1. A comparison of three different methods for the determination of estrogen receptors in human breast cancer
- Author
-
Terence J. Cudahy, Bo Nordenskjöld, Bernt Boeryd, and Birgitta Franlund
- Subjects
Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Acrylic Resins ,Estrogen receptor ,Breast Neoplasms ,Biology ,Antibodies ,Breast cancer ,Cytosol ,Positive predicative value ,medicine ,Humans ,Staining and Labeling ,Isoelectric focusing ,Assay ,Antibodies, Monoclonal ,Estrogens ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Immunohistochemistry ,Staining ,Receptors, Estrogen ,Polyclonal antibodies ,biology.protein ,Female ,Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ,Isoelectric Focusing ,Gels - Abstract
Forty-seven cases of breast cancer were analyzed for estrogen receptors (ERs) by three different techniques: (1) a biochemical assay using isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel; (2) a monoclonal ER immunocytochemical assay (ERICA, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics Division), and (3) a polyclonal antiestradiol immunohistochemical technique using formalin-fixed tissue. A high level of agreement (85%) was noted between the biochemical assay and ERICA. The ERICA-processed slides showed minimal background staining and were easy to interpret. Compared with the biochemical assay, ERICA achieved a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 82%. In contrast, results from the polyclonal antiestradiol histologic technique did not correlate with biochemical results and showed positive and negative predictive values of 61% and 25%, respectively. The authors conclude that the ERICA technique should prove to be a valuable adjunct to traditional biochemical ER assays.
- Published
- 1988