Search

Objective. To assess the impact of a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) capstone project on students’ ability to conduct research and quality improvement, and to assess the feasibility of requiring projects in the core curriculum. Methods. Project proposals were solicited from faculty members and local colleagues, and students matched with an individual project and mentor. After developing a written research proposal in their third professional year, students completed the project with mentor oversight in their third and fourth professional years, culminating with a poster session and completion of a manuscript prior to graduation. Students’ knowledge of biostatistics, research confidence, and attitudes regarding research were evaluated using a validated survey instrument. Students and mentors were surveyed for feedback, and students’ publications and presentations were tracked. Results. Sixty-one students (97%) completed their projects on time. Students’ confidence in their ability to understand and participate in research increased, but improvement in statistical knowledge and interest in conducting future research projects was minimal. Fifty-eight percent of students presented posters at national conferences. Thirteen (21%) published manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals. Students and mentors responded positively overall about the program and the associated time requirements. Conclusion. Requiring PharmD students to complete a capstone project prior to graduation was feasible and increased student confidence in their ability to participate in research and the number of student and faculty poster presentations and peer-reviewed publications. These findings support the consideration of the Academy that analysis, synthesis, and creation of new knowledge can be successfully implemented into the core PharmD curricula.

Health care in the US remains dysfunctional despite well-intentioned efforts to revitalize the system. Delivery is fragmented, per capita investment is the highest of any nation in the world, and the return on the health care dollar ranks as one of the lowest of industrialized nations.[1-3][1]

Objective. To model the relationship of common pharmacy education assessment data including student demographics, pre-pharmacy performance, core didactic performance, and external testing measures to identify predictors of student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Methods. The associations between 23 predictive covariates from 226 graduating students from 2015-2018 (5786 observations) and APPE readiness as measured by midpoint core APPE scores were modeled. Multiple linear and Poisson regression models with backward selection were used. A selection criterion of p >.10 was used for covariate elimination from the model. Three models were evaluated: average of all midpoint core APPE rotation scores; average of midpoint acute care pharmacy practice and ambulatory care APPE rotation scores; and number of midpoint core clerkship failing scores. Results. The average age of the population at admission was 25.4±4.5 years, 47% were female, and 75.2% had prior degrees. Across the three prediction models, knowledge-retention covariates were the strongest predictors. Total score on the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment was a modest yet consistent predictor across the models. All other significant predictors were unique to the various models. Conclusion. This four-year, population-based modeling study of the relationship of common pharmacy education assessment data to APPE midpoint scores shows a modest correlation with knowledge-based measures. There is a need for greater innovation in this area of research.