Search

In the last decade-plus, there has been growing enthusiasm for long-acting reversible contraceptive methods as the solution to unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraceptive access efforts have primarily focused on addressing provider and policy barriers to long-acting reversible contraception and have promoted long-acting reversible contraception as first-line methods through marketing and tiered-effectiveness counseling. A next generation of contraceptive access efforts has the opportunity to move beyond this siloed focus on long-acting reversible contraception toward a focus on equity and person-centeredness. Here we define a new framework for increasing equitable access to high-quality, person-centered contraceptive care that includes programmatic elements necessary to provide information and services to address the barriers to accessing quality care, organized into a four-part continuum. The continuum is contextualized within structural, systematic, and social factors that influence experience of contraceptive care. We aim to provide a practical framework for researchers, program implementers, and policy makers to develop and evaluate efforts to improve equitable access to and quality of contraceptive care. Initiatives can intentionally be cognizant of broader structural and social factors that will influence their success and the likelihood of negative unintended consequences for marginalized groups and thus deliberately work to design programs that meet all people's contraceptive needs and support reproductive autonomy.

Background: Contraceptive choice is a preference-sensitive decision that is affected by contraceptive attributes, patient experience, and reproductive history. Familiarity with and acceptability of specific contraceptive methods may influence patient decisions., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the acceptability of and previsit familiarity with long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants) compared with depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate and oral contraceptive pills in women seeking contraceptive care and to investigate the relationship between acceptability and contraceptive choice., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a study that was designed to compare 2 contraceptive care programs conducted at 3 Midwest federally qualified health centers. After contraceptive counseling, participants completed a baseline interviewer-administered survey before the healthcare provider visit. We asked participants questions about previsit familiarity with and acceptability of the intrauterine device, implant, depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, and oral contraceptive pills. We assessed familiarity using 2 questions: (1) Before today have you ever heard of the [method]? (2) Do you know any woman who has/has used the [method]? Acceptability was assessed for each method on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being "strongly dislike" and 10 being "strongly like." We dichotomized the scores into high acceptability (7-10) and low/moderate acceptability (0-6) for analysis. We examined differences in demographic and reproductive characteristics between women with high and low long-acting reversible contraception acceptability using the chi-square test. We used univariate and multivariable Poisson regressions to examine the relationship among participants' characteristics, method acceptability, and method choice. We adjusted for any covariate that changed the effect size of acceptability by >10%., Results: There were 1007 women included in the analysis: 900 women (89%) reported that they had heard of the intrauterine device, and 592 women (59%) knew someone who had used the intrauterine device. Eight hundred sixty-five (86%) women had heard of the implant, and 636 women (63%) knew someone who had used it. Knowledge of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate and oral contraceptive pills was high (>98% for both). Five hundred seventy-six women (57%) found 1 or both long-acting reversible contraception methods highly acceptable. Women with high long-acting reversible contraception acceptability were more likely to be adolescents or aged 30-45 years, white, Hispanic, married/cohabitating, and uninsured and were less likely to desire a child in the next 1-3 years. They were more likely to desire a hormonal intrauterine device (90.5% vs 9.5%), copper intrauterine device (81.1% vs 18.9%), or implant (89.8% vs 10.2%) compared with women with low acceptability (P<.001). In adjusted analyses, women with high acceptability of an intrauterine device were more likely to desire an intrauterine device (adjusted relative risk, 9.62; 95% confidence interval, 6.42-14.42). Women with high acceptability of an implant were also more likely to desire one (adjusted relative risk, 8.74; 95% confidence interval, 6.17-12.38). Women were more likely to desire an intrauterine device or an implant if they knew someone who used the method. Previous use of the method and demographic factors were not associated with method choice., Conclusion: Previsit familiarity with intrauterine devices and implants was high in our federally qualified health centers population, although not as high as depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate and oral contraceptive pills. In adjusted analyses, women who found an intrauterine device or implant highly acceptable and who knew someone who had used the method were more likely to choose those respective methods at the end of their visit., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Research suggests the need for improvement in the patient-centeredness and comprehensiveness of contraceptive counseling. My Birth Control is a tablet-based decision support tool designed to improve women's experience of contraceptive counseling and to help them select contraceptive methods that are consistent with their values and preferences., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of My Birth Control on contraceptive continuation, experience of contraceptive care, and decision quality., Study Design: Using a cluster randomized design, randomized at the provider level, patient participants interested in starting or changing contraception interacted with My Birth Control before their family planning visit (intervention) or received usual care (control). A postvisit survey assessed experience of care method satisfaction, decision quality, and contraceptive knowledge. Surveys at 4 and 7 months assessed the primary outcome of contraceptive continuation, along with method use, satisfaction, and unintended pregnancy. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with multiple imputation for missing data were used to examine the effect of treatment assignment., Results: Twenty-eight providers participated and 758 patients enrolled between December 5, 2014, and February 5, 2016. Participants were racially/ethnically diverse; less than a quarter self-identified as white. No effect was found on 7-month continuation (56.6% and 59.6% for intervention and control group respectively, odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.22). However, assignment to the intervention group increased reporting of the greatest Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning score (66.0% vs 57.4%, odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.05), the greatest scores on the informed decision and uncertainty subscales of the Decisional Conflict Scale (50.5% vs 43.2%, odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.80 and 41.6% vs 33.3%, odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.05), and greater knowledge., Conclusion: My Birth Control had no effect on contraceptive continuation. The intervention did enhance the experience of contraceptive counseling and informed decision making, as well as contraceptive knowledge., The intervention's effect on patient experience is important, particularly given the personal nature of contraceptive decision making and the social and historical context of family planning care., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Forty-five percent of births in the United States are unintended, and the costs of unintended pregnancy and birth are substantial. Clinical and policy interventions that increase access to the most effective reversible contraceptive methods (intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants) have potential to generate significant cost savings. Evidence of cost savings for these interventions is needed., Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-savings analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, which provided counseling and no-cost contraception, to demonstrate the value of investment in enhanced contraceptive care to the Missouri Medicaid program., Study Design: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project was a prospective cohort study of 9256 reproductive-age women who were enrolled between 2007 and 2011. Study follow-up was completed October 2013. This analysis includes 5061 Contraceptive CHOICE Project participants who were current Missouri Medicaid beneficiaries or were uninsured and reported household incomes <201% of the federal poverty line. We created a simulated comparison group of women who were receiving care through the Missouri Title X program and modeled the contraception and pregnancy outcomes that would have occurred in the absence of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Data about contraceptive use for the comparison group (N=5061) were obtained from the Missouri Title X program and adjusted based on age, race, ethnicity, and income. To make an accurate comparison that would account for the difference in the 2 populations, we used our simulation model to estimate total Contraceptive CHOICE Project costs and total comparison group costs. We reported all costs in 2013 dollars to account for inflation., Results: Among the Contraceptive CHOICE Project participants who were included, the uptake of intrauterine devices and implants was 76.1% compared with 4.8% among the comparison group. The estimated contraceptive cost for the simulated Contraceptive CHOICE Project group was $4.0 million vs $2.3 million for the comparison group. The estimated numbers of unintended pregnancies and births averted among the simulated Contraceptive CHOICE Project group compared with the comparison group were 927 and 483, respectively, which represented a savings in pregnancy and maternity care of $6.7 million. We estimated that the total cost savings for the state of Missouri attributable to the Contraceptive CHOICE Project was $5.0 million (40.7%) over the project duration., Conclusion: A program providing counseling and no-cost contraception yields substantial cost savings because of the increased uptake of highly effective contraception and consequent averted unintended pregnancy and birth., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize age-group specific patterns in the stability of contraceptive use and to evaluate whether factors that are associated with nonuse and sporadic use, compared with stable use, differ by age among women who are at risk for unintended pregnancy., Study Design: We used data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth to characterize the prevalence of stable and sporadic contraceptive use and nonuse by age over a 1-year period. We used polytomous logistic regression models to assess the odds of contraceptive nonuse and sporadic use vs stable use. Age-stratified models were used to show age-group differences in associated characteristics., Results: Over a 1-year period, stable contraceptive use decreased across age groups from 80% for teens 15-19 years old to 74% for women 20-24 years old, and 70-71% for women 25-34 and 35-44 years old. Contraceptive nonuse increased across age groups from 5% for teens 15-19 years old to 9-20% for older women. By contrast, sporadic use was least common for women 35-44 years old (10% compared with 16-17% for younger women). Among teens 15-19 years old, a history of method discontinuation because of dissatisfaction was associated with nonuse. Among older women, intentions to have children in the future and reported difficulty achieving pregnancy were associated with nonuse and sporadic use., Conclusion: Because the stability of contraceptive use and associated factors differ by age, providers may need to consider these differences when talking to women about contraception. To address nonuse, helping teens identify a method that they are comfortable using may be especially important; for older women, discussing the potential for continuing fertility may be more important. To address sporadic use, discussing the benefits of user-independent methods may be helpful, with a particular emphasis on long-acting reversible contraceptives for younger women and teens who are less likely to have completed their desired childbearing and who have tended to rely on methods that are more difficult to use consistently., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the associations between prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use., Study Design: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2004-2008 data were analyzed from Missouri, New York state, and New York City (n = 9536). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the associations between prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use, defined as any method and more effective methods (sterilization, intrauterine device, or hormonal methods)., Results: The majority of women received prenatal (78%) and postpartum (86%) contraceptive counseling; 72% received both. Compared with those who received no counseling, those counseled during 1 time period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.67) and both time periods (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.87-2.89) had significantly increased odds of postpartum use of a more effective contraceptive method (32% vs 49% and 56%, respectively; P for trend < .0001). Results for counseling during both time periods differed by type of health insurance before pregnancy, with greater odds of postpartum use of a more effective method observed for women with no insurance (AOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.18-5.66) and Medicaid insurance (AOR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.98-7.06) than for those with private insurance (AOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.44-2.43) before pregnancy. Findings were similar for postpartum use of any contraceptive method, except that no differences by insurance status were detected., Conclusion: The prevalence of postpartum contraceptive use, including the use of more effective methods, was highest when contraceptive counseling was provided during both prenatal and postpartum time periods. Women with Medicaid or no health insurance before pregnancy benefited the most., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)