1. Computed tomography: Does it really improve the treatment of cervical carcinoma?
- Author
-
Deborah J. Dotters, David H. Moore, and Wesley C. Fowler
- Subjects
Cervical cancer ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Medical record ,Carcinoma ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Improved survival ,Computed tomography ,medicine.disease ,Cervical cancer staging ,Evaluation Studies as Topic ,Lymphatic Metastasis ,Cervical carcinoma ,Humans ,Medicine ,Female ,Radiology ,Tomography ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Cancer staging - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if computed tomography in cervical cancer staging resulted in treatment modifications leading to improved survival. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 246 consecutive women treated over a 3-year period for primary cervical cancer were reviewed. Frequency of recurrence was the outcome measure of interest and subjected to χ 2 analysis. RESULTS: Only eight patients had improved survival from treatment modifications based on computed tomography findings. Eight patients underwent additional surgical procedures because of computed tomography findings that proved to be erroneous. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high cost and limited benefit, computed tomography for cervical cancer staging is not recommended.
- Published
- 1992
- Full Text
- View/download PDF