Search

Because heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are different clinical entities with differing demographic characteristics, common HF outcomes may occur at different rates. Comparative outcome studies have been equivocal, and studies comparing resource utilization are scant. We used an observational cohort design to study 6,513 patients hospitalized for HF who had an EF measured during the hospitalization and were discharged alive within 30 days. We excluded 677 patients with borderline EF values (41% to 49%) and categorized the remaining as HFrEF (EF ≤40%, n = 2,205) and HFpEF (EF >50%, n = 3,631). Patients were followed for up to 1 year for all-cause re-hospitalization and mortality and annualized medical resource utilization. Patients with HFrEF and HFpEF experienced similar adjusted incidence rates of re-hospitalization, but those with HFrEF had a 39% increased risk of mortality at 30 days (rate ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.76) and 25% greater risk at 1 year (rate ratio1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.41). After adjustment for covariates, patients with HFpEF incurred significantly more annualized outpatient visits (21.5 vs 20.1, p = 0.002) and emergency room visits (3.24 vs 2.94, p = 0.002) than those with HFrEF, but absolute differences were small. High inpatient and pharmacy utilization did not differ. Our study suggests that whether a patient has HFrEF or HFpEF has little bearing on risk of re-hospitalization or inpatient resource utilization in the year after an HF hospitalization. Both groups experienced high mortality, but those with HFrEF had greater risk. In conclusion, from the standpoint of resource use, HF can be considered a single entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) hospitalization length of stay (LOS) has been associated with the risk of subsequent readmission and mortality. We identified 19,927 hospitalized patients with HF who were discharged alive from 2008 to 2011 from 3 Kaiser Permanente regions. In adjusted Cox models using LOS 3 to 4 days as the reference category, shorter LOS was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions. LOS of 5 to 10 days was associated with 17% greater risk of readmission within 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 1.28) and 9% greater risk within 1 year (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.15). LOS of 11 to 29 days was associated with increased readmission risk of 52% at 30 days (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.76) and 25% at 1 year (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.35). Mortality risk within 30 days among those with LOS of 1 day was 47% lower (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.65) and 32% lower at 1 year (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.74). LOS of 2 days was associated with lower mortality risk of 17% (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90) at 1 year. At LOS 5 to 10 days, 30-day and 1-year risk of mortality was increased by 52% (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.76) and 25% (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.35), respectively. LOS of 11 to 29 days was associated with 171% higher mortality risk at 30 days (HR 2.71, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.35) and 73% at 1 year (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.97). Longer LOS during the index HF hospitalization was associated with readmission and mortality within 30 days and 1 year independent of co-morbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. These results suggest that LOS may be a proxy for the severity of HF during the index hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High triglyceride (TG) levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with higher medical costs. We analyzed the economic impact of TG-lowering therapies and whether the association between medical costs and therapy differed according to TG reduction. We conducted an observational cohort study of 184,932 patients with diabetes mellitus who had a TG measurement between January 2012 and June 2013 and a second TG measurement 3 to 15 months later. We identified 4 therapy groups (statin monotherapy, TG-specific monotherapy, statin/TG-specific combination therapy, or no therapy) and stratified those groups by percent change in TG (increased ≥5%, change of ≤4.9%, decreased 5% to 29%, decreased ≥30%). We compared change in medical costs between the year before and after therapy, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 184,932 total patients, 143,549 (77.6%) received statin monotherapy, 900 (0.5%) received TG-specific monotherapy, 1,956 (1.1%) received statin and TG-specific combination therapy, and 38,527 (20.8%) received no prescription lipid agents. After covariate adjustment, statin/TG-specific agent recipients had a mean 1-year total cost reduction of $1,110. The greatest cost reduction was seen among statin/TG-specific combination therapy patients who reduced TG levels by ≥30% (-$2,859). Statin monotherapy patients who reduced TG by ≥30% also had a large reduction in adjusted costs (-$1,079). In conclusion, we found a substantial economic benefit to treating diabetic patients with statin/TG-specific combination lipid therapy compared with monotherapy of either type or no lipid pharmacotherapy. A TG reduction of ≥30% produced a particularly large reduction in 1-year medical costs., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)