1. Cervical cancer screening intervals and management for women living with HIV: a risk benchmarking approach
- Author
-
Teresa M. Darragh, Joel Milam, Sadeep Shrestha, Joel M. Palefsky, Lisa Flowers, Lisa Rahangdale, Gypsyamber D'Souza, Margaret A. Fischl, Howard D. Strickler, L. Stewart Massad, Marla J. Keller, Christine Colie, Christopher B. Pierce, Hilary A. Robbins, and Howard Minkoff
- Subjects
cervical cancer ,screening guidelines ,Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,HIV Infections ,Cervical cancer screening ,medicine.disease_cause ,Medical and Health Sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia ,Immunology and Allergy ,Mass Screening ,benchmarking ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Disease management (health) ,risk ,Cancer ,Cervical cancer ,education.field_of_study ,Obstetrics ,Histocytochemistry ,Disease Management ,Benchmarking ,Health Services ,Biological Sciences ,Middle Aged ,Infectious Diseases ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,HIV/AIDS ,Female ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,precancer ,Immunology ,Population ,Cytological Techniques ,MEDLINE ,cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ,Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ,03 medical and health sciences ,Clinical Research ,Virology ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Gynecology ,business.industry ,Prevention ,Carcinoma ,Psychology and Cognitive Sciences ,HIV ,medicine.disease ,Squamous Cell ,Sexually Transmitted Infections ,business ,CD4(+) - Abstract
ObjectiveWe suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.DesignWe compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population.MethodsWe applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000-2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)].ResultsAverage 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks') were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4 greater than 500 cells/μl and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk = 1.0%) or CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl (1-year risk = 1.1%); and a 6-12-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk = 8.2% if CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl; 10.4% if CD4 cell count = 350-499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 6-12 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk = 16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl (2-year risk = 0.98%).ConclusionsCurrent cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
- Published
- 2017