Search

The macaque model of repeated SHIV exposures is increasingly used as a preclinical tool to evaluate biomedical HIV intervention strategies. It is unclear whether multiple virus exposures induce immune responses in macaques, as documented in uninfected individuals repeatedly exposed to HIV. We here address whether repeated, rectal SHIV(SF162P3) exposures lead to systemic T cell activation in 12 rhesus macaques, and whether this is associated with increased infection resistance. Eight macaques became systemically infected after 2-7 exposures, three macaques were less susceptible (infection after 10-12 exposures), and one macaque remained uninfected after 14 exposures. PBMCs were retrospectively monitored for increases in T cell activation by analyzing the proportion of CD8(+) T cells, recently activated or proliferated T cells (markers CD38, Ki67), a marker for cytotoxicity (granzyme B), or T cell-produced plasma cytokines (IFN-gamma, RANTES, IL-2). Repeated virus exposures did not induce sustained, potent, or diverse T cell responses prior to systemic infection. Some changes occurred in the analyzed parameters during repeated virus exposures, but similar T cell activities were also observed in five SHIV-unexposed control macaques. Thus, we found no evidence that delayed infection or resistance to infection was associated with systemic, long-lasting, protective T cell responses to repeated rectal virus exposures. Our results provide further insights into the repeat exposure macaque model. We find that this model can be used for testing biomedical prevention strategies without concern of eliciting a systemic vaccination effect.

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs constitutes a promising strategy for HIV prevention. Potent PrEP regimens with reverse transcriptase inhibitors can prevent detectable SHIV infection in a repeated low-dose macaque model that resembles human transmission, supporting plans to quickly move this approach into human trials. However, the possibility remains that extremely low levels of virus replication could nonetheless occur during PrEP and seed viral reservoirs in tissues. Therefore, seemingly protected macaques may harbor occult virus that may be initially contained by cytotoxic T cells, but could emerge later. To explore this possibility, we studied whether CD8(+) cells suppress viremia in four rhesus macaques apparently protected by daily or intermittent Truvada (FTC and tenofovir) during 14 low-dose, rectal SHIV(SF162P3) challenges and during a subsequent drug washout period. CD8(+) cells were efficiently ablated with antibodies in these and two additional control macaques that were previously infected but had reached undetectable virus set points. During 4 weeks of follow-up, all four macaques remained free of plasma viremia and provirus in blood lymphocytes. In contrast, plasma viremia resurged to 10(6) to 10(7) copies per milliliter within 2 weeks in both control macaques. Thus, these results indicate that the undetectable viremia in the PrEP-protected macaques was not due to CD8(+) cells that were containing a low-level infection. Rather, the PrEP treatment created conditions in which infection was prevented, eliminated, or controlled by unknown mechanisms. These data provide important information for PrEP usage to prevent HIV transmission, and fully support the continued pursuit of PrEP prevention measures in humans.