Search

Background: Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) is the foundation of treatment for the majority of patients with primary immunodeficiency. Clinical history and laboratory evaluation define the patients for whom IGRT is necessary and appropriate. During the 70 years since the first patient was treated, new products have led to the development of several modes of administration that facilitate the individualization of treatment that enables the optimization of care. Objective: The objective was to explain the assessment of candidates for IGRT and approaches to reevaluating recipients of IGRT to decide on the need to continue treatment and to review the approaches to optimize IGRT. Methods: The relevant literature was reviewed in the context of the author's experience supervising > 20,000 IGRT treatments over a 40-year period. Results: Providing the most appropriate form of IGRT for individual patients ameliorates disease and lessens the burden of care for patients with primary immunodeficiency. Conclusion: IGRT is safe and effective when used to treat patients with primary immunodeficiency who meet established and appropriate clinical and laboratory criteria.

C1-inhibitor (INH) concentrate, which is recommended as first-line treatment for acute hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in many countries, was recently approved in the United States. We sought to solicit patients' feedback about their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) while being treated with C1-INH concentrate for acute HAE attacks under real-world conditions, as well as the personal impact of the availability of C1-INH on lifestyle and mental health domains. Subjects enrolled in an open-label study of C1-INH at 20 U/kg for acute HAE attacks were invited to participate in a prospectively designed survey to solicit "real-time" patient responses that were collected via an interactive voice response service or online with a personal computer. Eighteen subjects submitted 60 quarterly HRQoL and treatment impact survey responses over 29 months. Seventeen of 18 patients responding reported mean short form 12 HRQoL scores that were within a normal range. More than one-half indicated that C1-INH availability made them feel somewhat or much better, and >80% reported having a better outlook on the future and feeling more secure about the danger of life-threatening attacks. These data confirm a high level of HRQoL and a positive impact in lifestyle and emotional domains among patients who were treated for acute attacks of HAE with C1-INH concentrate.

Placebo-controlled studies established the efficacy of replacement therapy with C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate for treating single acute hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, but only limited data from prospective studies are available on repeated treatment of successive HAE attacks. This study evaluates the association between repeated treatments with 20 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate (Berinert; CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) for HAE attacks at any body location and treatment response. In a post hoc analysis of an open-label extension study (International Multicenter Prospective Angioedema C1-INH Trial [I.M.P.A.C.T.2]), the association between repeated treatment with C1-INH and times to onset of symptom relief and complete resolution of HAE symptoms was assessed in patients who were treated for at least 15 attacks by linear regression on the ordinal attack number. Eighteen patients received C1-INH concentrate for at least 15 HAE attacks over a mean duration of 34 months. Demographic and baseline characteristics of these patients were similar to those of all patients in the study. The distribution of body locations and the intensity of HAE attacks were similar for each of the first 15 attacks and subsequent attacks. The extent of previous use of C1-INH concentrate had no effect on the time to onset of symptom relief, the time to complete resolution of HAE symptoms, or the time between attacks treated with C1-INH concentrate; the median of individual linear regression coefficients was not statistically significantly different from 0. Treatment with 20 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate provided consistent treatment response in patients treated for multiple successive HAE attacks at any body location. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00292981).

Time to onset of symptom relief in hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a common primary end point in clinical studies but it has never been validated by correlation with the course of HAE symptoms. This study was designed as a retrospective validation of the primary end point for a placebo-controlled phase II/III study in patients with HAE. Ninety-eight abdominal attacks were treated with 10 or 20 U/kg of a highly purified C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate or placebo. The primary end point was the time to onset of symptom relief, as determined by the patients. Patients assessed the intensity of the symptoms of pain, nausea, vomiting, cramps, and diarrhea over time. By Spearman rank correlation, the primary end point was compared with the time to first reduction of (1) any symptom intensity, (2) the sum of symptom intensity scores, and (3) the intensity of the last symptom present at baseline. The C1-INH, 20 U/kg, and placebo groups were compared by one-sided two-sample Wilcoxon tests. The time to first reduction in intensity of the last symptom present at baseline had the highest correlation with the primary end point (r = 0.77). The time to onset of symptom relief and the time to the first reduction in intensity of the last symptom were significantly shorter for the C1-INH, 20 U/kg, group compared with placebo (p = 0.009 and p = 0.0036, respectively). The association with the intensity of single symptoms confirmed that the time to onset of symptom relief is an appropriate end point for assessing the efficacy of C1-INH therapy.

Currently available metered dose inhalers (MDIs) do not track the remaining number of doses, indicating the need for a device that accurately monitors medication use. In an open-label study at 37 outpatient centers, patients > or =4 years old with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring short-acting 32-agonists received two actuations of albuterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) [Ventolin HFA: GlaxoSmithKline], 90 microg twice daily, via a novel MDI with an integrated dose counter until all 200 actuations were completed. Concordance between counter readings, diary card-recorded actuations, and canister weights were measured in patients who completed > or =90% of the labeled actuations (n = 224). Adverse events and patient satisfaction were assessed in the intent-to-treat population (n = 268). In 43,865 recorded actuations, 333 counter versus diary discrepancies occurred (discrepancy rate of 0.76%), and 88% of discrepancies were by one to two actuations. Forty-seven percent of patients had no discrepancies. Incidence of the device firing without changes in counter readings was very low (0.09%). Mean expected actuations based on canister weights (184) were slightly lower than mean counter and diary-reported actuations (200 each). At baseline, 62% of patients reported anxiety about not knowing the quantity of medication remaining in their inhaler. On study completion, 92% expressed satisfaction with the dose counter and 92% agreed it would help prevent them from running out of medication. The adverse event profile showed that albuterol HFA was well tolerated. Integrated MDI counters are a useful and reliable tool for tracking a patient's medication supply.