1. Modeling defibrillation benefit for survival among cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator recipients
- Author
-
Christopher M. O'Connor, Jeptha P. Curtis, Kenneth C. Bilchick, Yongfei Wang, Alan Cheng, Ramin Shadman, Kumar Dharmarajan, Wayne C. Levy, Lars Lund, Inder S. Anand, Ulrik Sartipy, Ulf Dahlström, Aldo P. Maggioni, and Todd F. Dardas
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,genetic structures ,Defibrillation ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cardiac resynchronization therapy ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Risk Assessment ,Article ,Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Risk model ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Primary prevention ,Internal medicine ,Cox proportional hazards regression ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Registries ,Aged ,Heart Failure ,Sweden ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Incidence ,Absolute risk reduction ,medicine.disease ,Defibrillators, Implantable ,Primary Prevention ,Survival Rate ,Death, Sudden, Cardiac ,Treatment Outcome ,Heart failure ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure having a low expected probability of arrhythmic death may not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to validate models to identify cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates who may not require CRT devices with ICD functionality. METHODS: Heart failure (HF) patients with CRT-Ds and non-CRT ICDs from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and others with no device from 3 separate registries and 3 heart failure trials were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for survival with the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM; estimates overall mortality) and the Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM; estimates proportional risk of arrhythmic death). RESULTS: Among 60,185 patients (age 68.6±11.3 years, 31.9% female) meeting CRT-D criteria, 38,348 had CRT-Ds, 11,389 had non-CRT ICDs, and 10,448 had no device. CRT-D patients had a prominent adjusted survival benefit (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.50–0.55, pmedian had substantially more ICD-attributable benefit (absolute risk reduction of 2.6%/year combined; p
- Published
- 2019