Search

Recent findings in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving oral anticoagulation showed that diabetes without insulin therapy has a thromboembolic risk comparable to nondiabetic patients, whereas only diabetic patients on insulin have a heightened thromboembolic risk. We explored possible pathophysiological correlates of such finding on 90 AF patients on oral anticoagulation, divided according to diabetes status (n = 30 without diabetes; n = 29 with diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs; n = 31 with insulin-requiring diabetes). We assessed von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentration (VWF:Ag) and activity (VWF R:Co) as measures of endothelial dysfunction; and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2) levels as markers of fibrinolytic activity and thrombin generation. Values of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and TAFI were similar in the 3 groups. Patients with diabetes requiring insulin had significantly higher levels of F1+2 (median 23.1 pg/ml [interquartile range 17.6; 33.5]) than those without diabetes (16.3 pg/ml [11.5; 22.5], p = 0.036) and diabetic patients on oral antidiabetic drugs (20.6 pg/ml [13.3; 29], p = 0.046). Thus, in AF patients receiving oral anticoagulation, those with diabetes, regardless of the diabetes type (with or without insulin therapy), and those without diabetes have comparable indices of the explored parameters of endothelial dysfunction and fibrinolytic activity. Despite anticoagulant therapy, thrombin generation is selectively higher in diabetic patients' on insulin than in those without diabetes or with diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs, with no differences between these latter 2 conditions. Thrombin generation might thus be a predominant contributor to the excess of thromboembolic risk in AF patients on insulin-requiring diabetes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

No comprehensive data are available on the role of platelet indexes (PI) in the periprocedural risk stratification of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to investigate the relation of PI to platelet reactivity (PR) and periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients receiving PCI. A total of 502 PCI patients had preprocedural measurement of PI and PR, the latter assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Study end points were incidence of PMI and high platelet reactivity (HPR) according to tertiles of PI and evaluation of PI in HPR patients. Incidence of PMI in the overall population was 6.6%. Rates of PMI were not different in PI tertiles: platelet count (I: 6.0%, II: 7.1%, III: 6.5%; p = 0.74), mean platelet volume (MPV, I: 6.6%, II: 7.3%, III: 5.8%;p = 0.86), platelet distribution width (I: 7.2%, II: 7.2%, III: 5.8%;p = 0.74), and MPV/P ratio (I: 6.6%, II: 6.0%, III: 7.1%; p = 0.91). The occurrence of PMI was significantly different in PR tertiles (I: 3%, II: 5.4%, III: 11.4%; p = 0.006). Platelet count and MPV/P ratio were significantly different in patients with and without HPR (221.8 ± 58.6 × 103/µL vs207 ± 59.4 × 103/µL, p = 0.008; 51.73 ± 15.17 vs 56.7 ± 18.3, p = 0.002).In conclusion, this study showed no relation between PI and PMI in PCI patients but confirms the association of HPR with increased incidence of PMI; thus, PI seem to be not able to identify patients at higher periprocedural risk, but monitoring PR by a bedside assay remains a useful tool for risk stratification., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a marker of cardiovascular risk. The potential relation between NLR and periprocedural myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We enrolled 502 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI. Blood samples were drawn in all patients at baseline, 6 hours, and 24 hours after PCI for complete blood cell count and cardiac biomarkers (creatine kinase-MB and troponin T [Tn-T]) assessment. NLR was calculated as the ratio between the absolute number of neutrophil over the absolute number of lymphocyte. Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) was defined according to the 2012 universal definition of myocardial infarction. In the overall population, a significant postprocedural increase in NLR was observed (3.255 [2.763 to 3.995] at baseline, 4.430 [3.390 to 6.020] at 6 hours, 4.720 [3.940 to 5.750] at 24 hours, p <0.0001). PMI occurred in 33 patients (6.6%). Baseline NLR was similar in patients with and without PMI (3.250 [2.820 to 3.885] vs 3.260 [2.750 to 4.000], p = 0.898); however, patients who developed PMI showed significantly higher NLR both at 6 hours (5.750 [4.360 to 9.095] vs 4.370 [3.370 to 5.950], p <0.001) and 24 hours (5.180 [4.440 to 8.065] vs 4.670 [3.920 to 5.710], p = 0.003). Among patients who developed PMI, periprocedural NLR increase showed a moderate positive correlation with both creatine kinase-MB (rho = 0.377, p = 0.031) and troponin T increase (rho = 0.506, p = 0.003). In conclusion, preprocedural NLR values do not impact on the occurrence of PMI during elective PCI; however, PCI procedures induce a significant increase in NLR that seems to be proportional to the magnitude of periprocedural myocardial damage., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Body circumferences have been proposed as potential anthropometric measures for the assessment of