Search

Objective: To determine prospectively the causes of upper GI hemorrhage (UGIH) in alcoholics, focusing on the prevalence of alcoholic gastropathy, and to compare the etiology of bleeding in patients who drink alcohol to that of nondrinkers. Methods: From August 1, 1990 through September 9, 1994, all patients evaluated by the gastroenterology consultative service at a large inner-city hospital presenting with UGIH were prospectively identified. Patients had to have a subnormal hematocrit on or within 12 h of admission or a fall of at least 5 points from a previous baseline determination to be included. Upper GI endoscopy was performed in all patients within 48 h of admission. Alcohol use was quantitated as chronic (80 g or more per day for at least 1 month), binge, occasional, or none. Results: Over the 4-yr study period, 727 patients met the inclusion criteria, and of these, 212 (29%) were classified as chronic alcohol users. Overall, peptic ulcer disease was the most common cause of bleeding (60%). Gastropathy (diffuse subepithelial hemorrhage) was considered etiological in only 32 patients (4%). The most common causes of gastropathy were portal hypertension in 22 patients and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in five. Only three patients were identified in whom alcoholic gastropathy was considered etiological; in these patients, bleeding was mild and self-limited. When the causes of bleeding were compared between drinkers and nondrinkers, drinkers were more likely to bleed from varices (p = 0.024) or other portal hypertension-related causes (p < 0.01), whereas peptic ulcer was more common in nondrinkers compared with chronic users (67 vs 53%; p < 0.01). Esophagitis (p = 0.95) and Mallory-Weiss tear (p = 0.15) prevalences were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: In the actively drinking patient, the most common causes of UGIH are peptic ulcer and disorders related to portal... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Although the presence of oropharyngeal (OP) candidiasis plays an important role in the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with esophageal symptoms, there is little information on the utility of OP findings in patients with esophageal ulceration. Methods: Over a 54-month period, all HIV-infected patients with esophageal ulceration had careful inspection of the oropharynx at the time of presentation with esophageal complaints and at endoscopy. HIV-infected patients without esophageal ulceration undergoing endoscopy during the last 30 months had OP findings similarly documented. OP ulceration was not routinely biopsied. The cause of esophageal ulceration was determined based on clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings. Results: Of the 124 patients identified with esophageal ulcer, 14 (11%) had coexistent OP ulceration: herpes simplex virus, four; idiopathic esophageal ulcer, four; cytomegalovirus, three; herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus, two; idiopathic and cytomegalovirus, one. Four patients had OP ulcer without esophageal ulcer; only one of these patients had esophageal symptoms. All OP lesions healed with therapy for the esophageal ulcer. Twenty-eight patients with esophageal ulcer had OP candidiasis (23%); 21 of these patients (75 %) also had Candida esophagitis. The sensitivity and specificity of OP ulcer for esophageal ulcer were 11% and 97%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of OP candidiasis for esophageal candidiasis were 90% and 82%, respectively. Conclusions: OP ulceration is uncommon in patients with esophageal ulceration, with the exception of herpes simplex virus esophagitis. OP candidiasis is common in patients with underlying esophageal ulcer, potentially resulting in diagnostic confusion. OP candidiasis appears to be a moderately useful diagnostic marker for Candida esophagitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a letter to the editor about a study on mucosal biopsies by R. W. Goodgame et al published in a 1993 issue of the "American Journal of Gastroentorology."