Search

Current guidelines specify that visit intervals with viral monitoring should not exceed 6 months for HIV patients. Yet, gaps in care exceeding 6 months are common. In an observational cohort using US patients, we examined the association between gap length and changes in viral load status and sought to determine the length of the gap at which significant increases in viral load occur. We identified patients with gaps in care greater than 6 months from 6399 patients from six US HIV clinics. Gap strata were >6 to <7, 7 to <8, 8 to <9, 9 to <12, and ≥12 months, with viral load measurements matched to the opening and closing dates for the gaps. We examined visit gap lengths in association with two viral load measurements: continuous (log 10 viral load at gap opening and closing) and dichotomous (whether patients initially suppressed but lost viral suppression by close of the care gap). Viral load increases were nonsignificant or modest when gap length was <9 months, corresponding to 10% or fewer patients who lost viral suppression. For gaps ≥12 months, there was a significant increase in viral load as well as a much larger loss of viral suppression (in 23% of patients). Detrimental effects on viral load after a care gap were greater in young patients, black patients, and those without private health insurance. On average, shorter gaps in care were not detrimental to patient viral load status. HIV primary care visit intervals of 6 to 9 months for select patients may be appropriate.

We report a case of gonococcal meningitis diagnosed by DNA amplification. A 47-year old man presented with a 4-day history of asymmetric painful swelling of his ankles and wrists, and skin rash. He had sex with men only but was HIV negative. Headache and photophobia led to a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination that revealed meningitis. Cultures were negative but we detected Neisseria gonorrhoeae in his urine and CSF using a GC/chlamydia DNA amplification assay. The patient was discharged without sequela after 14 days of intravenous ceftriaxone.

The study aims were to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of sexual risk behaviors and urethral sexually transmitted disease (STD) among males entering care for HIV infection and to examine if sildenafil prescriptions are associated with potentially transmitting sexual risk behavior (PTSRB). The research design included (1) self-administered questionnaire of symptoms of sexually transmitted infection (STI), number of recent sex partners, unprotected sexual risk behaviors, use of drugs/alcohol during sex, and HIV disclosure; (2) urine gonorrhea/chlamydia polymerase chain reaction (PCR); and (3) record review for sildenafil prescriptions. A PTSRB was defined as insertive anal, vaginal, or oral sex without a condom. Between March 2001 and March 2002, 413 entrants were surveyed. The prevalence of positive urine PCR among those with and without urethral symptoms was 16.7% and 2.4%, respectively. Fifty-one percent met criteria for PTSRB during the preceding month. Those reporting PTSRB were more likely to report multiple partners. In a multiple logistic regression model, the following were significant (p < 0.05) predictors of PTSRB: drug or alcohol use during sex; white race; only male partners, and sildenafil use. Drug use during sex was associated both with more sex partners and more sexual risk behaviors. Always disclosing HIV status was associated with fewer partners. There was a high prevalence of PTSRB among HIV-infected males entering care. Men who have sex with men (MSM), white race, drug/alcohol use during sex, and sildenafil use were independent risk factors. PTSRB was associated with having multiple partners. Physicians should discuss risk behaviors before prescribing sildenafil.