Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) to screen for depression in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer and to evaluate potential patient-specific risk factors that may contribute to depression., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study at a tertiary-level hospital of outpatient adult patients with head and neck cancer who completed the PHQ-2/9 from 2019 to 2020. Patients were given a PHQ-2 during a surveillance visit. A positive PHQ-2 screen (score ≥ 3) prompted further evaluation with a PHQ-9. Patients were stratified into either low risk (PHQ-2 score < 3) or high risk (PHQ-2 score ≥ 3) for depression. Univariate regression was performed on all variables, and a multivariate logistic regression was performed on statistically significant variables (P < 0.05)., Results: In total, 110 patients were included in this study. Fifteen (14 %) patients had a positive PHQ-2 screen with a score ≥ 3 and underwent evaluation with a PHQ-9. The median PHQ-9 score was 15 (6-26). The PHQ-2 ≥ 3 group were significantly younger (59 years vs. 67 years; P = 0.03) and had a greater number of patients with a psychiatric history (33 % vs. 8 %; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: There is a strong association between a PHQ-2 score ≥ 3 and detection of depressive symptoms among patients with head and neck cancer. Younger age and pretreatment mental illness are significant risk factors for developing depression following treatment. Early screening and treatment should be considered for all patients to mitigate the burden of depression and suicide in this patient population. Further research is warranted to investigate utilization of the PHQ-2/9 to detect depression and barriers that exist for timely screening and interventions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained significant recent global interest in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. It is a relatively new, minimally invasive, thermal ablation technique that is an alternative to surgery. Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), consensus statements, and recommendations currently exist for the use of RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancers. These documents have considerable variability amongst them, and to date, their quality and methodologic rigor have not been appraised., Objective: To identify and perform a quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases from inception to November 1, 2021. Four reviewers independently evaluated each guideline using the AGREE II instrument. Scaled domain scores were generated and the threshold used for satisfactory quality was >60%. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine level of agreement between reviewers., Results: Seven guidelines were selected for final evaluation based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two guidelines were classified "high" quality, one "average" quality, and the rest "low" quality. The "Clarity and Presentation" (65.68 ± 26.1) and "Editorial Independence" (61.32 ± 25.8) domains received the highest mean scores, while the "Applicability" (32.14 ± 22.8) and "Rigor of Development" (45.02 ± 29.8) domains received the lowest mean scores. ICC statistical analysis showed high magnitude of agreement between reviewers with a range of (0.722-0.944)., Conclusion: Reflecting upon our quality appraisal, it is evident that the quality and methodologic rigor of RFA guidelines can be improved upon in the future. Our findings also elucidate the existing variability/discrepancies amongst guidelines in the indications and use of RFA., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Although concurrent chemoradiation is increasingly used for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, many elderly patients receive radiation alone due to toxicity concerns. We evaluate acute and late toxicity among patients age ≥ 65 who received concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer., Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary care center., Participants: Between 6/2003 and 8/2011, 40 consecutive patients age ≥ 65 underwent combined chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Ten patients were treated in the postoperative setting and 30 underwent definitive chemoradiation. Twenty-eight patients received concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and 12 received concurrent weekly paclitaxel. Treatment plans were designed to provide a dose of 66-72 Gy at 2-2.12 Gy/fraction to >95% of the gross tumor volume in the definitive setting or for positive margins and 60-66 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction post-operatively. Median follow-up was 23.2 months (range: 0-94.4 months)., Main Outcomes Measures: Acute skin and mucosal toxicity, unplanned treatment interruptions, and chronic treatment related toxicity including gastrostomy tube dependence as graded by the CTCAE v3.0., Results: Eight patients (20%) required a radiation treatment break of ≥ 3 days. Thirteen (33%) required unplanned hospitalization during or immediately following treatment. No grade 4+ skin or mucosal toxicity was noted. Five patients remained PEG tube dependent at >1 year. One patient developed non-healing mandibular osteoradionecrosis >3 years following chemoradiation. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 55%., Conclusion: Higher-than-expected rates of in-patient hospitalization with significant acute toxicity were noted in this cohort with a correspondingly high rate of radiation treatment breaks. Late toxicity rates were similar to those observed in historical controls with younger patients. Careful patient selection criteria should be employed for elderly patients considering concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer., (© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine outcomes among patients treated for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) of the head and neck., Study Design: Retrospective review., Methods: The records of 16 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic SNUC were analyzed. Initial treatment consisted of: surgery alone (6 patients), surgery with post-operative chemoradiotherapy (4 patients), and primary radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (6 patients)., Results: The median survival for patients treated by surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy was 30 months compared to 7 months and 9 months for patients treated by surgery alone and upfront chemoradiotherapy, respectively (p=0.20). The 2-year locoregional control was 18% for patients treated with upfront chemoradiotherapy, 37% for patients treated with surgery alone, and 78% for patients treated with surgery plus chemoradiotherapy (p=0.49)., Conclusion: While the potential role of selection bias must be considered, multi-modality therapy using surgery and post-operative chemoradiotherapy yielded the most favorable outcomes for SNUC and should be recommended whenever feasible., (© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)