Search

To evaluate the impact of lipid-lowering medications on diabetic retinopathy and diabetic complications requiring intervention in the US population.Retrospective cohort analysis.Administrative insurance claims were drawn from the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases. Population consisted of beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Main outcome measurements were any signs of diabetic retinopathy, as measured by diagnosis codes for nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or diabetic macular edema (DME) and procedure codes for retinopathy treatments (anti-VEGF injections, laser therapy, and vitrectomy).A population of 269,782 patients diagnosed with T2DM between 2008 and 2015 were analyzed. A total of 99,233 patients (37%) were undergoing treatment with lipid-lowering medications. Approximately 6% of patients taking lipid-lowering medications had a diagnosis code for NPDR, PDR, or DME or a procedural code for intravitreal injections, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or laser treatment in their record following diagnosis with diabetes compared to 6.5% of patients who did not take lipid-lowering medications (P0.01). In adjusted time-to-event analyses, patients who took lipid-lowering medications prior to diagnosis of T2DM were less likely to progress to any retinopathy diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.65) and less likely to receive any treatment for retinopathy (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.84). These findings were significant at the aggregate level, at the individual level of diagnosis (NPDR HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69; PDR HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.54; and DME HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.45), and at the level of each treatment category (anti-VEGF injection HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.84; laser HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81; and vitrectomy HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.85).This study found consistent evidence that patients taking lipid-lowering medications were less likely to develop NPDR, PDR, or DME and modest evidence that these patients are less likely to receive intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF medication, laser treatments, or vitrectomy. The study validates the findings of studies that have used claims databases in East Asia in relatively homogeneous populations to estimate an association between statin use and retinopathy, replicating them in a US context in a large commercial claims database.

To evaluate outcomes and disease characteristics in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration that received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) and ranibizumab every 12 weeks or longer (≥q12 weeks) or less than every 12 weeks (q12 weeks) during year 2 of VIEW studies.Post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial data.In year 1, eyes received ranibizumab q4 weeks (Rq4), IAI 2 mg q4 weeks (2q4), or IAI 2 mg q8 weeks after 3 monthly injections (2q8). In year 2, eyes received pro re nata treatment, with mandatory treatment at least q12 weeks.At week 96, 218 (42.5%), 284 (53.9%), and 245 (47.9%) eyes treated with Rq4, 2q4, and 2q8, respectively, received treatment at ≥q12-week intervals and 295 (57.5%), 243 (46.1%), and 266 (52.1%) eyes at12q-week intervals during the second year. Baseline occult-type choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (P = .0156) and retinal fluid (P.0001) and leakage (P.0001) at week 52 were associated withq12-week dosing. Mean best-corrected visual acuity gains from baseline with Rq4, 2q4, and 2q8 at ≥q12-week interval were 8.7, 9.9, and 9.7 letters at week 52 and 8.5, 8.8, and 9.2 letters at week 96, respectively. The corresponding gains withq12-week dosing were 10.3, 9.7, and 8.9 letters at week 52 and 9.1, 7.7, and 8.1 letters at week 96.Baseline CNV type other than occult and absence of retinal fluid and leakage at week 52 were significantly associated with ≥q12-week dosing. Vision improvements at week 52 following a year of fixed dosing with ranibizumab and IAI were maintained at week 96 in eyes that received treatment ≥q12 weeks andq12 weeks.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of select baseline characteristics on geographic atrophy (GA) progression in eyes receiving intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham. DESIGN Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, single-masked, sham-controlled trial. METHODS Patients with GA received 15 mg pegcetacoplan monthly or every other month (EOM), or sham injection monthly or EOM for 12 months. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in GA lesion size (square root) from baseline. Post hoc analysis evaluated the effects of age; gender; lesion size, focality, and location (extrafoveal vs foveal); pseudodrusen status; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and low-luminance deficit (LLD) on GA progression at Month 12. RESULTS Of 246 randomized patients, 192 with 12-month data were included in this analysis. Overall mean (standard deviation) change in lesion size (mm) was 0.26 (0.17) (P < .01), 0.27 (0.27) (P

Purpose To explore whether monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections are associated with a lower rate of new choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Design Retrospective data analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials. Methods Incidence of new CNV in fellow eyes was calculated at 12 and 24 months from 2 clinical trials (the Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-VEGF Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration [MARINA] study and the Anti-VEGF Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration [ANCHOR] study), based on fluorescein angiographic reading center criteria and investigator evaluation. Patients treated with monthly ranibizumab (0.3 and 0.5 mg) were compared with those receiving a sham injection (MARINA) or photodynamic therapy (ANCHOR). Results In MARINA, new CNV developed in fellow eyes in 20.3% of the 0.3-mg ranibizumab group by 12 months and in 30.4% by 24 months. The conversion rate in the 0.5-mg ranibizumab group was 21.1% and 38.0% by 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the sham group, 26.4% converted by 12 months and 36.3% converted by 24 months. In ANCHOR, fellow eyes in 15.9% of the 0.3-mg ranibizumab group converted by 12 months and fellow eyes in 23.8% converted by 24 months. The conversion rate in the 0.5-mg ranibizumab group was 24.3% and 35.1% by 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the photodynamic therapy group, 25.4% converted by 12 months and 38.8% converted by 24 months. Differences in conversion rates at 12 and 24 months between the 0.3-mg or 0.5-mg ranibizumab groups and respective controls (sham or photodynamic therapy) were not statistically significant. Conclusions Results of this study do not support the hypothesis that monthly ranibizumab injections reduce the rate of CNV development in untreated fellow eyes.