Search

Background: Systemic inflammation is a driving force for the development of hepatic encephalopathy and recent studies demonstrated that elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) serum levels are associated with the presence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis., Aim: To test the hypothesis that IL-6 is a suitable marker to identify patients with liver cirrhosis at high risk for the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy., Methods: 201 patients were included into this prospective cohort study and were followed for a mean time of 322 days. Covert hepatic encephalopathy was diagnosed according to the West-Haven criteria (hepatic encephalopathy grade 1) and with the portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) test., Results: The cumulative incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy was higher in patients with IL-6 levels above the median of 9 pg/mL than in patients with IL-6 levels at or below the median (35.6% vs 1.9%, P < .001). After adjustment for covert hepatic encephalopathy, history of overt hepatic encephalopathy, C-reactive protein (CRP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), IL-6 levels above the median remained independently associated with the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy. The predictive performance of IL-6 regarding the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy during the next 180 days (AUROC, 0.931) was numerically higher than that of MELD (AUROC, 0.841) or CRP (AUROC, 0.835). In patients without prior overt hepatic encephalopathy, the predictive performance of IL-6 (AUROC, 0.966) was even significantly higher than that of MELD (AUROC 0.843) or CRP (AUROC 0.850). The ideal cut-off for IL-6 in this setting was 23.5 pg/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.3% and 89.5% respectively., Conclusion: IL-6 serum levels are closely linked to the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) under current management options remains uncertain., Aim: To examine whether, depending on the initial presentation, non-erosive (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) without Barrett's oesophagus will progress to more severe disease under current routine care following the resolution of the initial condition., Methods: Patients with the primary symptom of heartburn were included at baseline, and stratified into non-erosive (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD), LA grades A-D (Los Angeles classification). After a 2- to 8-week course with esomeprazole therapy to achieve endoscopic healing in ERD and symptom relief in NERD, patients were treated routinely at the discretion of their physician. We report oesophagitis status and the presence of endoscopic and confirmed Barrett's oesophagus after 5 years., Results: A total of 6215 patients were enrolled in the study of whom 2721 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Progression, regression and stability of GERD severity were followed from baseline to 5 years. Only a few patients with NERD and mild/moderate ERD progressed to severe forms of ERD and even Barrett's oesophagus. Most patients remained stable or showed improvement in their oesophagitis; 5.9% of the NERD patients, 12.1% of LA grade A/B patients and 19.7% of LA grade C/D patients in whom no Barrett's oesophagus was recorded at baseline progressed to endoscopic or confirmed Barrett's oesophagus at 5 years., Conclusion: Most GERD patients remain stable or improve over a 5-year observation period under current routine clinical care., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Generic omeprazole has been approved in many countries for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. However, clinical studies comparing generic to original proton pump inhibitors are limited., Aims: To compare the effect of generic omeprazole 20 mg/day with esomeprazole 20 mg/day on intragastric acidity and to investigate the influence of the CYP2C19 metabolizer status., Methods: In this randomised, single-blinded, two-way crossover study, 24 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects, received generic omeprazole (Omep; Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany) 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for five consecutive days. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was recorded on day 5 of each treatment. CYP2C19 status was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism., Results: Over all, there were no statistically significant differences between generic omeprazole and esomeprazole with respect to median intragastric pH (3.5 and 3.9, P = 0.07), the total hours with intragastric pH >4 (10.4 and 11.3, P = 0.29), and during upright (9.6 and 9.1, P = 0.77) or supine (2.2 and 2.2, P = 0.94) position. However, in CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers, esomeprazole was superior to omeprazole, with the percentage of time with intragastric pH >3.0 and pH >3.5 being higher with esomeprazole than with generic omeprazole [Δ = 9% (P = 0.026) and Δ = 8% (P = 0.046), respectively]., Conclusions: Overall, generic omeprazole 20 mg appears to provide a similar intragastric acid control when compared with esomeprazole 20 mg. However, esomeprazole might be advantageous in subjects with a rapid CYP2C19 metabolizer status., (© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Ability to predict freedom from heartburn relapse during maintenance therapy for healed reflux oesophagitis may facilitate optimal treatment choices for individual patients., Aim: To determine factors predicting freedom from heartburn relapse during maintenance proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with healed reflux oesophagitis., Methods: This post-hoc analysis used data from the maintenance phase of the EXPO study (AstraZeneca study code: SH-NEG-0008); 2766 patients with healed reflux oesophagitis and resolved heartburn received once-daily esomeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 20 mg for 6 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with freedom from heartburn relapse., Results: Heartburn relapse rates were lower with esomeprazole than pantoprazole in all subgroups analysed. Esomeprazole treatment was the factor most strongly associated with freedom from heartburn relapse (odds ratio 2.08; P < 0.0001). Other factors significantly associated with freedom from heartburn relapse were Helicobacter pylori infection, greater age, non-obesity, absence of epigastric pain at baseline, pre-treatment nonsevere heartburn and GERD symptom duration < or =5 years., Conclusions: Several factors predict freedom from heartburn relapse during maintenance proton pump inhibitor therapy for healed reflux oesophagitis, the strongest being choice of proton pump inhibitor. These findings outline the importance of optimizing acid control and identifying predictors of relapse for effective long-term symptom management in reflux oesophagitis patients.

Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be associated with laryngo-respiratory symptoms (LRS) such as chronic cough, asthma or laryngeal symptoms., Aim: To analyse the long-term clinical course of LRS in a large population with GERD and LRS., Methods: ProGERD is a prospective multicentre cohort study of 6215 adult out-patients with GERD. At baseline, the prevalence of LRS was assessed. Initial standardized treatment was esomeprazole for up to 8 weeks. After 5 years of follow-up, patients were interviewed for LRS and a multivariate analysis was performed with resolved vs. persistent symptoms for chronic cough, asthma and laryngeal symptoms., Results: In all, 2886 patients (46.4%) were available for analysis at baseline and at 5 years. The prevalence of chronic cough and laryngeal disorders had decreased while the prevalence of asthma had increased. Resolution of LRS was independent of clinical reflux characteristics or PPI medication., Conclusions: In a large population with GERD, only few patients reported persistent LRS over 5 years. Resolution of LRS was independent of the stage of GERD and PPI treatment. Accordingly, data on the direction of causality between GERD and LRS are lacking and the strength of the association between the two must remain controversial.

Background: The ability to predict symptom response to reflux oesophagitis-healing therapy may optimize treatment decisions., Aim: To identify factors associated with heartburn resolution in patients receiving acid-suppressive therapy for reflux oesophagitis., Methods: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial (EXPO; AstraZeneca study code: SH-NEG-0008), patients with endoscopically confirmed reflux oesophagitis and reflux symptoms received once-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy [esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 1562) or pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 1589)] for >or=4 weeks. Factors associated with heartburn resolution after 4 weeks were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis., Results: Esomeprazole therapy, positive Helicobacter pylori status and greater age were associated with an increased likelihood of heartburn resolution [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.31 (1.12, 1.54), 1.44 (1.19, 1.74) and 1.013 (1.007, 1.019) per year, respectively; all P < 0.001]. Men and patients with no acid regurgitation or epigastric pain pre-treatment were also more likely to achieve heartburn resolution (all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The use of esomeprazole rather than pantoprazole increases the probability of achieving resolution of heartburn during reflux oesophagitis-healing therapy. Other factors, including H. pylori status, age, gender and symptom profile may be helpful in determining the likelihood of heartburn resolution in such patients.

Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder associated with substantial reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQL)., Aim: To describe patterns of change in HRQL during 5 years of follow-up in a large population of GERD patients., Methods: In 2000, a total of 6215 GERD patients were enrolled in the Progression of GERD (ProGERD) study. During follow-up, patients received any medication considered necessary. HRQL was assessed yearly with the Short-Form 36 and the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaires. Associations between patient characteristics and changes in HRQL were analysed using multiple logistic regression models., Results: After 5 years, data on HRQL were available for 4597 (74%) patients. Both generic and disease-specific HRQL improved after baseline and remained well above baseline levels in the following years. A clinically relevant decrease in QOLRAD scores was reported by 3-5% of patients. According to our multivariate analysis, a decrease in HRQL was associated with a higher reflux symptom load and the presence of night-time heartburn., Conclusions: Only a small minority of the ProGERD population reported a clinically relevant decrease in HRQL, which was associated most strongly with nocturnal heartburn.

Background: Gastrin and pepsinogens reflect the functional state of the gastric mucosa., Aim: To evaluate whether serum gastrin and pepsinogens correlate with the different grades of severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD)., Methods: In all, 388 patients with heartburn not taking any form of acid suppressive therapy were matched-controlled for age and gender and sub-classified into four groups: group 1 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD); group 2, erosive reflux disease (ERD) Los Angeles (LA) A and B, group 3, ERD LA C and D; group 4 Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Fasting serum was analysed for gastrin 17, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II und Helicobacter pylori using specific EIA tests (GastroPanel; Biohit, Plc)., Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance., Results: There was a significant difference among the four groups with respect for pepsinogen I, but not for pepsinogen II, the pepsinogen I pepsinogen II ratio, H. pylori serology and gastrin levels. Pepsinogen I was the lowest in NERD and the highest in BO (median 91.6, mean +/- standard deviation 106.2 +/- 51.6 vs. median 114.7, mean +/- standard deviation 130.4 +/- 70.6; P = 0.046). Pepsinogen I levels were higher in H. pylori positive subjects. After adjusting for H. pylori status, the differences in pepsinogen I across patient groups were no longer statistically significant (P = 0.298)., Conclusions: Serum gastrin and pepsinogen I and II do not correlate with the different grades of severity of GERD. The non-invasive GastroPanel is not useful for the differentiation of the various forms of GERD.

Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition frequently requiring long-term pharmacological treatment., Aim: To describe the long-term pattern of GERD medication use in GERD patients receiving routine care., Methods: Patients were recruited as part of the ongoing ProGERD study, a 10-year-cohort study including 6215 patients at baseline. GERD medication and symptoms were assessed with patient questionnaires. During follow-up, medical treatment was prescribed by participating primary care physicians. Associations between patient characteristics and medication were analysed by logistic regression., Results: The percentage of patients who reported using any GERD medication remained constant from year 1 to year 4 (74%, 74%, 73% and 71%). Of patients who reported using GERD medication, the majority were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (79%, 84%, 85%, and 87%). Continuous PPI intake was the predominant prescription pattern (53%, 49%, 56% and 56%), followed by on-demand treatment (26%, 35%, 29% and 29%). Continuous PPI intake was strongly associated with the presence of erosive GERD., Conclusion: Three-quarters of the GERD population in our study reported long-term treatment with a PPI. Continuous PPI intake was the predominant treatment pattern, and the proportion of patients taking a PPI on a continuous basis remained constant over time.

Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and frequently chronic condition that causes considerable costs., Aim: To estimate the economic burden caused by patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease, and Barrett's oesophagus., Methods: The Progression of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease study includes a total of 6,215 patients. At baseline, patients were categorized as non-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease, or Barrett's oesophagus according to endoscopic findings alone or as confirmed by histology. Direct and indirect disease-related costs were calculated based on 5,273 patients with complete information in the second year of the study., Results: A total of 73% of the Progression of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease patients had taken GERD medication, 61% had visited a doctor, and 2% had been hospitalized because of GERD during the previous 12 months. Of all employed persons, 6% reported days off work because of GERD. This health resource utilization caused direct costs of 342+/-864 (mean+/-s.d.) and indirect costs of 40+/-473 per patient and year. Total costs for patients with Barrett's oesophagus or erosive reflux disease were higher than those for patients with non-erosive reflux disease., Conclusion: Patients with GERD frequently need long-term medication and doctor care. The disorder is associated with a considerable health economic burden to society.

Background: Proton pump inhibitor therapy has been reported to reduce proliferative changes of the oesophagus significantly in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD)., Aim: To assess the histological effects of esomeprazole treatment on the oesophagus., Methods: Data were derived from a subgroup of patients participating in the proGERD study, who had either erosive reflux disease (n = 720) or non-erosive reflux disease (n = 35) and who had biopsy data from two sites [(i) 2 cm above the z-line and (ii) at the z-line], obtained at baseline and following treatment with esomeprazole. Proliferative changes of the squamous epithelium were assessed histologically by measuring thickness of the basal cell layer and elongation of the papillae as a percentage of the whole epithelial thickness., Results: In erosive reflux disease patients, the thickness of the basal cell layer and length of the papillae pretreatment were associated with the severity of oesophagitis (P < 0.05), at both biopsy sites. After esomeprazole treatment, baseline thickness and length of papillae were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) at both biopsy sites in non-erosive reflux disease and erosive reflux disease patients (particularly those with Los Angeles grades C and D)., Conclusion: This demonstrates a strong correlation between severity of GERD and histological parameters. Esomeprazole therapy resulted in clear reversal of proliferative changes observed prior to treatment in the squamous epithelium at both biopsy locations.

