Search

Objective 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHP) has been recommended by professional societies for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth, but subsequent clinical studies have reported conflicting efficacy results. This study aimed to contribute to the evidence base regarding the effectiveness of 17-OHP in clinical practice using real-world data. Study Design A total of 4,422 individuals meeting inclusion criteria representing recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) were identified in a database of insurance claims, and 568 (12.8%) received 17-OHP. Crude and propensity score-matched recurrence rates and risk ratios (RRs) for the association of receiving 17-OHP on recurrent sPTB were calculated. Results Raw sPTB recurrence rates were higher among those treated versus not treated; after propensity score matching, no association was detected (26.3 vs. 23.8%, RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.9–1.4). Conclusion We failed to identify a beneficial effect of 17-OHP for the prevention of spontaneous recurrent preterm birth in our observational, U.S. based cohort. Key Points We observed higher risk for sPTB in the group receiving 17-OHP in the unmatched analysis After propensity-score matching, we still failed to identify a beneficial effect of 17-OHP on sPTB Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness to the inclusion criteria and modeling assumptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our objective was to compare rates of hospitalizations for respiratory illnesses in preterm and full-term (FT) children for 4 years before and after the 2014 update to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis guidance, which restricted eligibility among infants born at 29 to 34 weeks in the first winter and all preterm infants in the second winter after neonatal discharge., Study Design: We conducted pre-post and interrupted time series analyses on claims data from a commercial national managed care plan. We compared the number of RSV and all respiratory hospital admissions in the first and second RSV seasons after neonatal discharge among a cohort of preterm children, regardless of palivizumab status, in the 4 years before and after the implementation of the 2014 palivizumab eligibility change. A FT group was included for reference., Results: The cohort included 821 early preterm (EP, <29 weeks), 4,790 moderate preterm (MP, 29-34 weeks), and 130,782 FT children. Palivizumab use after the policy update decreased among MP children in the first and second RSV seasons after neonatal discharge, without any change in the odds of hospitalization with RSV or respiratory illness. For the EP group, there was no change in the rate of palivizumab or the odds of hospitalization with RSV or respiratory illness after the policy update. For the FT group, there was a slight decrease in odds of hospitalization post-2014 after the policy update. The interrupted time series did not reveal any secular trends over time in hospitalization rates among preterm children. Following the policy change, there were cost savings for MP children in the first and second RSV seasons, when accounting for the cost of hospitalizations and the cost of palivizumab., Conclusion: Hospitalizations for RSV or respiratory illness did not increase, and cost savings were obtained after the implementation of the 2014 AAP palivizumab prophylaxis policy., Key Points: · Palivizumab use decreased among children born moderate preterm (29 to34 weeks) after the 2014 palivizuamb policy update.. · There was no change in odds of hospitalization with respiratory syncitial virus or respiratory illness among preterm infants after the policy update when compared to before.. · There were cost savings, when accounting for the cost of hospitalizations and the cost of palivizumab, after the policy update among children born moderate preterm.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)