Search

Real-life data comparing the long-term outcome in patients with different heart diseases carrying an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the long-term risk of the first appropriate ICD intervention and overall survival in patients with ICD and heart disease of different etiologies. Patients with an ICD implanted between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022, followed in our center were included. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD intervention. A comparison between ischemic heart disease (IHD) and non-IHD (NIHD) was performed. In NIHD different etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were analyzed. Overall, 1184 patients (592 IDH; 592 NIHD) were included. During a median follow-up of 53 months all-cause death occurred in 399 patients (34%) whereas first appropriate ICD intervention occurred in 320 (27%). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in IHD vs NIHD patients (60% vs 43%; p <0.0001) but no differences in appropriate ICD intervention rate at 10 years (34% vs 40%; p = 0.125) were observed. In patients with NIHD, a higher 10-year mortality rate was found in valvular heart disease, post-radio/chemotherapy DCM (rctDCM), and hypertensive DCM. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, alcoholic DCM, and rctDCM were the least arrhythmic phenotypes in NIHD. Of note, inappropriate interventions in alcoholic DCM and rctDCM were higher than appropriate ones. In conclusion, the rate of ICD-appropriate interventions and mortality is different according to the etiology of heart disease and cardiovascular risk profile; this should be taken into consideration in the prognostic stratification of these patients at the time of implantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There is limited evidence on characterization and natural history of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT)-induced left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The aim of this work was to characterize clinical features and long-term evolution of SVT-induced LV dysfunction. Patients consecutively admitted with sustained SVT and heart rate >100 bpm as the only known cause of a new onset LV systolic dysfunction (i.e., LV ejection fraction [EF] <50%) were analyzed. Patients were then revaluated periodically. Recovered LVEF (i.e., ≥50%) and a composite of death, heart transplant or first episode of major ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated as study end-points. We enrolled 83 patients. After SVT therapy, 56 (67%) showed a recovered LVEF at the last follow-up of median 54 (interquartile range 36 to 87) months. Seventeen (30%) of those patients had a temporary new drop in LVEF during follow-up associated to high-rate SVT relapse. At presentation, patients with recovered LVEF were younger (52 vs 67 years respectively, p <0.001) and had higher LVEF (34% vs 27% respectively, p = 0.005) compared to non-recovered LVEF patients. Finally, 4% of recovered LVEF patients vs 26% of nonrecovered LVEF patients experienced death/heart transplant/major ventricular arrhythmias during follow-up (p = 0.004). In conclusion, after almost 5 years of follow-up, two-thirds of patients with high-rate SVT causing a newly diagnosed LV systolic dysfunction recovered and maintained normal LV function after SVT control, with a subsequent benign outcome. Long term individual surveillance is required in those patients, as arrhythmic recurrences and new drops in LVEF are common in the long term., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Arrhythmic risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) remains a major concern. As the ventricles remodel in time, risk factors for arrhythmic death may change. A cohort of 710 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, without previous ventricular arrhythmias, was retrospectively studied to understand how risks vary in time. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions. The prediction of the arrhythmic outcome was assessed dynamically through landmark analysis. Patients were assessed at baseline, short term (12 months, interquartile range 6 to 18), and long-term (72 months, interquartile range 60 to 84). The strongest risk predictors at each evaluation were combined in 3 multivariate models. During a median follow-up of 102 months, 80 patients (11%) experienced the primary end point. At baseline, QRS duration (p = 0.008), disease duration (p <0.001), and mitral regurgitation (p = 0.010) were significantly associated with the primary end point. The 12 months' landmark model included disease duration (p = 0.049), syncope (p = 0.005), New York Heart Association classes III and IV (p = 0.02), and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p = 0.001). Finally, the 72 months' landmark model combined the indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p = 0.048), the left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.008), and the left atrial area (p = 0.001). All the 3 models provided a satisfactory accuracy (area under the curve ranging from 0.76 to 0.82, p <0.001). With an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, the natural course of the disease influences the effect of arrhythmic risk factors overtime. Different predictors should be considered for the risk stratification according to the timing of assessment. Impaired left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly associated with major arrhythmias only in the long term., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are no parameters predicting the individual probability of "full response" to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this work was to find prognostic factors of full clinical and echocardiographic responses (i.e., ≥50% left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and New York Heart Association class I) after 1 year of CRT. This was a prospective follow-up study that involved 2 hospitals. Patients (n = 75) with advanced heart failure (64 ± 9 years of age, 87% men, LVEF 24 ± 7%) who received CRT were followed for 17 ± 9 months. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of full CRT response. A nomogram predicting the individual probability of full CRT response during follow-up was calculated. There were 13 patients with restoration of normal LVEF versus 62 without (mean LVEF 56% ± 5% vs 31% ± 8%, respectively, p <0.001). Predictors of full response included cause of heart disease, baseline QRS width, and degree of QRS shortening in response to CRT. Patients with nonischemic heart disease, baseline QRS width ≤150 ms, and QRS shortening ≥40 ms in response to CRT had a >75% probability of restoration of normal LVEF. In conclusion, our nomogram using a combination of cause, baseline QRS width, and degree of QRS shortening in response to CRT allows assessment of individual probability of full response. This observation awaits further confirmation from larger series., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)