Background: Although the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are common in the general adult population, the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is still largely unknown. Lifestyle factors such as diet, body mass index, and smoking have been frequently suggested as possible risk factors., Aim: In the present study, we investigated the relationship between various lifestyle factors and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms., Methods: A total of 7124 subjects were interviewed as part of the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey, a representative sample of the general adult population. We examined a variety of possible risk factors, including age, gender, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, sports and different foods. To investigate the association between lifestyle and symptoms, we used a multiple logistic regression model, including various gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patient characteristics., Results: We found an association among those with reflux symptoms who were overweight and obese (odds ratio: 1.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.2; odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.2-3.2), respectively. Further risk factors included smoking and the frequent consumption of spirits, sweets, or white bread. Physical activity and the consumption of fruits seemed to have some protective effect., Conclusions: Lifestyle factors -- in particular overweight, obesity and smoking -- were associated with increased reflux symptoms.

Background: Following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis, most patients require maintenance therapy to prevent relapse., Aim: To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission rates over 6 months' maintenance therapy with esomeprazole or pantoprazole (both 20 mg once daily) in patients with healed erosive oesophagitis., Methods: Patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis at baseline were randomized to receive esomeprazole 40 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for up to 8 weeks. Patients with healed erosive oesophagitis and free of moderate/severe heartburn and acid regurgitation at 4 weeks or, if necessary, 8 weeks entered the 6-month maintenance therapy phase of the study., Results: A total of 2766 patients (63% men; mean age 50 years) received esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 1377) or pantoprazole 20 mg (n = 1389) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. Following 6 months of treatment, the proportion of patients in endoscopic and symptomatic remission was significantly greater for those receiving esomeprazole 20 mg (87.0%) than pantoprazole 20 mg (74.9%, log-rank test P < 0.0001). Esomeprazole 20 mg produced a higher proportion of patients free of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and fewer discontinuations because of symptoms than pantoprazole 20 mg (92.2% vs. 88.5%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Esomeprazole 20 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis and relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

Background: Patients with severe or complicated reflux disease may require higher than standard doses of a proton pump inhibitor for sufficient acid suppression., Aim: To test the hypothesis that esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily is superior to pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily in lowering intragastric acidity., Methods: In a randomized, single-blinded, two-way crossover study, healthy subjects received esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily orally for five consecutive days. Continuous ambulatory 24-h intragastric pH was recorded on day 5 of each treatment., Results: Thirty subjects were analysed. Esomeprazole provided significantly higher intragastric pH-values over the 24-h period [median intragastric pH 6.4 for esomeprazole and 5.1 for pantoprazole (P < 0.00005)]. Intragastric pH > 4 was maintained for 21.1 h with esomeprazole and 16.8 h with pantoprazole (P < 0.0001). An intragastric pH > 4 for more than 16 h was achieved in 96.7 and 56.7% of subjects, respectively (P = 0.0002). During night-time the proportion of time with intragastric pH > 4 was 85.4% with esomeprazole and 63.6% with pantoprazole (P = 0.0001). Nocturnal acid break through occurred less frequently on esomeprazole., Conclusions: Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provides better and more consistent intragastric acid control than pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of the 8-week therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg for healing erosive oesophagitis (EE) as part of a management study., Methods: Patients had a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms (> or =6 months) and had suffered heartburn on at least 4 of the 7 days preceding enrollment. Endoscopies were performed to grade EE severity using the Los Angeles (LA) classification system at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks (if unhealed at 4 weeks). Heartburn severity was recorded by patients on diary cards. The primary end point was healing of EE by week 8 of treatment., Results: Of 3170 patients randomized, the intent-to-treat population consisted of 3151 patients (63% male, mean age: 50.6 years, 27% Helicobacter pylori-positive). Esomeprazole 40 mg healed a significantly greater proportion of EE patients than pantoprazole 40 mg at both 4 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 81%, pantoprazole 75%, P < 0.001) and 8 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 96%, pantoprazole 92%, P < 0.001). The median time to reach sustained heartburn resolution was 6 days in patients receiving esomeprazole and 8 days with pantoprazole (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Esomeprazole 40 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg for healing EE and providing resolution of associated heartburn.

Aims: To determine the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the quality of life, to assess changes in the quality of life during treatment with esomeprazole and to define factors that can predict these changes., Methods: Patients with GERD (n=6215) were included in a prospective cohort study (ProGERD). All patients underwent endoscopy and received esomeprazole. At baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment, symptoms and quality of life were assessed. Factors that influenced changes in the quality of life were determined by multiple regression analyses., Results: At baseline, the quality of life in GERD patients was lower than that in the general population, and was similar to that in patients after acute coronary events. No differences in symptoms or quality of life were observed between the subgroups of patients with non-erosive GERD, erosive GERD and Barrett's oesophagus. After treatment with esomeprazole, the symptoms and quality of life were improved in all subscales within 2 weeks (P<0.001). The mean score of the disease-specific quality of life instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Patients) increased from 4.6 to 6.2 points, representing a highly relevant clinical improvement. The generic quality of life (SF-36) reached levels similar to those in the general population, but, again, no difference was found between the three different subgroups of GERD patients. The main factors associated with an improvement in the quality of life after treatment were symptom relief, severe erosive reflux disease, absence of extra-oesophageal disorders, avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake and positive Helicobacter pylori status., Conclusions: GERD causes a significant impairment in the quality of life that can be attenuated or normalized within a time period as short as 2 weeks by treatment with esomeprazole. These findings were similar across the whole GERD patient spectrum.

Background and Aims: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be associated with a variety of extra-oesophageal disorders (EED) such as chronic cough, asthma, laryngeal disorder or chest pain. The aim of the study was to estimate and compare the prevalence of EED in a population with symptomatic GERD presenting as either erosive reflux disease (ERD) or non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)., Methods: Baseline data were collected from a prospective, multicentre, open cohort study (ProGERD) in which patients will be followed for 5 years after initial treatment with esomeprazole. Within the framework of this trial, all patients underwent gastroscopy and filled out a questionnaire designed to assess EED. The influence of potential prognostic factors on the prevalence of EED was analysed by multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) analysis., Results: 6215 patients (3303 male, 2912 female; mean age 54 years) presenting with heartburn were included. EED was detected in 32.8% of all patients. The proportion was significantly higher (P = 0.0002) in ERD patients (34.9%) than in NERD patients (30.5%). As judged from the multivariate analysis, female gender, age, oesophagitis of LA grade C/D, duration of GERD disease greater than 1 years and smoking were significantly associated with EED. ERD patients with oesophagitis of LA grade A or B did not have a significantly higher risk of EED than patients with NERD., Conclusions: Patients with GERD have a high probability of experiencing EED, which may be associated with a number of prognostic factors such as duration and severity of GERD. Extra-oesophageal disorders are slightly, but statistically, more prevalent in ERD than in NERD patients.

Background: Pantoprazole is claimed to have a lower potential for drug interaction than other proton pump inhibitors., Aim: To estimate the frequency of adverse events and drug interactions reported to the Food and Drug Administration in patients receiving omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole., Methods: The study involved a search of the Food and Drug Administration's database for adverse events and drug interactions with omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole as primary or secondary suspect drug. An estimate of the amount of drug dispensed during the adverse event collection period (from US drug launch) was obtained from the International Medical Statistics health database., Results: Of the suspected drug interactions recorded, vitamin K antagonist interactions, although rare, were the most common. The frequency of vitamin K antagonist interactions was 0.09 per million packages for omeprazole and 0.11 per million packages for lansoprazole and pantoprazole. Interactions with benzodiazepines or phenytoin were even rarer, being reported in less than 10 patients on each proton pump inhibitor., Conclusion: The frequency of reported drug interactions was low for omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole and vitamin K antagonist interactions were by far the most common. These potentially important drug interactions, although rare, were no less frequent on pantoprazole than on omeprazole or lansoprazole, suggesting a class effect.

Background: The optimal second-line treatment after failed Helicobacter pylori therapy has not been established., Aims: To ascertain whether quadruple therapy or triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is the superior re-treatment after triple therapy containing a macrolide and a nitroimidazole, and to determine the impact of microbial in vitro resistance., Methods: Patients after failed triple therapy were randomly allocated to one of two 1-week second-line treatments: omeprazole, 40 mg, clarithromycin, 500 mg, and amoxicillin, 1 g, all b.d.; or omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., bismuth subsalicylate, 600 mg q.d.s., metronidazole, 400 mg t.d.s., and tetracycline, 500 mg q.d.s. Post-therapeutic Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after treatment., Results: The study was terminated after including 84 patients. H. pylori cure rates differed significantly: omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin: intention-to-treat, 43%; per protocol, 50%; omeprazole-bismuth subsalicylate-metronidazole-tetracycline: intention-to-treat, 68%; per protocol, 69%. The frequencies of resistance after first-line therapy were: metronidazole, 90%; clarithromycin, 71%; both combined, 68%. For clarithromycin resistance, H. pylori cure with omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin was 30% vs. 83% for clarithromycin susceptibility., Conclusions: Omeprazole-bismuth subsalicylate-metron- idazole-tetracycline was superior to omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin, but both therapies yielded unsatisfactory results. The high rate of post-therapeutic dual resistance has a negative impact on omepraz- ole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin, and probably also on omeprazole-bismuth subsalicylate-metronidazole-tetracycline, and limits the choice for second-line treatment.

Background: Esomeprazole is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an optical isomer for the treatment of acid-related diseases., Methods: Four hundred and forty eight duodenal ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, confirmed by 13C-urea breath test (UBT), and no current ulcer, were randomised to double-blind treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily (b.d.) (n=224) or omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (n=224), in combination with amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). A negative UBT at both 4 and 8 weeks after completing therapy indicated successful H. pylori eradication., Results: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis comprised 400 patients (EAC, n=204; OAC, n=196) and per protocol (PP) analysis 377 patients (EAC, n=192; OAC, n=185). Eradication rates (95% confidence intervals) for ITT and PP populations were: EAC, 90% (85-94%) and 91% (86-94%); OAC, 88% (82-92%) and 91% (86-95%). Between-group differences in eradication rates were not statistically significant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with an adverse event profile and frequency typical of proton pump inhibitor plus antibiotic combination therapy., Conclusions: Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 1 week is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer disease, offers comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapy, and is well tolerated.

Background: Several studies have shown that dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxycillin may cure Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the optimum dose of omeprazole has still to be established., Methods: An international, randomized, double-blind multicentre trial was conducted in patients with duodenal ulcers to compare the H. pylori cure rates obtained by dual therapy consisting of either omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 750 mg b.d. or omeprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 750 mg b.d. for 2 weeks. Dual therapy was followed by omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 2 weeks. Before entering the trial and 4 weeks after cessation of treatment H. pylori infection was assessed by histology and a 13C-urea breath test., Results: 381 patients were randomized into the study, of whom 345 were evaluable for the all-patients-treated analysis of efficacy and 378 were valid for the evaluation of safety. Histology results showed that H. pylori infection was cured in 64 out 174 patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin and in 102 out of 171 patients treated with omeprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin (37% vs. 60%; P < 0.001). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, with adverse events reported by 29 (15.2%) and 35 patients (18.7%), respectively., Conclusions: This study has shown that dual therapy with amoxycillin 750 mg b.d. and omeprazole 40 mg b.d. is superior to dual therapy with amoxycillin and omeprazole 20 mg b.d. in patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers. Thus, a true dose-response relationship exists between omeprazole and treatment success. However, a combination of omeprazole with two of amoxycillin, clarithromycin and nitroimidazole is a preferable alternative for routine clinical use.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that 1-week low-dose triple therapy for H. pylori is sufficient for relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers., Methods: Fifty-nine out-patients with duodenal ulcers and positive rapid urease test participated in this randomized, double-blind, two-centre study. All patients were treated for 1 week with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. In a double-blind fashion, patients were then randomly treated for another 3 weeks with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or an identical-looking placebo. Patients were investigated endoscopically before treatment for H. pylori, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. H. pylori infection was assessed by a 13C-urea breath test at the time of enrollment and 4 weeks after cessation of any study medication., Results: Fifty-two patients were included in the 'all patients treated' analysis of efficacy. The overall H. pylori cure rate was 96% (95% CI = 87-100%), with no difference between the treatment groups. After 2 weeks duodenal ulcer healing was confirmed in 91% (95% CI = 80-100%) of patients treated with omeprazole and in 76% (95% CI = 60-91%) in the placebo group (P = 0.14). After 4 weeks all ulcers had healed. Relief from dyspeptic symptoms and adverse events (13.8 and 16.7%) did not differ between the treatment groups., Conclusions: One-week low-dose triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is a highly effective and well-tolerated approach to the cure of H. pylori infection in patients with a duodenal ulcer. Our data suggest that continuation of antisecretory drug therapy beyond anti-H. pylori therapy is actually excessive regarding relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers.