cardiometabolic risk as they are independently associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. The aim of this study was to validate neck and wrist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as practical markers of metabolic dysfunction and atherosclerosis; 120 subjects who underwent coronary angiography and carotid Doppler ultrasound were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Exclusion criteria were history of diabetes, acute myocardial infarction, body mass index (BMI) <18.5 or ≥45.0 kg/m(2). Metabolic dysfunction was ascertained by the calculation of visceral adiposity index (VAI) and by diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MS). Advanced atherosclerotic disease was defined as ≥70% coronary lumen and/or ≥50% carotid lumen stenosis. No association between body circumferences and VAI or MS was found in subjects with BMI <25 kg/m(2). VAI was significantly related to waist-to-hip ratio (R(2) = 0.09, p = 0.008), neck (R(2) = 0.09, p = 0.007), and wrist circumferences (R(2) = 0.05, p = 0.041) in subjects with BMI ≥25 kg/m(2). In overweight subjects, higher gender-specific tertiles of wrist circumference were independently associated with an increased risk of MS (odds ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 5.96, p = 0.028). VAI was independently associated with carotid intima-media thickness: β = 0.104, R(2) = 0.118, p = 0.003. Carotid intima-media thickness and MS, but not body circumferences, were associated with advanced atherosclerosis. In conclusion, these data indicate that anthropometric measurements, in particular wrist circumference, can be used as practical tools for assessment of metabolic risk in overweight-obese subjects but not as markers of advanced atherosclerosis., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) may concur to endogenous vascular repair. Previous studies have reported that statin treatment increases EPC levels. We investigated whether this occurs in patients on long-term statin treatment who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). In a phase A study, 53 patients (atorvastatin reload [AR] 80 mg 12 hours before + 40 mg 2 hours before PCI, n = 27; placebo [P], n = 26) were evaluated for EPC mobilization as CD45dim/CD34+/CD133+/KDR+ cell number by flow cytometry. Assays were run at randomization (12 hours before PCI, R), immediately before PCI (T0) at 8 (T8) and 24 hours (T24). In phase B study, 50 patients (AR, n = 25; P, n = 25) were evaluated for early colony formation by Hill colony forming unit (CFU) assay, with sampling at randomization and 24 hours later. In phase A, EPCs levels were similar at randomization between 2 arms (0.23% [0.14 to 0.54] of total events in AR vs 0.22% [0.04 to 0.37] in P group; p = 0.33). At PCI, EPC levels were higher in AR arm (0.42% [0.06 to 0.30] vs 0.19% [0.06 to 030]; p = 0.009). Higher EPC levels in AR group were also found at 8 and 24 hours. In phase B, EPC CFUs/well numbers at randomization were similar in the 2 arms (8 [6 to 12] in AR vs 12 [6 to 20] in P group, p = 0.109). EPC CFU/well at 24 hours became significantly higher in AR arm (17 [10 to 23] vs 5 [2 to 13], p = 0.002). In conclusion, high-dose AR before PCI in patients on long-term statin therapy promptly increases EPCs mobilization, which are capable of early colony formation and may contribute to cardioprotection., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major cause of failure of percutaneous coronary intervention. The efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients with high-risk clinical features are largely unknown. We enrolled 82 consecutive patients at high risk of bleeding with angiographically significant (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) ISR of bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES), treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon. All patients presented at least one of the following criteria: high bleeding risk, neoplasm, chronic inflammatory disease, and need for noncardiac surgery. Dual antiplatelet therapy was indicated for 4 weeks after the procedure. At angiographic follow-up, overall late lumen loss was 0.24 ± 0.32 mm, with no significant difference between BMS-ISR and DES-ISR (0.25 ± 0.35 vs 0.22 ± 0.30 mm, p = 0.714). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for major adverse clinical events-free survival at 3 years was 81.4% (82.3% in BMS-ISR vs 79.4% in DES-ISR, log-rank p = 0.866). No stent thrombosis has been recorded. In conclusion, the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon seems to be associated with favorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for BMS-ISR or DES-ISR in patients with high-risk clinical features and could be considered as a reasonable option in the presence of systemic co-morbidities and contraindications to long-term dual antiplatelet therapy., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Limited data are available on long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) in elderly patients who underwent PCI. A total of 635 consecutive patients aged ≥75 years who underwent PCI were enrolled at 2 European centers. Of these, 170 patients received at least 1 DES, whereas 465 patients received bare metal stent (BMS) only. Primary end point was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as the occurrence of ischemic events or bleeding events, and was compared at a median follow-up of 31.2 months. Clinical follow-up information was available in 593 patients (93.4%). The duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was 12.3±5.1 months in the DES group and 3.8±7.4 months in the BMS group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of NACE at 5 years was significantly lower in DES-treated patients (40.5%) than in BMS-treated patients (55.7%; p=0.009). This benefit was driven by a significant reduction in myocardial infarction (8.6% vs 16.6%; p=0.038) and target vessel revascularization rates (7.9% vs 21.9%; p=0.003) in the DES group, with no significant increase in the incidence of bleeding events (13.8% vs 12.2%; p=0.882). These results were confirmed at propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis. In conclusion, in patients≥75 years, the use of DES compared with BMS seems to reduce myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates at long-term follow-up, without an increase in bleeding despite longer duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. This net clinical benefit, resulting from persistent efficacy and safety over time, may support the use of DES as a reasonable option in patients≥75 years., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on residual platelet reactivity (PR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still debatable. We sought to investigate the interaction between PR and renal function and the related clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated with PCI. Immediately before PCI, we measured PR (as P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs]) in 800 patients on clopidogrel with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. High PR was defined as a PRU value of ≥240 and low PR as a PRU value of ≤178. Based on a glomerular filtration rate of < or ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, patients were respectively grouped into those with or without moderate-to-severe CKD. Primary end point was the incidence of 30-day net adverse clinical events (NACEs). Patients with moderate-to-severe CKD (n=173, 21.6%) and those without showed similar PRU values (208±67 vs 207±75, p=0.819). Yet, NACEs were significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD (19.7% vs 9.1%, p<0.001), in terms of both ischemic (12.1% vs 7.2%, p=0.036) and bleeding events (8.7% vs 2.1%, p<0.001). NACEs were significantly higher when moderate-to-severe CKD was associated with either high PR or low PR (25.4%, p for trend<0.001); this association was the strongest predictor of NACE at multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.6, p<0.001). In conclusion, we did not find an association between moderate-to-severe CKD and residual PR on clopidogrel. However, the association of moderate-to-severe CKD with either high or low PR was a strong determinant of adverse events after PCI., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Whether an additional clopidogrel load in patients receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with clinical benefit has not been well characterized. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in a randomized protocol, the safety and effectiveness of clopidogrel reload for patients with ACS undergoing PCI in the background of chronic clopidogrel therapy. A total of 242 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS with >10 days of clopidogrel therapy randomly received a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel 4 to 8 hours before PCI (n = 122) or placebo (n = 120). The primary end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization). The primary end point occurred in 4.1% of patients in the reload arm versus 14.1% in the placebo arm (odds ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.73, p = 0.013). This benefit in the reload arm was mainly from the prevention of periprocedural myocardial infarction (4.1% vs 13%, p = 0.02) and was paralleled by lower periprocedural platelet reactivity. The aggregometry data were consistent with the clinical outcome. No difference was found in the bleeding outcomes between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the results from the Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty (ARMYDA-8 RELOAD-ACS) trial have shown a significant clinical benefit from reloading patients with ACS receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy before PCI. These data might be relevant in clinical practice, given the large number of patients with ACS who are still currently treated with clopidogrel during PCI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) remains the main predictor of restenosis rates and cardiovascular events following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) despite the use of drug-eluting stents (DES). HbA1c <6.0% is considered an index of optimized metabolic control in patients with DM, but several studies are downsizing its role in the clinical management of these patients. Increasing evidence points at the role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in restenosis pathogenesis independently on Hb1AC levels. Thus, we investigated the predictive value of preprocedural AGE levels for in-stent restenosis in a population of euglycaemic diabetic patients undergoing PCI with DES implantation. One hundred twenty-five consecutive patients with DM in optimized glycemic control admitted for stable angina pectoris and treated with elective DES implantation at a tertiary hospital were prospectively included. The primary end point of the ARMYDA-AGEs study was to compare rates of angiographic ISR at 6 months after the intervention according to pre-PCI levels of AGEs. Secondary end points were the correlations of AGE levels with occurrence of periprocedural myocardial damage, major adverse cardiac events, and in-stent late loss at 6-month control coronary angiography. AGE levels >17 μM was found to be an independent predictor of ISR at 6 months and stent lumen loss. AGEs failed to predict occurrence of secondary endpoints. In conclusion, elevated AGE levels predict occurrence of in-stent restenosis after DES implantation in patients with DM on optimized glycemic control and might represent a dosable marker of adverse outcome after PCI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The incremental predictive value of high inflammatory status and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) on the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and/or HPR with the incidence of PMI in patients who undergo PCI. Five hundred consecutive patients treated with clopidogrel who underwent PCI had preprocedural measurement of CRP levels and platelet reactivity using the point-of-care VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Elevated inflammatory status was defined as CRP >3 mg/L and HPR as P2Y12 reactivity units ≥240. The primary end point was the incidence of PMI in relation to platelet reactivity and/or inflammatory status. Rates of PMI were increased in patients with CRP levels >3 mg/L (10.9% vs 4.6% in those with normal levels, odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.5, p = 0.015) and in patients with HPR (11% vs 5.5% in those without HPR, odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.4, p = 0.018). The occurrence of PMI was highest in the subgroup with HPR and high inflammatory status (16.6% vs 3.6% in patients with CRP ≤3 mg/L and P2Y12 reactivity units <240, odds ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 12.6, p = 0.008). HPR in association with elevated CRP levels resulted in a significant increase in the discriminatory power of a model including clinical and procedural variables in predicting PMI (area under the curve 0.811, p = 0.041). In conclusion, in patients who undergo PCI, baseline stratification according to platelet reactivity and inflammatory status may identify those at higher risk for PMI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH), with decreased bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin versus UFH in selected PCI patients at high bleeding risk. Four hundred one consecutive patients who underwent PCI fulfilling ≥ 1 enrollment criterion (age >75 years, chronic renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) were randomized to bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg/kg followed by infusion during the procedure; n = 198) or UFH (75 IU/kg; n = 203). In the overall population, 39% were aged >75 years, 22% had renal failure, 63% had diabetes, and 29% had acute coronary syndromes. The primary efficacy end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization). The primary safety end point was the occurrence of any bleeding or entry-site complications after PCI. All patients were preloaded with clopidogrel 600 mg. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used at the operators' discretion. Thirty-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 11.1% in the bivalirudin group and 8.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.56); the primary efficacy end point was reached mainly because of periprocedural myocardial infarction; 1 patient in the bivalirudin group had stent thrombosis. Occurrence of the primary safety end point was 1.5% in the bivalirudin group and 9.9% in the UFH group (p = 0.0001); this benefit was essentially driven by the prevention of entry-site hematomas >10 cm (0.5% vs 6.9%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin (ARMYDA-7 BIVALVE) indicates that bivalirudin, compared with UFH, causes significantly lower bleeding and has a similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with older age, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure who undergo PCI., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) impairs clinical outcome in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether short-term high-dose atorvastatin load decreases the incidence of CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Statin-naive patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI (n = 241) randomly received atorvastatin (80 mg 12 hours before intervention with another 40-mg preprocedure dose, n = 120) or placebo (n = 121). All patients had long-term atorvastatin treatment thereafter (40 mg/day). Primary end point was incidence of CIN defined as postintervention increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dl or >25% from baseline. Five percent of patients in the atorvastatin arm developed CIN versus 13.2% of those in the placebo arm (p = 0.046). In the atorvastatin group, postprocedure serum creatinine was significantly lower (1.06 ± 0.35 vs 1.12 ± 0.27 mg/dl in placebo, p = 0.01), creatinine clearance was decreased (80.1 ± 32.2 vs 72.0 ± 26.6 ml/min, p = 0.034), and