Search

HIV status disclosure can reduce transmission risks and improve care engagement. Individuals may have strong feelings about HIV disclosure even prior to diagnosis. We assessed willingness to disclose a positive HIV status among pregnant women and their male partners awaiting routine HIV testing during antenatal care in Tanzania (n = 939). Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with willingness to disclose to one's inner circle (partner/family member) and outer circle (friend/neighbor) in the event of an HIV diagnosis. Almost all (93%) were willing to disclose to at least one person; participants were more willing to disclose to their inner circle (91%) vs outer circle (52%). Individuals with some form of employment, more stigmatizing attitudes of social distancing of PLWH, greater anticipated HIV stigma, more perceived social support, and prior contact with someone living with HIV were more likely to disclose to their inner circles. Individuals who were older, male, and who had higher levels of perceived social support were more willing to disclose to their outer circle. These findings increase the understanding of the intra- and interpersonal factors that influence HIV disclosure decisions. Tailored pre- and post- HIV test counseling are needed to facilitate social support and overcome barriers to disclosure if they test positive for HIV.

HIV stigmatizing attitudes are embedded in social context, making it important to develop culturally specific tools for accurate measurement. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the HIV Stigmatizing Attitudes Scale (HSAS) in Moshi, Tanzania. Items were adapted based on a scale developed by Visser et al. which was one of the first to measure HIV stigmatizing attitudes in the general population (i.e., people not living with HIV). Items were translated into Swahili and modified with iterative feedback. The HSAS was administered to participants (N = 1494) in an HIV stigma reduction intervention study at two antenatal care clinics in Moshi, Tanzania. The HSAS was found to have strong domain coherence and high reliability based on Cronbach’s alpha, Omega 6 coefficient values, and the composite reliability coefficient, and high validity based on content-oriented evidence, relations to other variables, and response process. Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure (Moral Judgment and Interpersonal Distancing), consistent with the original Visser scale. The HSAS provides a robust way to measure HIV stigma in the Tanzanian context and can be culturally adapted to other settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10461-021-03506-3.

HIV stigma is a persistent barrier to curbing the spread of HIV and improving quality of life for people living with HIV. We developed and pilot tested Maisha, an HIV stigma reduction intervention in antenatal care (ANC) with two objectives: 1) among individuals living with HIV, reduce internalized and anticipated HIV stigma, with subsequent improvements in HIV care engagement, and 2) among individuals who are HIV-seronegative, reduce HIV stigmatizing attitudes. We enrolled and baselined 1039 women and 492 male partners presenting to a first ANC appointment and randomized them to standard of care or the Maisha intervention. All women living with HIV (WLHIV) and a subset of HIV-negative participants completed a 3-month follow-up assessment. Participation in the three Maisha sessions was high (99.6%, 92.8%, 89.3%), and nearly all participants noted satisfaction with the intervention content (99.8%) and counselor (99.8%). Among 55 WLHIV, care engagement outcomes did not differ by condition. Among 293 HIV-negative participants, Maisha participants had significantly greater reductions in the moral judgment sub-scale of the stigma attitudes measure (p