Background: Previous studies have shown that one-week triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin may cure Helicobacter pylori infection in the vast majority of patients. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that a triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin cures the infection in > or = 80% of duodenal ulcer patients infected with H. pylori., Methods: In an open two-centre study, 60 duodenal ulcer patients were treated with pantoprazole 40 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 1 week. During the second week patients received pantoprazole 40 mg once in the morning. We assessed H. pylori infection before treatment and 4 weeks after cessation of the study medication by a rapid urease test, histology after Warthin-Starry stain and a 13C-urea breath test., Results: Sixty patients (42 males, mean age 47.4 years) entered the trial. All patients were infected with H. pylori. One patient was withdrawn from the study because of allergy to penicillin and six patients were protocol violators. H. pylori infection was cured in 47 out of 53 patients who completed the trial according to the protocol (89%; 95% CI: 80-97%) and in 49 of 60 patients included in the trial (82%; 95% CI: 72-92%). Four weeks after the last administration of study drugs, 55 out of 60 ulcers had healed (92%). Twenty-nine patients reported 51 adverse events that were mostly mild to moderate., Conclusions: One-week triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin is a simple and effective approach to the cure of H. pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer. In those patients who took the drugs as prescribed the H. pylori cure rate was 89%, with the lower 95% confidence limit being 80%.

Aim: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 1-week triple therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori., Methods: In two consecutive series, 120 patients with proven H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia were treated with either omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OAC; n = 60) or with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. over 1 week (OAM; n = 60). H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test, culture and histology before and 4 weeks after cessation of the eradication therapy., Results: H. pylori eradication succeeded in 53 out of 60 patients by omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (OAC) (88%; 95% CI 77-95%) and in 47 out of 60 patients by omeprazole-amoxycillin-metronidazole (OAM) (78%; 95% CI 66-88%) (P = 0.22). Nine patients of each group available for follow-up reported adverse events (15.0 and 15.5%, respectively) without necessity of discontinuation of the study medications. Serious adverse events were not observed., Conclusions: Simple and convenient 1-week triple therapies consisting of omeprazole, amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole are sufficiently effective in eradicating H. pylori infection.

Methods: Fifty patients with relapsing or complicated Helicobacter pylori positive duodenal (n = 41) or gastric ulcer disease (n = 9) and failure of a combined treatment with omeprazole plus amoxycillin to eradicate H. pylori infection were re-treated with either oral triple therapy (bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole, tetracycline) plus ranitidine [group I: n = 22] or high-dose omeprazole (40 mg b.d. to t.d.s.) plus amoxycillin (1 g t.d.s.) [group II: n = 28]., Results: Patients of group I and II had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. The overall proportion of eradication of H. pylori infection was 81.8% in group I and 78.6% in group II (P = N.S.) as judged from negative bacterial findings by means of an urease test, specific culture and histology after modified Giemsa stain. Ulcer healing was observed in all patients after a maximum duration of 10 weeks. Ten patients on triple therapy and only one patient on omeprazole plus amoxycillin (45.5% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.001) complained of side effects without necessity of discontinuation of the study medication in either group. Twenty patients (group I: n = 10; group II: n = 10) with relapsing duodenal ulcer disease and successful cure were prospectively followed for one year without any evidence of ulcer relapse or H. pylori re-infection., Conclusion: Oral triple therapy plus ranitidine or high-dose omeprazole plus amoxycillin remain highly effective in eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease and treatment failure of omeprazole/amoxycillin, but the omeprazole enhanced antibiotic monotherapy seems to be superior with regard to side effects. Thus, high-dose omeprazole/amoxycillin is recommended as the treatment of first choice in these selected patients. Triple therapy should be reserved for patients intolerant of amoxycillin.