Search

Focuses on the incidence of coronary artery aneurysm formation after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and elective Palmaz-Scatz stent implantation. Risk factors for aneurysm formation after coronary intervention; Relation of aneurysm formation to restenosis and clinical outcome.

Examines whether the interprocedural interval is predictive of restenosis after the elective stent implantation for recurrent lesions following a coronary angioplasty. Eligibility criteria for myocardial ischemia; Quantitative coronary analysis of cineangiograms; Interprocedural interval for restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

Clopidogrel hypersensitivity affects up to 6% of treated patients, often leading to discontinuation of the drug. Conventional desensitization protocols incorporate a washout period off medication that may be problematic after percutaneous coronary intervention because premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is a major risk factor for stent thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a strategy for treating clopidogrel hypersensitivity without drug interruption using corticosteroids and antihistamines to facilitate development of physiologic tolerance. The study population consisted of 25 consecutive patients who developed clopidogrel hypersensitivity after percutaneous coronary intervention and were managed with suppressive therapy using corticosteroids and antihistamines. Treatment success (resolution of hypersensitivity symptoms without interrupting clopidogrel) was assessed, in addition to duration of clopidogrel therapy and adverse cardiac events during late follow-up (mean 670 ± 630 days). The cohort included 19 men and 6 women with a mean age of 62 ± 9 years. Drug-eluting stents were used in 16 patients (64%). Clopidogrel hypersensitivity occurred 6 ± 2 days after drug initiation. Treatment included corticosteroids (5 patients), antihistamines (5 patients), or corticosteroids and antihistamines (15 patients). Patients treated with corticosteroids received tapering courses for a mean of 10 ± 8 days. Treatment was successful with sustained symptom resolution in 22 of 25 patients (88%). Clopidogrel therapy was continued in successfully desensitized patients for 417 ± 369 days and in patients with drug-eluting stents for 529 ± 376 days. There were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or stent thrombosis during extended follow-up. In conclusion, clopidogrel hypersensitivity can be successfully treated using short-course corticosteroids and antihistamines without interrupting drug therapy. This technique enables long-term continuation of clopidogrel and confers a low risk of adverse cardiac events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have lower functional capacity and worse clinical outcomes than age- and gender-matched patients. Few data exist on the relation of PAD to functional and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to compare patients with HF with and without PAD for baseline functional capacity, response to exercise training, and clinical outcomes. HF-ACTION was a randomized controlled trial comparing usual care to structured exercise training plus usual care in patients with HF and an ejection fraction ≤35% and New York Heart Association class II to IV HF symptoms. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing occurred at enrollment, 3 months, and 1 year. Clinical follow-up occurred up to 4 years. Of the 2,331 HF-ACTION patients, 157 (6.8%) had PAD. At baseline, patients with HF and PAD had a shorter exercise duration (8.0 vs 9.8 minutes, p <0.001), lower peak oxygen consumption (12.5 vs 14.6 ml/kg/min, p <0.001), and shorter 6-minute walking distance (306 vs 371 m, p <0.001) compared to patients with HF without PAD. At 3 months patients with HF and PAD had less improvement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (exercise duration 0.5 vs 1.1 minutes, p = 0.002; mean change in peak oxygen consumption 0.1 vs 0.6 ml/kg/min, p = 0.04) compared to patients with HF without PAD. PAD was an independent predictor of all-cause death or hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.62, p = 0.011). Patients with PAD and HF had deceased baseline exercise capacity and decreased response to exercise training. In conclusion, PAD is an independent predictor of all-cause death or hospitalization in patients with HF. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We present the completed 1-year follow-up results of the original Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS I), in which 407 patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease and new lesions of the native coronary circulation were randomly assigned to treatment with either the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent or conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The present study compares the safety of elective stenting to balloon angioplasty (PTCA) in terms of freedom from clinical events up to 1 year after treatment. Patients were enrolled and treated from January 1991 through February 1993, and follow-up data were collected and verified until July 1995. Ninety-seven percent of all patients had complete follow-up (deceased or alive with known clinical status) beyond 8 months, and 94% beyond 11 months. Anginal status between 9 to 15 months postprocedure was available for 78% of patients. At 1 year, 154 patients (75%) assigned to stent implantation and 141 (70%) to PTCA were free of all clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization procedure), and 162 stent patients (79%) and 149 PTCA patients (74%) were free from death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Symptom-driven target lesion revascularization occurred in 12% of the stent group versus 17% of the PTCA group. None of these differences in clinical events was statistically significant. Only 2 patients in the stent group and 7 in the PTCA group had a first event after 239 days, and freedom from angina at 1 year was reported in equal frequency in both groups (84%). There appear to be no late adverse effects of stent implantation. However, these results are limited by low statistical power, narrow patient selection, and the anticoagulation regimen used in the early experience with this device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva with an intramural course (R-ACAOS-IM) may cause sudden cardiac death in children and adolescents. However, the natural history and management of patients in whom this anomaly is detected later during adulthood remains uncertain. The goals of this study were to assess the impact of an R-ACAOS-IM on the clinical outcomes in an adult population and to determine if adult patients with this anomaly who do not have significant coronary artery disease (CAD) can be managed safely without surgical intervention. A database review identified patients aged >35 years with anomalous coronary arteries diagnosed by cardiac catheterization or coronary computed tomography angiography. The outcomes of patients with R-ACAOS-IM were compared with patients with anomalous left circumflex coronary arteries with retroaortic course (LCx-RA) (an anomaly not associated with ischemic events). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The study population consisted of 185 patients aged 59 ± 12 years. Clinical characteristics were similar in the R-ACAOS-IM (n = 88) and LCx-RA (n = 97) groups. At a follow-up of 6.6 ± 4.5 years, there was no difference in mortality (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.28, p = 0.20) when adjusted for gender, age, and CAD. A subgroup analysis of 88 patients with no obstructive CAD managed nonoperatively found no difference between the LCx and R-ACAOS-IM groups in mortality (hazard ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 13.40, p = 0.30). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the composite outcome of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or survived cardiac arrest. The outcome of adult patients who have anomalous R-ACAOS-IM are similar to patients who have anomalous LCx-RA with a known benign course. In conclusion, these results suggest that most patients who survive this anomaly into adulthood may be managed conservatively without intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

QRS duration (QRSd) is ill-defined and under-researched as a prognosticator in patients with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We analyzed 240,866 adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using data from the United Kingdom Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project. Clinical characteristics and all-cause in-hospital mortality were analyzed according to QRSd, with 38,023 patients presenting with a QRSd >120 ms and 202,842 patients with a QRSd <120 ms. Patients with a QRSd >120 ms were more frequently older (median age of 79 years vs 71 years, p <0.001), and of white ethnicity (93% vs 91%, p <0.001). Patients with a QRSd <120 ms had higher frequency of use of aspirin (97% vs 95%, p <0.001), P2Y12 inhibitor (93% vs 89%, p <0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (82% vs 81%, p <0.001) and β blockers (83% vs 78%, p <0.001). Invasive management strategies were more likely to be used in patients with QRSd <120 ms including invasive coronary angiography (72% vs 54%, p <0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (46% vs 33%, p <0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (8% vs 6%, p <0.001). In a propensity score matching analysis, there were no differences between the 2 groups in the adjusted rates of in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.01) or major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.02) during the index admission. In conclusion, prolonged QRSd >120 ms in the context of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction is not associated with worse in-hospital mortality or the outcomes of major adverse cardiac events., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with poor prognosis. We sought to determine the merits of percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-only revascularization (COR) compared with multivessel revascularization (MVR) approach. Multiple databases were queried to identify relevant articles. Data were analyzed using a random-effect model to calculate unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and relative risk. A total of 28 studies comprising 26,892 patients, 18,377 in the COR and 8,515 in the MVR group were included. The mean age of patients was 63 years, comprising 72% of male patients. The baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were comparable. On a median follow-up of 1-year, COR was associated with a significantly higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; OR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 1.70, p = 0.005), angina (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.85, p ≤ 0.00001) and revascularization (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.54, p = 0.002) compared with patients undergoing MVR for STEMI. The all-cause mortality (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.53, p = 0.22), cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.72, p = 0.07), rate of heart failure (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.59, p = 0.31), need for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.64, p = 0.19), repeat myocardial infarction (MI) events (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.64, p = 0.15) and risk of stroke (OR 1.27 95% CI 0.68 to 2.34, p = 0.45%) were similar between the two groups. A subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration and study design mostly followed the results of the pooled analysis except that the risk of repeat MI events were significantly lower in the MVR group across RCTs (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.94, p = 0.009). In contrast to the culprit-only approach, MVR in patients with STEMI is associated with a significant reduction in MACE, angina and need for revascularization., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine the relative merits of 1 agent over the other. Multiple databases were queried to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies. Random-effects model was used to calculate an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for major adverse cardiovascular and cerbrovascular events (MACCE) and its components. A total of 27 (7 RCTs, 20 observational cohort studies) studies comprising 118,266 (prasugrel 62,716, ticagrelor 51,196) patients were included. At 30 days, prasugrel was associated with a significantly lower odds of MACCE (OR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.85, p ≤0.0001) and mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.71, p ≤0.0001). At 1 year, the overall odds of mortality favored prasugrel (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92, p = 0.002), but no significant interdrug difference was seen in terms of MACCE (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05, p = 0.16). There was no significant difference in the odds of overall myocardial infarction, revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding events between the 2 groups on both 30-day and 1-year follow-up. A subgroup analysis of RCTs data showed no significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor in terms of any end point at all time points. In conclusion, prasugrel might have lower odds of MACCE and mortality at 30 days. However, there was no difference in the safety and efficacy end points of 2 drugs at 1 year. The observed transient prasugrel-related mortality benefits were subject to the bias of nonrandomized assignment., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Little is known about the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on management strategies and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its subtypes, and whether these trends have changed over time. All AMI hospitalizations from the National Inpatient Sample (2004 to 2014) were analyzed and stratified by zip code-based median household income (MHI) into 4 quartiles (poorest to wealthiest): 0th to 25th, 26th to 50th, 51st to 75 th , and 76th to 100th. Logistic regression was performed to examine the association between MHI and AMI management strategy and in-hospital clinical outcomes. A total of 6,603,709 AMI hospitalizations were analyzed. Patients in the lowest MHI group had more co-morbidities, a worse cardiovascular risk factor profile and were more likely to be female. Differences in receipt of invasive management were observed between the lowest and highest MHI quartiles, with the lowest MHI group less likely to undergo coronary angiography (63.4% vs 64.3%, p <0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (40.4% vs 44.3%, p <0.001) compared with the highest MHI group, especially in the STEMI subgroup. In multivariable analysis, the highest MHI group experienced better outcomes including lower risk (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals) of mortality (0.88; 0.88 to 0.89), MACCE (0.91; 0.91 to 0.92) and acute ischemic stroke (0.90; 0.88 to 0.91), but higher all-cause bleeding (1.08; 1.06 to 1.09) in comparison to the lowest MHI group. In conclusion, the provision of invasive management for AMI in patients with lower SES is less than patients with higher SES and is associated with worse in-hospital clinical outcomes. This work highlights the importance of ensuring equity of access and care across all strata SES., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The present study examined the rates and trends of clinical outcomes and management strategies of non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) related hospitalizations in the United States, in patients with concomitant AF compared with those in sinus rhythm (SR). We analyzed the "Nationwide Inpatient Sample" database (2004 to 2014) for patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, and further stratified the cohort on the basis of diagnoses into SR and AF groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association between AF and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (composite of mortality, stroke, and cardiac complications) and its components. Of 4,668,737 NSTE-ACS hospitalizations, the proportions of SR and AF groups were 82.4% (3,848,202) and 17.6% (820,535), respectively. The incidence of AF increased significantly over time from 16.5% (2004) to 19.3% (2014). The AF group was at a greater risk of adverse outcomes with higher rates and adjusted relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (12.9% vs 5.3%; RR 1.74 [1.72, 1.75]), mortality (6.5% vs 3.3%; RR 1.12 [1.11, 1.13]), stroke (2.7% vs 1.5%; RR 1.32 [1.30, 1.34]), and bleeding (14.7% vs 8.8%; RR 1.42 [1.41, 1.43]). Furthermore, the AF group was less likely to receive coronary angiography (47.1% vs 58%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (18.7% vs 32.6%) in comparison to SR (p <0.001 for all outcomes). In conclusion, patients with concomitant AF and NSTE-ACS are less likely to be offered an invasive management strategy for their ACS and are associated with worse complications and higher mortality., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chest pain is a common reason for admission to hospital and little is known regarding 30-day unplanned readmissions after an admission with a primary discharge diagnosis of nonspecific chest pain. We analyzed patients with a primary diagnosis of nonspecific chest pain in the Nationwide Readmission Database who were admitted in 2010 to 2014. Rates, causes, and predictors of 30-day unplanned readmissions were determined. A total of 1,842,270 patients had a diagnosis of nonspecific chest pain. The 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 8.6%. From 2010 to 2014, there was an increase in 30-day unplanned readmissions from 8.1% to 9.5%. The majority of 30-day unplanned readmissions were for noncardiac reasons (73.4%). The 3 most prevalent noncardiac causes for readmissions were neuropsychiatric (10.9%), gastrointestinal (10.5%), and infections (9.9%), while the 3 most prevalent cardiac causes were coronary artery disease including angina (8.4%), arrhythmias (6.6%), and heart failure 5.5%. The strongest predictors of readmission were alcohol misuse ([OR] odds ratio 1.74 95% [CI] confidence interval 1.66-1.81), renal failure (OR 1.82 95%CI 1.76-1.87), cancer (OR 2.40 95%CI 2.27-2.53), discharge to a nursing home (OR 2.26 95%CI 2.18-2.34), and discharge against medical advice (OR 1.94 95%CI 1.86-2.02). The rate of 30-day unplanned readmission was 6.1% among those who received any test compared to 9.3% in those who did not receive any test. Rates of early unplanned readmissions occur following 1 in 12 admissions for nonspecific chest pain with noncardiac causes being the most common reason. Patients who receive a cardiovascular investigation appear to have fewer unplanned readmissions., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)