Search

Purpose: We aimed to describe the demographic and clinical features, ocular manifestations, complications, visual prognosis, and treatment in a large population of Turkish patients with Behçet uveitis. We also aimed to compare visual prognosis between male and female sex and between patients who presented before and after 1990.Design: Observational case series.Methods: A retrospective study of 880 consecutive patients (1,567 eyes) with Behçet uveitis seen at the Uveitis Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, from 1980 to 1998. All patients met the classification criteria of the International Study Group for Behçet''s Disease. Information on the patient''s sex, age at onset of uveitis, ocular features, ocular complications, visual acuity, and systemic treatment was collected.Results: Five hundred ninety-nine patients (68%) were male and 281 (32%) were female. The mean age at onset of uveitis was 28.5 years in male and 30 years in female patients. Ocular involvement was bilateral in 78.1% and unilateral in 21.9% of the patients. Panuveitis was the most common form in both sexes. Fundus lesions as well as sight-threatening complications were more common in males. At the beginning of the follow-up, potential visual acuity was 0.1 or less in 30.9% of eyes in males and 24.2% of eyes in females. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the risks of losing useful vision (>0.1) at 5 and 10 years for males and females as 21% vs 10% and 30% vs 17%, respectively. Male patients who presented in the 1990s had a significantly lower risk of losing vision compared with male patients who presented in the 1980s.Conclusion: Behçet uveitis starts frequently around the end of the third decade and has a male predominance. The disease is more severe and the risk of losing useful vision is higher in males than in females. However, this risk has been significantly reduced in the 1990s. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To describe Turkish patients with Fuchs uveitis syndrome (FUS). Design: Retrospective observational case series. Methods: We reviewed the records of 172 patients with FUS seen at Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, between January 1995 and July 2007. The main outcome measures were demographic features, clinical findings at presentation, laser flare photometry values, risk of new complications, and rate of decreased vision. Results: The mean age was 29.5 + 8.4 years. Male-to-female ratio was 1:1.3. Nine patients (5.2%) had bilateral involvement. The diagnosis of FUS had been made in only 10 of 115 (8.7%) referrals. Clinical findings at presentation included diffuse keratic precipitates (medium-sized round in 74.6%, fine-stellate in 22.1%), anterior chamber cells (74%), diffuse iris atrophy without hypochromia (48.6%), heterochromia (39.8%), iris nodules (32%), cataract/pseudophakia (69.1%), vitreous cells (71.8%), elevated intraocular pressure (12.7%), and chorioretinal scars (7.7%). The mean flare was 8.4 + 3.1 photons/ms in eyes with FUS and 3.7 + 0.8 photons/ms in the fellow eyes (P < .001). Hyperfluorescence of the optic disc was the only fluorescein angiographic finding, detected in 7 of 32 eyes (22%). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated risks of cataract formation and intraocular pressure elevation as 42% and 17%, respectively, at 4 years. The rate of decreased visual acuity by 2 lines or more was 0.06/eye-year. Conclusions: The referral patterns suggest that FUS is frequently misdiagnosed in Turkish patients. Diffuse medium-sized round keratic precipitates, low flare readings, iris stromal atrophy without hypochromia, and vitreous opacities in the absence of macular edema are more often helpful clues to the diagnosis than heterochromia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

PURPOSE: To describe nonglaucomatous retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects in patients with Behcet uveitis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and observational case series. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical photographs of patients with Behcet uveitis (n = 259), ocular toxoplasmosis (n = 120), and multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated uveitis (n = 40) for the presence of localized RNFL defects. Behcet patients with localized RNFL defects were invited to participate in a prospective evaluation including standard automated perimetry, spectraldomain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), and RNFL thickness analysis. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of localized RNFL defects, perimetric and SD OCT findings, and RNFL thickness analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with Behcet uveitis (24%) had localized RNFL defect(s) without any visible scar. Twenty patients (17%) with ocular toxoplasmosis had a localized RNFL defect associated with a retinochoroidal scar in all. None of the MS patients had a localized RNFL defect. Of the 19 patients (24 eyes) with RNFL defect associated with Behcet uveitis who returned for follow-up, there was a corollary thinning on SD OCT B-scan in all and a corresponding visual field defect in 83%. RNFL thickness analysis was within normal limits in 54%, but revealed thinning in the thickness profile scale in 46% and in the pie chart in 21%. CONCLUSION: In Behcet uveitis, localized RNFL defects may be caused by microvascular ischemia at the optic nerve head and/or at the posterior pole and may serve as a helpful ocular diagnostic clue and an indicator of posterior pole involvement, a risk factor for poor visual prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]