and white cells in CSF, but not the HIV-1 RNA plasma level, were factors independently associated with a higher level of HIV-1 RNA in CSF (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: HIV-1 RNA can be detected almost always in CSF of asymptomatic patients in early stages of HIV-1 infection including those with a preserved integrity of the blood-brain barrier. The important discrepancies between plasma and CSF viral load, and the independent association between CSF abnormalities and CSF viral load, support the hypothesis of local production of HIV-1.

To address the question of whether individuals with chronic HIV-1 infection have a stable viral load set-point and to assess the influence of host and viral factors on the evolution of viral load in a subset of stable asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load below 5000 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell count above 500 x 10(6)/l.Medical visits were performed at least every 6 months including routine blood analysis, viral load and CD4+ T-cell count. HIV-1 RNA was measured in frozen (-70 degrees C) plasma samples using PCR. Patients were classified into three groups according to baseline viral load: group A,200 copies/ml (undetectable); group B, 201-2000 copies/ml; group C, 2001-5000 copies/ml. A survival analysis and a Cox regression model were performed to assess the influence of viral and host factors in the increase of baseline viral load. The endpoint was the time to increase viral load to a stable level0.5 log10 copies/ml above baseline viral load in groups B and C and to a stable detectable viral load (200 copies/ml) in group A.A cohort of 114 patients with viral load below 5000 copies/ml was followed for a median of 12 months (6-42 months). Overall, 22 (19%) out of 114 patients had an increase0.5 log10 copies/ml of baseline viral load. Baseline viral load increased in two (5%) out of 37 patients in group A, four (12%) out of 33 patients in group B, and 16 (36%) out of 44 patients in group C (survival analysis, P0.002). Patients of group C had a eightfold higher risk of increasing baseline viral load than patients in the other two groups pooled together (hazards ratio, 8.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-38; P = 0.006). Patients with an increase of viral load to the virological endpoint had a threefold higher risk of decreasing baseline CD4+ T-cell counts100 x 10(6)/I than patients with stable viral load (hazards ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-14; P = 0.03).In our cohort of chronically HIV-1-infected asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load5000 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count500 x 10(6)/l, a true viral load set-point did not seem to exist. Patients with baseline viral load of 2000-5000 copies/ml had an eightfold higher risk of increasing the level of viral load than patients with a baseline viral load below 2000 copies/ml.

Patients with HIV infection were studied to assess the efficacy of octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, in the long-term management of refractory diarrhoea. Dosage of subcutaneous octreotide was increased progressively at 48 h intervals from 150 to 300, 750 and 1500 micrograms/day according to response. Twenty-nine patients, 21 with Cryptosporidium enteritis, one with Isospora belli enteritis and seven with no identifiable pathogen were selected for the study; four of these were excluded from the study because of death during the first month (two cases), abdominal pain and acute pancreatitis (one case each). Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Ten patients (four with Cryptosporidium enteritis, five without an identifiable pathogen and one with I. belli enteritis) achieved a complete response (40%) and nine cases (all with cryptosporidial enteritis) had a partial response (36%). Patients with higher weight and Karnofsky performance status and non-cryptosporidial enteritis had a better response to treatment. Mean durations of treatment and response were 4.2 +/- 4.2 and 4.4 +/- 4.5 months, respectively. In the absence of specific agents for cryptosporidial enteritis and HIV enteropathy, octreotide was found to be useful in the management of chronic diarrhoea in AIDS patients.