1. Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Agents on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Weight Excess Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Author
-
Rômulo Sperduto Dezonne, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho, Virgínia Genelhu de Abreu, Luiz Felipe da Silva Figueiredo, and Emilio Antonio Francischetti
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Obesity ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Stroke ,Antihypertensive Agents ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Cardiometabolic Risk Factors ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Atenolol ,Losartan ,Valsartan ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Heart failure ,Relative risk ,Hypertension ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Obesity hypertension is an ongoing pandemic. The first-line medications to treat this condition are still subject to debate. We compared diuretics, calcium-channel blockers (CCB), beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as an initial antihypertensive therapy for prevention of cardiovascular morbimortality of hypertensive individuals who are overweight or obese. We conducted a search of the literature for randomized clinical trials in which at least 50% of the participants were overweight or obese. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, or end-stage renal disease. Our search yielded 16 randomized studies. Comparisons of two classes of drugs with at least two studies indicated that (1) CCB and ACEI increased the risk of HF [relative risk (RR) = 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–4.40] and stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13; 1.00–1.26]), respectively, compared to diuretics; and (2) CCB showed a reduction in stroke (HR = 0.77; 0.66–0.89) and total mortality (HR = 0.94; 0.87–1.01) compared to the BB atenolol. Comparisons of two classes of antihypertensive medications with only one study showed that the risk of MI was higher with ARB valsartan versus CCB (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.38, p = 0.02). In contrast, losartan lowered the risk of a composite cardiovascular outcome compared to atenolol (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77–0.98, p = 0.02). In hypertensive subjects with excess weight, diuretics are more effective for preventing HF and stroke than CCB and ACEI, respectively. CCB are a good first-line choice for prevention of cardiovascular disease, except HF.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF