Search

Purpose Most reports of strabismus after glaucoma drainage device implantation study larger devices and rarely note the incidence of strabismus after Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation. It is unknown if the pattern of strabismus is similar with smaller devices. We investigated characteristics of strabismus after AGV implantation. Design Retrospective review. Methods Institutional study of 732 patients at our institution undergoing AGV implantation between 2013 and 2018. Rate and characteristics of strabismus were the primary outcome; age, gender, and location of AGVs were also analyzed. Results We identified 29 patients who developed new-onset strabismus postoperatively after initial AGV implantation, for 4% incidence of strabismus. Twenty-one (72%) of these had diplopia. AGVs were implanted superotemporally in 21, superonasally in 5, inferotemporally in 1, and inferonasally in 2. Three patients were esotropic, 11 were exotropic, 4 had hypertropia, 2 had hypotropia, and 9 patients had combined horizontal/vertical strabismus (esotropia/hypotropia [n = 1] or exotropia/hypertropias [n = 8]). Exotropia was the most common type of strabismus in both the superotemporal and superonasal (60%) AGV groups. Superotemporal AGVs were more commonly associated with ipsilateral hypertropia (43%) than superonasal AGVs. Treatments included strabismus surgery (n = 14), prisms (n = 6), or an occlusive lens (n = 1). Discussion. In the largest single-center series of patients undergoing initial AGV implantation, the overall incidence of postoperative strabismus was 4%. This is comparable to strabismus incidence following implantation of other types of glaucoma drainage devices, even larger devices. The possibility of this complication should be discussed with patients prior to surgery.

Purpose To test the hypothesis that baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures predict visual field (VF) progression in a cohort of patients with suspected or established glaucoma and to compare their performance to semiquantitative optic disc measures. Design This was an observational cohort study. Methods The setting of this study was an academic institution. The study population included 171 eyes of 95 patients with good-quality baseline retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular OCT images and disc photographs with >2 years of follow-up and ≥5 VFs. The observation procedures were baseline macular and RNFL OCT measures and cup-to-disc ratio and disc damage likelihood score. The main outcome measure was prediction of glaucomatous VF deterioration according to trend and event analyses. Results Median (interquartile range) baseline mean deviation and follow-up were -2.9 (-6.4 to -1.1) dB and 54 (44–65) months, respectively. Seventeen and 25 eyes progressed by final visit based on pointwise event analysis and trend analysis of visual field index (VFI), respectively. Thinner central corneal thickness (P = .005), female gender (P = .015), and thinner average peripapillary RNFL (P = .001) predicted VF progression on proportional hazard models. Thinner RNFL at baseline (P = .006) or thinner average ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (P = .028) along with higher baseline VFI (P = .018 and .048, respectively) predicted VFI progression. Neither optic disc measures predicted VF progression in any of the explored models. Conclusions Baseline structural OCT measures predicted subsequent VF progression in contrast to semi-quantitative optic disc measures. OCT-based structural measures should be included in prognostic models of glaucomatous VF deterioration.

PurposeTo review central structure-function (SF) relationships in glaucoma; to compare contributions of within-session and between-session variability to total variability of macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) thickness measurements; and to test the hypothesis that longitudinal within-eye variability of central SF relationships is smaller than between-individual variability.MethodsWe reviewed the pertinent literature on central SF relationships in glaucoma. Thirty-eight eyes (20 normal or glaucoma subjects) had×3 macular images per session over 3 sessions, and superpixels thickness measurements for ganglion cell layer (GCL), ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and full macular thickness (FMT) were exported. Linear mixed models were used for estimating contributions of between- and within-session variability to total thickness variability. One hundred twenty eyes with ≥3 10° visual fields (VFs)/OCT images were enrolled for the longitudinal study. We investigated within-eye longitudinal SF relationships (GCIPL thickness vs VF total deviations) with a change-point regression model and compared within-eye to between-individual variabilities with components-of-variance models.ResultsIn the cross-sectional study, the between-session component contributed 8%, 11%, 11%, and 36% of total variability for GCL, GCIPL, GCC, and FMT, respectively. In the longitudinal study, between-individual variability explained 78%, 77%, and 67% of total SF variability at 3.4°, 5.6°, and 6.8° eccentricities, respectively (P < .05). SF relationships remained stable over time within individual eyes.ConclusionsWithin-session variability accounts formost of macular thickness variability over time. Longitudinal within-eye SF variability is smaller than between-individual variability. Study of within-eye SF relationships could help clinicians better understand SF linking in glaucoma and help refine progression algorithms. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored bythe American Ophthalmological Society.

Purpose To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with those of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. Design Case-matched retrospective comparative case series. Methods Setting/study population: 46 DMEK procedures were matched with 46 DSEK procedures at a single institution. Observation procedures: cases were matched based on preoperative visual acuity, lens status, and surgical indication. Main outcome measurements: the outcome measurements included visual acuity improvement, primary and secondary graft failure, endothelial rejection, intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, and the need for additional glaucoma intervention. Results Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by −0.89 logMAR in the DMEK group and −0.62 logMAR in the DSEK group (P = 0.005) at 1 year follow-up. Visual acuity was significantly better in the DMEK group at postoperative months 1, 3, and 12 and at last follow-up. The percentage of patients achieving 20/40 or better best-corrected visual acuity was higher in the DMEK group at all time points, notably 47% in the DMEK group versus 15% in the DSEK group at 1 year (P = 0.002). Secondary graft failure was lower in the DMEK group (DMEK 0% vs. DSEK 17%; P = 0.006). Primary graft failure rates and rebubling rates were similar. There were no differences in the rates of postoperative IOP elevation or in the need for additional glaucoma intervention. Conclusions In complex eyes with prior glaucoma surgery, DMEK offers faster visual recovery, better final visual acuity, and a lower rate of secondary graft failure compared to DSEK during the first postoperative year and beyond.

To test the hypothesis that cataract surgery slows the apparent rate of visual field (VF) decay in primary open-angle glaucoma patients compared with rates measured during cataract progression.Retrospective cohort study.Consecutive open-angle glaucoma patients who underwent cataract surgery and who had ≥4 VFs and ≥3 years of follow-up before and after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Mean deviation (MD) rate, visual field index (VFI) rate, pointwise linear regression (PLR), pointwise rate of change (PRC), and the Glaucoma Rate Index (GRI) were compared before and after cataract surgery.A total of 134 eyes of 99 patients were included. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 6.5 (4.7-8.1) and 5.3 (4.0-7.3) years before and after cataract surgery, respectively. All intraocular pressure (IOP) parameters (mean IOP, standard deviation of IOP, and peak IOP) significantly improved (P.001) after cataract surgery. All VF indices indicated an accelerated VF decay rate after cataract surgery: MD rate (-0.18 ± 0.40 dB/year vs -0.40 ± 0.62 dB/year, P.001), VFI rate (-0.44% ± 1.09%/year vs -1.19% ± 1.85%/year, P.001), GRI (-5.5 ± 10.8 vs -13.5 ± 21.5; P.001), and PRC (-0.62% ± 2.47%/year before and -1.35% ± 3.71%/year after surgery; P.001) and PLR (-0.20 ± 0.82 dB/year before and -0.42 ± 1.16 dB/year after surgery; P.001) for all VF locations. Worse baseline MD and postoperative peak IOP were significantly associated with the postoperative VF decay rate and the change in the decay rate after cataract surgery.Although all IOP parameters improved after cataract surgery, VFs continued to progress. Cataract surgery does not slow the apparent rate of glaucomatous VF decay as compared to rates measured during the progression of the cataract.