1. Diisocyanate-exposed auto body shop workers: A one-year follow-up
- Author
-
Mark R. Cullen, Carole Holm, B.A. Coren, Adam V. Wisnewski, Meredith H. Stowe, and Carrie A. Redlich
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,One year follow up ,Body shop ,Air Pollutants, Occupational ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Occupational Exposure ,Internal medicine ,Paint ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Medicine ,Cyanates ,Aged ,Asthma ,Analysis of Variance ,Chi-Square Distribution ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Occupational Diseases ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,chemistry ,Turnover ,Female ,Hexamethylene diisocyanate ,business ,Automobiles ,Occupational asthma ,Developed country ,Follow-Up Studies ,Isocyanates - Abstract
Background Diisocyanates currently are the most commonly identified cause of occupational asthma in industrialized countries. Auto body shops, a common hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) exposure setting, are difficult to study due to their small size and episodic exposures. Objectives A 1-year follow-up was undertaken as an adjunct to the cross-sectional SPRAY study (Survey of Painters & Repairers of Auto bodies by Yale) to investigate the effects of HDI on auto body shop workers over time and whether or not the healthy worker effect may exist in this industry. Methods and Results Forty-eight workers from seven shops were re-contacted. Thirty-four subjects who stayed at the same shop and 11 who left their original shop participated. No statistically significant changes in physiology, symptoms, and immunologic responses from baseline to follow-up were noted. However, significant differences between those who left the shops and those who stayed were noted. Those who left were younger, less experienced in the industry, and more likely to have a history of asthma (23 vs. 3%; P
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF