Search

The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is a prospective, observational study designed to elucidate aspects of hemodialysis practice that are associated with the best outcomes for hemodialysis patients. In DOPPS I, 308 hemodialysis units from 7 countries participated, including 145 facilities from the United States (1996-2001), 62 facilities from Japan (1999-2001), and 101 facilities from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (all 1998-2000). DOPPS II (2002-2004) has included 320 hemodialysis units and more than 12,400 hemodialysis patients from the 7 DOPPS I countries as well as Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand, and Sweden. Dialysis units are chosen via a stratified random selection procedure to provide proportional sampling by region and type of facility within each country. In DOPPS I and II, longitudinal data have been collected from both a prevalent (cross-sectional) patient sample and an incident patient sample. Data have also been collected on numerous facility practice patterns. Most DOPPS analyses incorporate both facility- and patient-level data in regression-based analyses to investigate predictors of survival, hospitalization, quality of life, vascular access type, and other outcomes. DOPPS longitudinal data also help identify trends in subject characteristics, practice indicators, medication use, and outcomes. The DOPPS remains a unique source of data on hemodialysis patients and facilities. It continues to refine its methods of data collection and analysis with the goal of improving hemodialysis practice and end-stage renal disease patient lives worldwide.

Hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) predispose to systemic atherosclerosis with renal involvement. The prevalence of HTN and DM in cadaveric renal donors (affected donors) and the results of transplantation are unknown. We investigated these issues with national data from the US Renal Data System. A total of 4,035 transplants from affected donors were matched 1:1 with unaffected controls according to donor age and race, recipient race, and year of transplantation. Graft and patient survival were estimated. Among the 25,039 solitary renal transplantations performed between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997, cadaveric renal transplants from donors with HTN accounted for 15%, and donors with DM, 2%. Programs with 1-year cadaveric renal graft survival rates greater than 90% had 50% less affected donors compared with programs having 1-year cadaveric renal graft survival rates of 85% or less. Compared with donor-age-matched controls, transplants from affected donors were at minimally increased risk for primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, and acute rejection. Three-year graft survival rates were 71% in affected donor organs and 75% in controls (P = 0.001). Compared with controls, duration of HTN was an independent risk factor for graft survival (3-year graft survival rates, 75% versus 65%; relative risk = 1.36 for HTN >10 years; P < 0.001). A substantial fraction of cadaveric renal donors have preexisting HTN. Programs transplanting fewer affected donor kidneys had better than average results. Because the negative impact of donor HTN and DM on transplant outcome was of moderate degree except when the duration of donor HTN was greater than 10 years, use of affected donors should not be discouraged, but graft and patient survival analyses should account for their presence.