1. Comparative Outcomes of Left Main and Nonleft Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from the Excellence in Coronary Artery Disease (XLCAD) Registry.
- Author
-
Stoler RC, Jeong M, Akram T, Monhollen A, Vazquez DF, Mamawala M, Witt TA, Bruneman B, Weideman S, Adelman KS, Sharma S, Furqan Y, Rosol ZP, Rengarajan R, Schussler JM, Vallabhan RC, Chugh Y, Yoon DA, Feghali GA, Velasco CE, Sayfo S, Al-Azizi KM, Mixon TA, Widmer RJ, Potluri SP, and Banerjee S
- Abstract
Background: There are limited comparative data on real-world outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left main (LM) and non-LM coronary arteries., Methods: Total 873 consecutive patients undergoing LM PCI (n = 256) and non-LM PCI (n = 617) were enrolled between September 2019-March 2023 in the Excellence in Coronary Artery Disease (XLCAD) Registry. Primary outcome was 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven repeat revascularization and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcome was periprocedural (≤30 days) events., Results: Study cohort included 68% men, mean age 71.9 ± 10.3 in LM and 67.2 ± 11.1 years in non-LM PCI groups (p <0.001). LM PCI patients had significantly greater co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction, prior coronary revascularization, peripheral artery disease, chronic lung and kidney disease and heart failure) compared with non-LM. Acute coronary syndrome indication was the most prevalent (69%). Mechanical circulatory support was employed in 3.1% LM vs 1% non-LM PCI patients (p = 0.026). Mean number of lesions treated were 2.2 ± 1.0 in LM and 1.4 ± 0.6 in non-LM PCI groups (p <0.001). Multivessel PCI was performed in 68.8% LM and 21% non-LM PCI patients (p <0.001). Overall, drug-eluting stent use (96.7%), bifurcation PCI (24.7%) and atherectomy (2.4%) were similar across groups. Technical and procedural success rates were high across groups, however significantly higher in non-LM group. Periprocedural (≤30 days postprocedure) events included mortality in 3.5% LM and 1.5% non-LM PCI (p = 0.334) and MACE 4.7% LM vs 2.4% non-LM PCI (p = 0.080) groups. One-year MACE was significantly higher in LM versus non-LM PCI (12.9% vs 8.4%, respectively; p = 0.043), driven mainly by higher repeat percutaneous revascularization in LM group (12.1% vs 6.2%; p = 0.003). Mortality at 1-year in LM vs non-LM PCI were 10.2% vs 5.8% (p = 0.074)., Conclusion: In a real-world experience, LM PCI is performed in patients with significantly greater comorbidities compared with non-LM PCI, with high procedural success. Thirty-day mortality and 1-year MACE are significantly higher in LM group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Subhash Banerjee: Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, Kaneka; Research grants (institutional): Boston Scientific Corporation, Abbott Vascular, General Electric, Esperion, Novartis, AngioSafe. Robert Stoler: Proctor and advisory board: Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Edwards Advisory board: Biotronik. Zachary Rosol: Speaker: Shockwave, Penumbra. Sameh Sayfo: Consultant: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Shockwave, Inari, Penumbra, Cagent, Angiodynamic, Terumo, Surmodic, Imperative Care; Advisory Board: Cagent, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF