Search

Purpose: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare and aggressive form of thyroid neoplasia that requires multidisciplinary collaboration for effective management. We systematically appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the diagnosis and treatment of MTC using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify CPGs pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of MTC. Data were abstracted from guidelines meeting inclusion criteria and appraised by four independent reviewers in the six domains of quality defined by the AGREE II. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated across domains to qualify interrater reliability., Results: Fourteen guidelines met inclusion criteria. No guideline achieved a score of >60 % in five or more AGREE II quality domains, which is required to gain designation as 'high' quality. One "average quality" guideline authored by the British Thyroid Association achieved a score of >60 % in three quality domains. The remaining thirteen (92.9 %) CPGs demonstrated low quality content, with deficits most pronounced in domains 3, 5, and 6, suggesting a lack of rigorously developed, clinically applicable, and transparent information., Conclusions: As the diagnosis and treatment of MTC continues to evolve, the development of high-quality guidelines becomes increasingly important; few existing meet appropriate standards., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of indocyanine green (ICG) for image-guided resection of head and neck cancer (HNC)., Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases., Review Methods: Searches were conducted from database inception to February 2022. Patient and study characteristics, imaging parameters, and imaging efficacy data were extracted from each study., Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing 103 head and neck tumors. Weighted mean ICG dose and imaging time were 1.27 mg/kg and 11.77 h, respectively. Among the five studies that provided quantitative metrics of imaging efficacy, average ICG tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was 1.56 and weighted mean ONM-100 TBR was 3.64. Pooled sensitivity and specificity across the five studies were 91.7 % and 71.9 %, respectively., Conclusion: FGS with ICG may facilitate real-time tumor-margin delineation to improve margin clearance rates and progression-free survival. Future studies with validated, quantitative metrics of imaging success are necessary to further evaluate the prognostic benefit of these techniques., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained significant recent global interest in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. It is a relatively new, minimally invasive, thermal ablation technique that is an alternative to surgery. Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), consensus statements, and recommendations currently exist for the use of RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancers. These documents have considerable variability amongst them, and to date, their quality and methodologic rigor have not been appraised., Objective: To identify and perform a quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases from inception to November 1, 2021. Four reviewers independently evaluated each guideline using the AGREE II instrument. Scaled domain scores were generated and the threshold used for satisfactory quality was >60%. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine level of agreement between reviewers., Results: Seven guidelines were selected for final evaluation based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two guidelines were classified "high" quality, one "average" quality, and the rest "low" quality. The "Clarity and Presentation" (65.68 ± 26.1) and "Editorial Independence" (61.32 ± 25.8) domains received the highest mean scores, while the "Applicability" (32.14 ± 22.8) and "Rigor of Development" (45.02 ± 29.8) domains received the lowest mean scores. ICC statistical analysis showed high magnitude of agreement between reviewers with a range of (0.722-0.944)., Conclusion: Reflecting upon our quality appraisal, it is evident that the quality and methodologic rigor of RFA guidelines can be improved upon in the future. Our findings also elucidate the existing variability/discrepancies amongst guidelines in the indications and use of RFA., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)