Search

Patient tracers and leadership WalkRounds proactively identify quality and safety issues. However, these programs have been inconsistent in application, results, and sustainability. The goal was to identify a more consistent and efficient approach to survey health care facilities. The authors developed a Peer-to-Peer Interdisciplinary Patient Tracer program to assess compliance with National Patient Safety Goals and to proactively identify areas of inpatient, ambulatory, and procedural risk. The program has been operational for more than 5 years, with continued expansion annually. In all, 96% of frontline leadership reported satisfaction; 100% reported that they would recommend the program to others (Kirkpatrick level 1 results). Mean absolute change in performance scores from 2014 to 2018 was 15%. All survey findings triggered the development of an improvement project. This novel integrated program advanced institutional improvement by strengthening internal peer-to-peer surveillance, engaging leadership, and creating an accountability structure for internal improvement efforts.

Patient–provider communication has been recognized as a critical area of focus for improved health care quality, with a mounting body of evidence tying patient satisfaction and provider communication to important health care outcomes. Despite this, few programs have been studied in the emergency department (ED) setting. The authors designed a communication curriculum and conducted trainings for all ED clinical staff. Although only 72% of clinicians believed the course would be a valuable use of their time before taking it, 97% reported that it was a valuable use of their time after ( P < .001). Pre-course self-evaluation of knowledge, skill, and ability were high. Despite this, post-course self-efficacy improved statistically significantly. This study suggests that it is possible, in a brief training session, to deliver communication content that participants felt was relevant to their practice, improved their skills and knowledge, changed their attitude, and was perceived to be a valuable use of their time.

Safety assessment codes (SACs) are one method to evaluate adverse events and determine the need for a root cause analysis. Few facilities currently use SACs, and there is no literature examining their interrater reliability. Two independent raters assigned frequency, actual harm, and potential harm ratings to a sample of patient safety reports. An actual and potential SAC were determined. Percent agreement and Cohen's κ were calculated. Substantial agreement existed for the actual SAC (κ = 0.626, P < .001), fair agreement for the potential SAC (κ = 0.266, P < .001), and low agreement for potential harm (κ = 0.171, P = .002). Although there is subjectivity in all aspects of assigning SACs, the greatest is in potential severity. This presents a problem when using the potential SAC and is in agreement with previous literature showing significant subjectivity in determining potential harm. An operational framework is needed to strengthen reliability.

Despite decades of investment in patient safety, unintentional patient harm remains a major challenge in the health care industry. Peer-to-peer assessment in the nuclear industry has been shown to reduce harm. The study team’s goal was to pilot and assess the feasibility of this approach in health care. The team developed tools and piloted a peer-to-peer assessment at 2 academic hospitals: Massachusetts General Hospital and Johns Hopkins Hospital. The assessment evaluated both the institutions’ organizational approach to quality and safety as well as their approach to reducing 2 specific areas of patient harm. Site visits were completed and consisted of semistructured interviews with institutional leaders and clinical staff as well as direct patient observations using audit tools. Reports with recommendations were well received and each institution has developed improvement plans. The study team believes that peer-to-peer assessment in health care has promise and warrants consideration for wider adoption.

The Harvard Fellowship in Patient Safety and Quality is a 2-year physician-oriented training program with a strong operational orientation, embedding trainees in the quality departments of participating hospitals. It also integrates didactic and experiential learning and offers the option of obtaining a master's degree in public health. The program focuses on methodologically rigorous improvement and measurement, with an emphasis on the development and implementation of innovative practice. The operational orientation is intended to foster the professional development of future quality and safety leaders. The purpose of this article is to describe the design and development of the fellowship.