Ouellette, Andrew R, Herskowitz, Jeremy H, Greathouse, Kelsey M, Weber, Audrey J, Hadad, Niran, and Kaczorowski, Catherine C.
Background: The intersection of genetic diversity, memory, and synaptic function is a critical component in better understanding age‐related cognitive decline. Diversity Outbred mice offer the opportunity to investigate cognitive aging across a genetically diverse population in a controlled lab environment. DO mice exhibit an appreciable amount of variance in Contextual Fear Memory and Acquisition (CFM, CFA), which can be linked to individual differences in genetic background (Ouellette A. et al, 2022, Cell Reports). Here, we investigate the role of dendritic spines as a mediator of individual age‐related changes in memory. Methods: 524 DO mice (289 female, 235 male) were aged to either 8 or 18‐months. All mice received contextual fear conditioning (CFC) at 8mo, while another suet received an additional recall test at 17mo and renewal at 18mo. After CFC a subset of brains from each cohort were collected for spine morphology analyses (females, n = 42). One CA1 pyramidal neuron from each brain was imaged and quantified for the density of thin, stubby, mushroom and/or filipodia classified spines in addition to spine volume. Results: While was not a decline in CFM or CFA between 8 and 18mo, we observed expectedly wide range in individual memory outcomes. Thin spine density significantly decreased between 8mo and 18mo, and stubby spine density increased. Spine volume across all spine types increased with age. Apical thin spine density explained 61% of the variance in CFM outcomes, while thin spine volume explained 79% and 43% of variance CFA in apical and basal dendrites respectively. Thin spine density, however, did not associate with CFA outcomes. Conclusions: We have linked dendritic spine density and morphology as a potential mediator of individual outcomes across a genetically diverse population. Our results suggest that there may be an age‐related conversion of thin to stubby spine types, and that mice with fewer thin spines are more likely to have better CFM outcomes, coinciding with reports of thin spines as dynamic "learning spines" rather than "memory storage" spines (Hayashi, Y. 2005, Neuron). We also show that the size of these "learning" thin spines may be more important memory acquisition than their total density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]