Search

Automated Cardiac Magnetic Resonance segmentation serves as a crucial tool for the evaluation of cardiac function, facilitating faster clinical assessments that prove advantageous for both practitioners and patients alike. Recent studies have predominantly concentrated on delineating structures on short-axis orientation, placing less emphasis on long-axis representations due to the intricate nature of structures in the latter. Taking these consideration into account, we present a robust hierarchy-based augmentation strategy coupled with the compact and fast Efficient-Net (ENet) architecture for the automated segmentation of two-chamber and four-chamber Cine-MRI images. We observed an average Dice improvement of 0.99% on the two-chamber images and of 2.15% on the four-chamber images, and an average Hausdorff distance improvement of 21.3% on the two-chamber images and of 29.6% on the four-chamber images. The practical viability of our approach was validated by computing clinical metrics such as the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volume (LVC). We observed acceptable biases, with a +2.81% deviation on the LVEF for the two-chamber images and a +0.11% deviation for the four-chamber images.

Automated Cardiac Magnetic Resonance segmentation serves as a crucial tool for the evaluation of cardiac function, facilitating faster clinical assessments that prove advantageous for both practitioners and patients alike. Recent studies have predominantly concentrated on delineating structures on short-axis orientation, placing less emphasis on long-axis representations due to the intricate nature of structures in the latter. Taking these consideration into account, we present a robust hierarchy-based augmentation strategy coupled with the compact and fast Efficient-Net (ENet) architecture for the automated segmentation of two-chamber and four-chamber Cine-MRI images. We observed an average Dice improvement of 0.99% on the two-chamber images and of 2.15% on the four-chamber images, and an average Hausdorff distance improvement of 21.3% on the two-chamber images and of 29.6% on the four-chamber images. The practical viability of our approach was validated by computing clinical metrics such as the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volume (LVC). We observed acceptable biases, with a +2.81% deviation on the LVEF for the two-chamber images and a +0.11% deviation for the four-chamber images. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]