Search

Presents several research papers on agricultural economics in the United States.

Presents abstracts of several research papers published in the December 1976 issue of the 'American Journal of Agricultural Economics.' 'New Equity: A Look at Texas Agricultural Limited Partnerships and the Investors Who Fund Them'; 'Correspondent Banking in Agricultural Finance: An Analysis of Profit Requirements and Pricing Procedures'; 'Energy Scarcity and Nonpoint Source Pollution in Midwestern Agriculture.'

Describes the transformation of agrifood systems in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Context of traditional retail and wholesale system; Determinants of and patterns in the diffusion of supermarkets in the regions; Consequences of the evolution of procurement systems for agrifood business.

Introduces the discussion papers about agricultural structural adjustments to United States policies published as of December 2005.

Economic sanctions are more popular than ever. But do they affect agricultural trade? Combining two new datasets and capitalizing on the latest developments in the empirical structural gravity literature, we investigate the effects of sanctions on international trade of agricultural products. We find that trade sanctions impede agricultural trade, whereas other sanctions do not show any significant impact. Complete trade sanctions have led to about a 67% decrease in the agricultural trade between the sanctioned and sanctioning countries, or a corresponding tariff equivalent of 25%, and we also obtain significant estimates for partial sanctions. At the industry level, we find substantial heterogeneity depending on the sanctioning and sanctioned countries, the type of sanctions used, and the direction of trade flows. The 2014 sanctions on Russia substantially decreased Russia's agricultural trade, mainly due to reduced trade with the EU but also due to reduced trade with other countries. Although no definitive evidence exists that sanctions alter the actions of governments of receiving countries, this paper provides broad evidence that sanctions hamper agrifood trade and hurt producers, consumers, and real output. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents abstracts of several articles on agriculture. 'Six Alternative Methods for Linking Normative and Positive National Agricultural Models,' by Wen-Yuan Huang, Reuben N. Weisz, Kenneth H. Baum, et al; 'The Preference of Purchases Data Over Sales Data in Primary Data Input-Output Models,' by Edward E. Ives; 'Policy, Concepts and Conflicts,' by Frederick L. Leistritz.

Presents summaries of studies on agricultural policy. 'Optimal Control Techniques for Agricultural Policy Analysis: An Application,' by James W. Richardson and Daryll E. Ray; 'Impacts of Price Stabilization and Income Policy,' by William Lin and Ann Ingerson; 'Measurement of Economic Benefits for Potential Public Goods,' by Ian Hardie and Ivar Straud.

Presents abstracts of several articles about agriculture. Components of agricultural productivity; Productive and export capacity in world agriculture; Analysis of supply and demand estimates of the United States farm products.

Presents the abstracts of several studies on agriculture. 'Multiple Output Production Decisions within Canadian Prairie Agriculture' by Brian W. Gould; 'Aggregate Milk Supply Response and Investment Behavior of U.S. Dairy Farms' by Richard M. Klemme and Jean-Paul Chavas; 'The Use of Expectations In Agricultural Supply Response' by Suzanne Hazard and J. Scott Shonkwiler.