C-reactive protein peak levels after intervention were decreased (8.4 ± 10.5 vs 13.1 ± 20.8 mg/l, p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that atorvastatin pretreatment was independently associated with a decreased risk of CIN (odds ratios 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.97, p = 0.043). Prevention of CIN with atorvastatin was paralleled by a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.007). In conclusion, short-term pretreatment with high-dose atorvastatin load prevents CIN and shortens hospital stay in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI; anti-inflammatory effects may be involved in this renal protection. These results lend further support to early use of high-dose statins as adjuvant pharmacologic therapy before percutaneous coronary revascularization., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Platelet reactivity predicts ischemic outcomes in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but the correlation of heightened platelet response with bleeding has not been characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether low platelet reactivity by point-of-care measurement after clopidogrel administration correlates with bleeding complications of PCI. A total of 310 patients receiving clopidogrel before PCI were prospectively enrolled. Platelet reactivity was measured with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The primary end point was the 30-day incidence of major bleeding or entry-site complications according to quartile distribution of P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with preprocedural PRU levels in the lowest quartile compared to those in the highest quartile (10.1% vs 1.3%, p = 0.043), due mainly to entry-site hemorrhages. Absolute PRU levels were lower in patients with major bleeding (171 ± 49 vs 227 ± 68 in patients without, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, pre-PCI PRU levels in the first quartile were associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk for major bleeding (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 25.9, p = 0.01). By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for the primary end point was a pre-PCI PRU value ≤ 189 (area under the curve 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.87, p = 0.001). In conclusion, this study suggests that an enhanced response to clopidogrel may be associated with higher risk for early major bleeding or entry-site complications in patients who undergo PCI. Point-of-care monitoring of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration may help identify patients in whom individualized strategies are indicated to limit bleeding complications after coronary intervention., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The effect of periprocedural platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients taking clopidogrel and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on platelet reactivity measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and on periprocedural outcomes in patients receiving clopidogrel and undergoing PCI. A total of 285 consecutive clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing elective PCI were included. Platelet function analysis was performed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. High platelet reactivity (HPR) after clopidogrel was defined as a platelet reaction unit value > or =240. Cardiac biomarkers were measured before and 8 and 24 hours after intervention. Patients with DM had significantly higher platelet reactivity before PCI compared to nondiabetics (214 +/- 83 vs 193 +/- 68 platelet reaction units, p = 0.02). HPR was more frequently observed in diabetics (36% vs 22%, p = 0.01) before PCI. Patients with DM had an increased incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI; 11% vs 4%, p = 0.04). When the entire population was divided by the presence or absence of DM and HPR, patients with DM and HPR presented the highest incidence of periprocedural MI (p for trend = 0.0008). HPR was an independent predictor of periprocedural MI (odds ratio 8.34, 95% confidence interval 2.60 to 26.76, p = 0.0003). In conclusion, patients with DM undergoing PCI have higher platelet reactivity at the time of PCI despite adequate clopidogrel pretreatment and subsequently worse periprocedural outcomes. Point-of-care platelet function testing may help to identify patients at higher risk of periprocedural MI., (2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In patients with diabetes mellitus, outcome after drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare metal stent (BMS) implantation remains under investigation; although lower reintervention rates were reported, incidence of death and myocardial infarction (MI) during follow-up is not completely characterized. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of available randomized studies evaluating follow-up events of DESs versus BMSs in patients with diabetes mellitus. Randomized trials reporting outcome of DES versus BMS in diabetic patients with a follow-up > or =6 months were included. Outcomes analyzed were (1) death, (2) MI, (3) in-stent restenosis (ISR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), and (4) stent thrombosis. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A total of 9 trials, including 1,141 patients, were found. ISR occurred in 8% of patients with DESs versus 41% of those with BMSs (odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95 confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.20, p <0.00001) and TLR in 8% versus 27% (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33, p <0.00001). There was no difference in the incidence of stent thrombosis (1.1% vs 1.2%, p = 0.98) or death (2.4% vs 2.3%, p = 0.91). MI occurred in 3.5% of patients with DESs versus 7.2% of those with BMSs (52% risk decrease, p = 0.02). Decrease of ISR with DESs was observed in noninsulin-treated (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.26, p <0.00001) and insulin-treated (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.37, p <0.00001) patients. In conclusion, diabetic patients receiving DESs have lower risk of ISR and TLR versus those treated with BMSs; use of DESs in patients with diabetes mellitus significantly decreases the incidence of MI during follow-up, without affecting mortality or stent thrombosis.

Recent studies have reported a higher incidence of late stent thrombosis in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES). Reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is considered a risk factor for this complication after both bare-metal stent (BMS) and DES implantation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of DES on long-term follow-up in patients with LV dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We retrospectively selected all patients with an EF <45% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of > or =1 sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent at our institution. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality, retrieved using both Social Security Database and hospital records. We also compared the results of this group with a historical cohort of patients with LV dysfunction undergoing BMS implantation; 121 patients who received > or =1 DES were enrolled. The mean LVEF was 36 +/- 8%, with 20 patients (16%) with a LVEF < or =25%; 36 patients (30%) had diabetes mellitus, and DES implantation was considered off-label in 100 patients (83%). Survival at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88 to 100), 90% (95% CI 82 to 98) and 88% (95% CI 80 to 96), respectively. In conclusion, the favorable results of this study demonstrate the safety of DES in patients with LV dysfunction.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing angiography. This study investigated whether statins decrease incidence of CIN in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evaluated the influence of such potential benefit on long-term outcome. Four-hundred thirty-four patients undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled and followed up to 4 years. Patients were stratified according to preprocedural statin therapy (260 statin treated, 174 statin naive). CIN was defined as a postprocedural increase in serum creatinine of >or=0.5 mg/dl or>25% from baseline. Follow-up assessment included 4-year occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Statin-treated patients had a significantly lower incidence of CIN (3% vs 27%, p<0.0001; 90% risk decrease) and had better postprocedural creatinine clearance (80+/-20 vs 65+/-16 ml/min, p<0.0001). Benefit of statin before treatment was observed in all subgroups, except in patients with a pre-existing creatinine clearance<40 ml/min. During follow-up, CIN was a predictor of poorer outcome; 4-year survival free of major adverse cardiac events was highest in statin-treated patients without CIN (95%, p

Combined antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is pivotal to minimize periprocedural adverse events in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there is debate on the best clopidogrel loading dose. The investigators performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the optimal clopidogrel loading dose. Pertinent trials comparing high (>300 mg) and standard (300 mg) clopidogrel loading doses in patients scheduled for catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention were systematically searched in BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and PubMed (December 2006). The primary end point was the 1-month rate of death or myocardial infarction. Secondary end points included other ischemic and bleeding adverse effects. Peto odds ratios were computed. A total of 10 studies (7 randomized, 3 nonrandomized) were included, enrolling 1,567 patients (712 loaded with 300 mg, 11 with 450 mg, 790 with 600 mg, and 54 with 900 mg). Overall, a high loading dose proved significantly superior to a standard loading dose in preventing cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.90, p = 0.02), without any statistically significant increase in major or minor bleedings (p = 0.55 and p = 0.98, respectively). Sensitivity analysis restricted to randomized trials confirmed the superiority of a high loading dose regimen (p = 0.0031). Meta-regression disclosed a significant interaction between event rate and the benefits of high loading doses (p = 0.005), suggesting that the greater the underlying risk, the greater the favorable impact of a high loading dose. In conclusion, a high clopidogrel loading dose (>300 mg) significantly reduces early ischemic events in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention.

The effect of treatment with steroid-eluting stents on systemic inflammatory response was investigated in patients with unstable angina pectoris or recent myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous intervention. Compared with controls, dexamethasone-eluting stents significantly reduced C-reactive protein peak levels 48 hours after the procedure; this effect persisted for 7 days and was particularly evident in patients with elevated (>/=3 mg/L) preprocedural C-reactive protein values. Patients receiving a dexamethasone-eluting stent had lower adverse events during follow-up.

Elevated plasma levels of inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), have been associated with adverse outcome in selected patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with coronary angioplasty or stenting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of preprocedural interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) plasma levels for long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in a series of unselected patients with symptomatic CAD treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Seventy-three consecutive patients (62 men, aged 62 +/- 9 years) undergoing PCI were enrolled in a prospective follow-up study. IL-1Ra and CRP plasma levels were measured before the procedure; 36 patients (49%) had unstable angina pectoris on admission, 37 (51%) had chronic stable angina pectoris, and 30 (41%) had multivessel CAD, 15 of whom underwent multivessel PCI. Success was achieved in all 73 patients, with coronary stenting performed in 63 (86%). Follow-up clinical assessment included occurrence of MACE at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Logistic regression analysis, performed to determine independent predictors of MACE, identified IL-1Ra levels in the upper quartile as the only independent predictive factor of MACE at 18 months (19% in the fourth quartile vs 0% in the first quartile; p = 0.032). Patients with high preprocedural CRP levels (fourth quartile) had a nonsignificant increased risk of MACE (p = 0.09). Thus, preprocedural IL-1Ra plasma levels appear to be a valuable independent predictive factor of MACE in unselected patients undergoing PCI.

Diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) is considered unfavorable for interventional procedures; however, the results of stenting of diffuse CAD have not been completely characterized. We performed stenting in 100 consecutive patients with diffuse CAD, defined as significant stenosis >20 mm (n = 59 patients), multiple significant stenoses in the same artery (n = 23 patients), or significant narrowing involving the whole length of the coronary artery (n = 18 patients). Angiographic success was achieved in 103 arteries (100%) and clinical success was obtained in all 100 patients. There were no deaths; no patient had stent closure, acute myocardial infarction, or required emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. All 100 patients had >6 months follow-up (mean 18 +/- 7 months, range 7 to 31); 77 (77%) remained asymptomatic, and 5 (5%) had acute myocardial infarction, of whom 2 died (2%). In-stent restenosis was observed in 12 patients (12%) and repeat angioplasty was performed in 10. Including those patients who underwent repeat angioplasty, 89 (89%) maintained clinical improvement and 95 (95%) were alive and free of bypass surgery during follow-up. Life-table analysis showed 86% freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 28 months. Thus, selected patients with diffuse CAD may be treated with satisfactory acute and long-term results by stent implantation.

Axial angiograms of 54 patients with a univentricular heart were reviewed to determine the anatomic details demonstrated by this technique. The main ventricular chamber was of left ventricular morphology in 36, right ventricular morphology in 13 and indeterminate in 5 patients. Forty-three patients had a rudimentary ventricular chamber that was supporting a great artery in 35 patients. eighteen patients had separate atrioventricular (A-V) valves. In four of them, one A-V valve was overriding the trabecular septum, but predominantly committed to the main ventricular chamber. Eleven patients had a single right and 13 a single left A-V valve; a common A-V valve was present in 12. The techniques used provided good demonstration of the morphology of the ventricular mass, particularly the position and orientation of a septum when present. They also delineated the morphology of the A-V valve or valves and their precise ventricular connection. Ventriculoarterial connections and relations were readily determined. It is concluded that these methods are superior to isolated frontal and lateral views and provide thorough demonstration of the intracardiac anatomy of patients with a univentricular heart.