1. Recipient Obesity and Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Mate-Kidney Analysis
- Author
-
Rita L. McGill, Pratik B. Shah, Bhavna Chopra, Michelle A. Josephson, and Kalathil K Sureshkumar
- Subjects
Adult ,Graft Rejection ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Article ,Body Mass Index ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Obesity ,Kidney transplantation ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Confounding ,Graft Survival ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Kidney Transplantation ,Transplant Recipients ,Treatment Outcome ,Nephrology ,Female ,business ,Body mass index ,Cohort study - Abstract
Rationale & Objective The impact of extreme recipient obesity on long-term kidney transplant outcomes has been controversial. This study sought to evaluate the association of various levels of recipient obesity on kidney transplantation outcomes by comparing mate-kidney recipient pairs to address possible confounding effects of donor characteristics on posttransplant outcomes. Study Design Nationwide observational cohort study using mate-kidney models. Setting & Participants In analysis based on the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database, 44,560 adult recipients of first-time deceased-donor kidney transplants from 2001 through 2016 were paired by donor. Predictors Recipient body mass index (BMI) categorized as 18-25 (n = 12,446), >25-30 (n = 15,477), >30-35 (n = 11,144; obese), and >35 (n = 5,493; extreme obesity) kg/m2. Outcomes Outcomes included patient survival, graft survival, death-censored graft survival, delayed graft function (DGF), and hospital length of stay. Analytical Approach Conditional logistic regression and stratified proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes as odds ratios and hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for recipient and transplant factors, using recipients with a BMI >35 kg/m2 as a reference. Results At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, adjusted odds ratios for DGF were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.62), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.83) for BMI 18-25, >25-30, and >30-35 kg/m2, respectively (P 25-30 kg/m2 (HRs of 0.66 [95% CI, 0.59-0.74] and 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.88], respectively; P 30-35 kg/m2 (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81-1.02]; P = 0.09). Length of stay and patient survival did not differ by recipient BMI. Limitations Observational study with limited detail regarding potential confounders. Conclusions Despite an increased risk of DGF likely unrelated to donor organ quality, long-term transplant outcomes among recipients with a BMI >35 kg/m2 are similar to those among recipients with a BMI >30-35 kg/m2, supporting a flexible approach to kidney transplantation candidacy in candidates with extreme obesity.
- Published
- 2020