1. Interrater Agreement and Detection Accuracy for Medium-Vessel Occlusions Using Single-Phase and Multiphase CT Angiography
- Author
-
Johanna M. Ospel, Rosalie McDonough, Mayank Goyal, Ondrej Volny, Wu Qiu, Bijoy K Menon, Fouzi Bala, and Nima Kashani
- Subjects
Computed Tomography Angiography ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Brain Ischemia ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medium vessel ,Occlusion ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular diseases ,Single phase ,Stroke ,Ischemic Stroke ,Retrospective Studies ,Thrombectomy ,Interventional ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,musculoskeletal, neural, and ocular physiology ,Thrombolysis ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Cerebral Angiography ,Inter-rater reliability ,Angiography ,Neurology (clinical) ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,psychological phenomena and processes ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background and purpose Accurate and reliable detection of medium-vessel occlusions is important to establish the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and initiate appropriate treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy. However, medium-vessel occlusions are often challenging to detect, especially for unexperienced readers. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interrater agreement of the detection of medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CTA. Materials and methods Single-phase and multiphase CTA of 120 patients with acute ischemic stroke (20 with no occlusion, 44 with large-vessel occlusion, and 56 with medium-vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation) were assessed by 3 readers with varying levels of experience (session 1: single-phase CTA; session 2: multiphase CTA). Interrater agreement for occlusion type (large-vessel occlusion versus medium-vessel occlusion versus no occlusion) and for detailed occlusion sites was calculated using the Fleiss κ with 95% confidence intervals. Accuracy for the detection of medium-vessel occlusions was calculated for each reader using classification tables. Results Interrater agreement for occlusion type was moderate for single-phase CTA (κ = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62) and almost perfect for multiphase CTA (κ = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83). Interrater agreement for detailed occlusion sites was moderate for single-phase CTA (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.53-0.56) and substantial for multiphase CTA (κ = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.74). On single-phase CTA, readers 1, 2, and 3 classified 33/56 (59%), 34/56 (61%), and 32/56 (57%) correctly as medium-vessel occlusions. On multiphase CTA, 48/56 (86%), 50/56 (89%), and 50/56 (89%) medium-vessel occlusions were classified correctly. Conclusions Interrater agreement for medium-vessel occlusions is moderate when using single-phase CTA and almost perfect with multiphase CTA. Detection accuracy is substantially higher with multiphase CTA compared with single-phase CTA, suggesting that multiphase CTA might be a valuable tool for assessment of medium-vessel occlusion stroke.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF