Search

Objective: To determine the short-term effects of using genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) with expert advice in the management of patients failing on a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors., Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial., Setting: Multicenter community-based clinical trials network., Patients: One-hundred and fifty-three HIV-infected adults with a threefold or greater rise in plasma HIV-1 RNA on at least 16 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy., Interventions: Randomization was either to a GART group, where genotype interpretation and suggested regimens were provided to clinicians, or to a no-GART group, where treatment choices were made without such input., Main Outcomes Measures: Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization. The primary endpoint was change in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline to the average of the 4 and 8 week levels., Results: The average baseline CD4 cell count was 230 x 10(6) cells/l and the median HIV-1 RNA was 28,085 copies/ml. At entry, 82 patients were failing on regimens containing indinavir, 51 on nelfinavir, 11 on ritonavir, and nine on saquinavir. HIV-1 RNA, averaged at 4 and 8 weeks, decreased by 1.19 log10 for the 78 GART patients and -0.61 log10 for the 75 no-GART patients (treatment difference: -0.53 log, 95% confidence interval, -0.77 to -0.29; P = 0.00001). Overall, the best virologic responses occurred in patients who received three or more drugs to which their HIV-1 appeared to be susceptible., Conclusion: In patients failing triple drug therapy, GART with expert advice was superior to no-GART as measured by short-term viral load responses.

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) protects against four central nervous system (CNS) diseases in HIV-1-infected individuals., Study Population and Design: The study population of 9404 subjects included participants in Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) protocols who were enrolled between September 1990 and September 1998. This was an observational study., Methods: Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks for predictors of four central nervous system diseases. Covariates included occurrence of Kaposi's sarcoma, occurrence of other opportunistic infections or malignancies, baseline CD4+ count, and other baseline characteristics., Results: Among the 5944 participants without progression to AIDS at entry, 451 developed a CNS disease. The adjusted relative risk of any CNS disease for those who developed Kaposi's sarcoma versus those who did not develop any AIDS-defining event was 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-2.03; P = 0.06]. In contrast, the adjusted relative risk of any CNS disease for those with Kaposi's sarcoma versus those with some other non-Kaposi's sarcoma AIDS-defining event was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.24-0.57; P < 0.0001). Among the 3460 participants with progression to AIDS at entry, the adjusted relative risk of any CNS disease for those with Kaposi's sarcoma versus those with some other non-Kaposi's sarcoma AIDS-defining event was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.40-1.25; P = 0.23)., Conclusions: Our analyses indicate that the risk of CNS disease associated with Kaposi's sarcoma depends strongly on the reference or control group chosen. When compared to individuals with other non-Kaposi's sarcoma AIDS-defining diseases, Kaposi's sarcoma is associated with a lower risk of CNS disease in HIV-1 positive individuals. However, when compared to individuals with no AIDS-defining disease or with a similarly mild AIDS-defining disease such as invasive candidiasis, Kaposi's sarcoma is associated with an equivalent risk of CNS disease.

Objective: Evaluate safety and efficacy of oral ganciclovir (GCV) for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in HIV-infected persons at high risk for CMV disease., Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in primary care clinics and private practice offices specializing in the care of people with HIV. Interventions were oral GCV (1000 mg three times/day) or placebo. Protocol amendment allowed switch to open-label oral GCV. Main outcome measures were confirmed CMV retinal or gastrointestinal mucosal disease, and death. The study enrolled 994 people co-infected with CMV and HIV, with at least one CD4 count recorded < 100 x 10(6) cells/l., Results: At study completion (15 months median follow-up), CMV event rates in the oral GCV and control groups were 13.1 and 14.6 per 100 person years, respectively, a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-1.27; P = 0.6]. At protocol amendment event rates were 12.7 and 15.0, respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56-1.30; P = 0.45). At study completion, event rates for death were 26.6 and 32.0 (HR, 0.84; P = 0.09), and at protocol amendment were 18.9 and 19.6 (HR, 0.95; P = 0.78), respectively. At protocol amendment for the CMV endpoint, the oral GCV treatment effect was associated with baseline use of didanosine (ddI). For patients taking ddI at randomization, HR was 7.48 (P = 0.02). For patients not taking ddI, HR was 0.62 (P = 0.04). These HR were statistically different (P = 0.0006)., Conclusions: In our study, 3 g/day oral GCV did not significantly reduce CMV disease incidence, but there was a suggestion of a death-rate reduction. Furthermore, results suggest that oral GVC decreased risk of CMV disease in patients not prescribed ddI, and increased risk in those prescribed ddI. For the CMV endpoint, our study differs markedly from the only similar study, although for the death endpoint, a combined analysis of studies indicated significant reduction in death rate.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of didanosine and zalcitabine in patients who could not tolerate zidovudine or who had failed to respond adequately., Patients and Methods: A multicentre, randomly allocated, open-label clinical trial was set up with 230 patients treated with didanosine and 237 treated with zalcitabine. All had previously been treated unsuccessfully with zidovudine. The patients were followed for at least 1 year, with an average of 16 months., Results: Disease progression or death occurred in 157 patients taking didanosine and 152 taking zalcitabine. There appeared to be a slight trend in favour of survival in the latter group., Conclusions: There is an urgent need for more effective and better tolerated antiretroviral agents in the treatment of HIV infection. Zalcitabine is at least as effective as didanosine and may provide a survival advantage in patients treated unsuccessfully with zidovudine.