1. A comparison of GRT and CxRT cryogenic temperature sensors over the 1 K to 27 K temperature range.
- Author
-
Courts, Scott and Courts, Brian
- Subjects
- *
RESISTANCE thermometers , *GOVERNMENT laboratories , *THERMOMETERS , *QUALITY standards , *GERMANIUM , *TEMPERATURE sensors - Abstract
The ability of a national standards laboratory to disseminate a temperature scale relies entirely on the stability of available secondary temperature standards. For many years, germanium resistance thermometers (GRTs) were the accepted secondary thermometer of choice below 27.5 K. Rhodium-iron resistance thermometers (RIRTs) have supplanted their use in many standards laboratories, but GRTs are still preferred in some applications due to their smaller size and high sensitivity. Following a trend over the past few decades, high quality thermometer standards for the cryogenic temperature range, including GRTs and RIRTs, have become harder to both produce and procure. Currently, outside of national standards laboratories work, the 1 K to 27 K temperature is most often served by Cernox® resistance thermometers (CxRTs). This work examines historical data to compare GRT and CxRT thermometers' performance over the 1 K to 27 K temperature range. In short term stability tests at 4.2 K, data show that GRTs are stable to the ±0.5 mK level while CxRTs are stable to the ±0.75 mK level. Over extended periods of repeated thermal cycling to room temperature, GRTs remain stable to about ±2 mK below 10 K and ±5 mK above 10 K. While the average stability of a test group of CxRTs is on par with the GRT stability, the individual device stability has greater variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF