1. Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality
- Author
-
Louise F. Wilson, Suzanne C. Dixon-Suen, Penelope M. Webb, Louise M. Stewart, Susan J. Jordan, Karen M. Tuesley, and Melinda M. Protani
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,Hysterectomy ,Proportional hazards model ,Obstetrics ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Mortality rate ,Hazard ratio ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Oophorectomy ,Cancer ,Disease ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cohort ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business - Abstract
Background Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynecological surgeries, with an estimated 30% of women in Australia undergoing the procedure by age 70. In the USA, about 45% of women have a hysterectomy in their lifetime. Some studies have suggested this procedure increases the risk of premature mortality. With many women making the decision to have a hysterectomy for a benign indication each year, additional research is needed to clarify whether there are long-term health consequences of hysterectomy. Objective Our aim was to examine the association between hysterectomy for benign indications, with or without removal of the ovaries, and cause-specific and all-cause mortality. Study Design Our cohort of 666,588 women comprised the female population of Western Australia with linked hospital and health records from 1970 to 2015. We used Cox regression models to assess the association between hysterectomy and all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer and other mortality by oophorectomy type (categorized as none, unilateral and bilateral), with no hysterectomy or oophorectomy as the reference group. We repeated these analyses using hysterectomy without oophorectomy as the reference group. We also investigated whether associations varied by age at the time of surgery, although small sample size precluded this analysis in women who had a hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. In our main analysis, women who had hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy undertaken as part of treatment for cancer were retained in the analysis and considered unexposed to that surgery. As a sensitivity analysis, we censored procedures undertaken for cancer. Results Compared to no surgery, having a hysterectomy without oophorectomy before age 35 was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (HR=1.29, 95% CI:1.19-1.40); for surgery after age 35, there was an inverse association (35-44 years: HR=0.93, 95%CI:0.89,0.97). Similarly, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with increased all-cause mortality when undertaken before age 45 (35-44 years: HR=1.15, 95%CI:1.04-1.27), but decreased mortality rates when surgery was undertaken after age 45. In our sensitivity analysis, censoring gynecological surgeries for cancer resulted in many cancer-related deaths being excluded for women who did not have surgery for benign indications, and thus increased the hazard ratios for the associations between both hysterectomy without oophorectomy and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and risk of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. The sensitivity analysis therefore potentially biased the results in favor of no surgery. Conclusion Among women having surgery for benign indications, hysterectomy without oophorectomy performed prior to 35 years and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed prior to 45 years were associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. These procedures are not associated with poorer long-term survival when performed at older ages.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF