Search

Objective: Regulation of postprandial (pp) plasma glucose excursions is complex. Insulin and glucagon are thought to play the predominant role. Nevertheless, only 50% of the variation in pp plasma glucose excursions is explained by variations by the latter. Theoretically, gastric emptying (GE) should be another important factor. However, its impact on pp glucose homeostasis is unknown., Research Design and Methods: We examined the consequences of pramlintide-induced delay in GE on pp glycemia and glucose fluxes, determined isotopically. GE was recorded by scintigraphy. Fourteen healthy subjects (8 men, 6 women; age 40 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 27.8 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) ate a mixed meal, and 30 microg of pramlintide (PRAM) or placebo (PBO) were injected subcutaneously., Results: At 60 min, greater proportions of the initial gastric contents remained in the stomach (PBO vs. PRAM). Thereafter, GE slopes paralleled until 240 min. Fifty percent retention times were lower when PBO was given (P < 0.001). GE was greater from 240 min to the end of the PRAM experiments, so that only slightly greater proportions of the meal remained in the stomach at 330 min. Reductions of GE lowered pp glucose (7.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 6.0 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, P < 0.001), even though plasma insulin was lower with PRAM (164 +/- 13 vs. 138 +/- 13 pmol/ml, both P < 0.01). Reduction in total glucose appearance (P < 0.001) was due to reduced meal-derived glucose appearance (10.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.4 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.001). Endogenous glucose appearance was greater with PRAM (P < 0.001). Splanchnic glucose uptake was greater with PRAM (26.5 +/- 1.6 vs. 32.5 +/- 2.1%, P = 0.014)., Conclusions: These data support the concept that GE is an important physiological regulator of pp glucose homeostasis in humans.

To assess mechanisms for postprandial hyperglycemia, we used a triple-isotope technique ([\3-(3)H]glucose and [(14)C]bicarbonate and oral [6,6-dideutero]glucose iv) and indirect calorimetry to compare components of glucose release and pathways for glucose disposal in 26 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 15 age-, weight-, and sex-matched normal volunteers after a standard meal. The results were as follows: 1) diabetic subjects had greater postprandial glucose release (P<0.001) because of both increased endogenous and meal-glucose release; 2) the greater endogenous glucose release (P<0.001) was due to increased gluconeogenesis (P<0.001) and glycogenolysis (P=0.01); 3) overall tissue glucose uptake, glycolysis, and storage were comparable in both groups (P>0.3); 4) glucose clearance (P<0.001) and oxidation (P=0.004) were reduced, whereas nonoxidative glycolysis was increased (P=0.04); and 5) net splanchnic glucose storage was reduced by approximately 45% (P=0.008) because of increased glycogen cycling (P=0.03). Thus in type 2 diabetes, postprandial hyperglycemia is primarily due to increased glucose release; hyperglycemia overcomes the effects of impaired insulin secretion and sensitivity on glucose transport, but intracellular defects persist so that pathways of glucose metabolism are abnormal and glucose is shunted away from normal sites of storage (e.g., liver and muscle) into other tissues.

Recent studies indicate an important role of the kidney in postprandial glucose homeostasis in normal humans. To determine its role in the abnormal postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we used a combination of the dual-isotope technique and net balance measurements across kidney and skeletal muscle in 10 subjects with T2DM and 10 age-, weight-, and sex-matched nondiabetic volunteers after ingestion of 75 g of glucose. Over the 4.5-h postprandial period, diabetic subjects had increased mean blood glucose levels (14.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.2 mM, P < 0.001) and increased systemic glucose appearance (100.0 +/- 6.3 vs. 70.0 +/- 3.3 g, P < 0.001). The latter was mainly due to approximately 23 g greater endogenous glucose release (39.8 +/- 5.9 vs. 17.0 +/- 1.8 g, P < 0.002), since systemic appearance of the ingested glucose was increased by only approximately 7 g (60.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 53.0 +/- 2.2 g, P < 0.02). Approximately 40% of the diabetic subjects' increased endogenous glucose release was due to increased renal glucose release (19.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 10.6 +/- 2.4 g, P < 0.05). Postprandial systemic tissue glucose uptake was also increased in the diabetic subjects (82.3 +/- 4.7 vs. 69.8 +/- 3.5 g, P < 0.05), and its distribution was altered; renal glucose uptake was increased (21.0 +/- 3.5 vs. 9.8 +/- 2.3 g, P < 0.03), whereas muscle glucose uptake was normal (18.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 25.9 +/- 3.3 g, P = 0.16). We conclude that, in T2DM, 1) both liver and kidney contribute to postprandial overproduction of glucose, and 2) postprandial renal glucose uptake is increased, resulting in a shift in the relative importance of muscle and kidney for glucose disposal. The latter may provide an explanation for the renal glycogen accumulation characteristic of diabetes mellitus as well as a mechanism by which hyperglycemia may lead to diabetic nephropathy.

Splanchnic and renal net balance measurements indicate that lactate and glycerol may be important precursors for epinephrine-stimulated gluconeogenesis (GNG) in liver and kidney, but the effects of epinephrine on their renal and hepatic conversion to glucose in humans have not yet been reported. We therefore used a combination of renal balance and isotopic techniques in nine postabsorptive volunteers to measure systemic and renal GNG from these precursors before and during a 3-h infusion of epinephrine (270 pmol. kg-1. min-1) and calculated hepatic GNG as the difference between systemic and renal rates. During infusion of epinephrine, renal and hepatic GNG from lactate increased 4- to 6-fold and accounted for approximately 85 and 70% of renal and hepatic glucose release, respectively, at the end of study; renal and hepatic GNG from glycerol increased approximately 1.5- to 2-fold and accounted for approximately 7-9% of renal and hepatic glucose release at the end of study. The increased renal GNG from lactate and glycerol was due not only to their increased renal uptake (approximately 3.3- and 1.4-fold, respectively) but also increased renal gluconeogenic efficiency (approximately 1.8- and 1.5-fold). The increased renal uptake of lactate and glycerol was wholly due to their increased arterial concentrations, since their renal fractional extraction remained unchanged and renal blood flow decreased. We conclude that 1) lactate is the predominant precursor for epinephrine-stimulated GNG in both liver and kidney, 2) hepatic and renal GNG from lactate and glycerol are similarly sensitive to stimulation by epinephrine, and 3) epinephrine increases renal GNG from lactate and glycerol by increasing substrate availability and the gluconeogenic efficiency of the kidney.

To characterize postprandial glucose disposal more completely, we used the tritiated water technique, a triple-isotope approach (intravenous [3-H(3)]glucose and [(14)C]bicarbonate and oral [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose) and indirect calorimetry to assess splanchnic and peripheral glucose disposal, direct and indirect glucose storage, oxidative and nonoxidative glycolysis, and the glucose entering plasma via gluconeogenesis after ingestion of a meal in 11 normal volunteers. During a 6-h postprandial period, a total of approximately 98 g of glucose were disposed of. This was more than the glucose contained in the meal ( approximately 78 g) due to persistent endogenous glucose release ( approximately 21 g): splanchnic tissues initially took up approximately 23 g, and an additional approximately 75 g were removed from the systemic circulation. Direct glucose storage accounted for approximately 32 g and glycolysis for approximately 66 g (oxidative approximately 43 g and nonoxidative approximately 23 g). About 11 g of glucose appeared in plasma as a result of gluconeogenesis. If these carbons were wholly from glucose undergoing glycolysis, only approximately 12 g would be available for indirect pathway glycogen formation. Our results thus indicate that glycolysis is the main initial postprandial fate of glucose, accounting for approximately 66% of overall disposal; oxidation and storage each account for approximately 45%. The majority of glycogen is formed via the direct pathway ( approximately 73%).