This paper examines the agricultural supply relocation of products under geographical indication (GI) labels as an option to adapt to climate change. I develop a stylized framework that endogenously relates the delineation of the production area of the GI product to the distribution of specific geographical characteristics and their influence on the quality of the product and the corresponding comparative advantages. The model can then study how the GI production area responds to climate‐related changes in the production conditions. The model shows that the GI production area can marginally expand as climate change worsens the production conditions, but it may disappear under more severe degradations. This opportunity to relocate current GIs hinges on striking a careful balance between mitigating climate‐induced yield losses and altering quality, but it is also threatened by political economy barriers that govern the redistribution of GI rents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research quality is an increasingly important metric for determining funding allocations, promotion and tenure, and professional prestige. A key metric often used as a proxy for research quality is the ranking of the journal in which a manuscript appears. While citation-based measures of journal quality are commonly used, less is known about other dimensions of journal quality and prestige. We report results from an international study using Best-Worst Scaling to investigate researchers' journal preferences. Respondents used two criteria to assess journals: the impact a paper in the journal would have on career progression, and the impact beyond academia of papers in the journal. Among the sample of journals studied, the American Journal of Agricultural Economics is ranked at the top for career progression for the aggregate sample, while Science was rated at the top for broader impact. We find no significant correlation between the journal scores based on the two criteria, nor between them and the journals' impact factors. These results suggest that impact beyond academia is poorly aligned with career incentives and that citation measures reflect poorly, if at all, peers' esteem of journals. Heteroscedastic scale-adjusted latent class models reveal marked heterogeneity in journal preferences related to researchers' institutional affiliation and geographic region. We find significant differences in error variance over people and choices: people were less consistent when choosing their least, as opposed to their most, preferred journal. This finding has broader implications given the burgeoning use of best-worst surveys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the abstract of the research papers "Factors Affecting the Decision to Exit Farming: A Maine Industry Study," by Lisa Bragg, et al and "How Structural Change in the Western Canadian Dairy Processing Industry Can Lead to New Game Theory Amongst Industry Players," by Ryan Furtas, published in the December 1, 2003 issue of "American Journal of Agricultural Economics".

Presents abstracts of undergraduate papers about agriculture. `Georgia Cotton Acreage Response to the Boil Weevil Eradication Program,' by Camille M. Tribble; `The Feasibility of Cranberry Production in Nova Scotia,' by Jonathan W. McClelland.

The emergence of food and agriculture global value chains (GVCs) is challenging the way scholars look at trade data, as well as how policy makers establish their trade policies. The common perception is that Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, unlike most Latin American and Asian countries, are not deeply integrated into global production networks. Consequently, it is believed that the border protection policies of the former may have a limited impact on GVC participation. This paper challenges this conventional knowledge in two ways. First, by decomposing bilateral gross export into its value added components, we show that the sectoral and bilateral SSA participation in GVC for food and agriculture is substantial. Second, we demonstrate that trade policies impact backward and forward value chain linkages. These results call for a refinement of trade policy priorities in SSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the success of efforts to reduce phosphorus (P) pollution from point sources, P from non-point agricultural sources remains a vexing problem with many U.S. water bodies having impairments. Key to solving the P pollution puzzle is to take stock of progress to date, the puzzle pieces available, and the gaps to be filled. In this paper, we synthesize the state of knowledge on P pollution, discuss the state of existing public programs, and review economists' contributions to informing P pollution policies. We review the water quality valuation literature, identifying limitations in the linkages to policy-relevant environmental quality metrics. We examine how and why P is used agriculturally, along with recent advances in market-based policy design and field testing. We survey new knowledge in biology and engineering, including improved understanding of the fate and transport of P. In light of recent learning and persistent knowledge gaps, we recommend directions for economic research to add needed pieces to the puzzle of how to protect our water bodies. Puzzle gaps meriting attention include mechanisms to target public funds more effectively in voluntary abatement programs, policy design for emerging mitigation technologies, new ways to implement performance-based policies, means to leverage social norms and behavioral cues, changes in the "pay-the-polluter" paradigm, and application of state-of-the-art evaluation methods to conservation programs. Beyond the realm of public policy lies that of private supply chains, where establishment of environmental standards holds additional promise. Rich research opportunities exist for economists in tandem with biologists, engineers, and others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using detailed monthly household panel data from rural India, I analyze sectoral wage gaps for men and women. I show that the wage gap across the non‐farm and farm sectors is much higher for women than for men. Relative to men, women also work less time in non‐farm wage employment than in farm wage employment. Taken together, these findings suggest that constraints are preventing women from reallocating their time to more remunerative wage employment opportunities. Women are less likely to work outside of their own village in the non‐farm sector, yet the wage gap is driven by higher caste and married women. These results are consistent with a lack of local non‐farm employment opportunities interacting with barriers to labor mobility for women but not men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses articles written by various authors on agriculture and rural economies in the United States and Canada. Importance of property rights; Details on the cross subsidization of rural people; Criticism of the articles; Impact of rural policies on the environment; Examination of the Canadian constitution.