Search

Background: Clinical studies of shoulder dislocations typically include adult patients (>16 years of age). Only small case series of patients aged 10 to 16 years are available to guide management., Purpose: Using a cohort of patients aged 10 to 16 years, this study sought to determine (1) the incidence density rate (IDR) of primary anterior shoulder dislocations requiring closed reduction (CR) and (2) the rate of and risk factors for repeat shoulder CR., Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2., Methods: With use of administrative databases, patients aged 10 to 16 years who underwent CR of a primary anterior shoulder dislocation in Ontario, Canada, between April 2002 and September 2010 were gathered. IDRs for the entire cohort and demographic subgroups were calculated. The main outcome, repeat shoulder CR, was sought until September 2012. The cumulative incidence of repeat CR was calculated at multiple time points for the entire cohort and age subgroups. A competing risk model identified risk factors for repeat CR (reported as hazard ratios [HRs] with 95% CIs)., Results: There were 1937 patients aged 10 to 16 years who underwent primary CR (median age, 15.0 years; 79.7% male). The incidence of primary CR was highest among male patients aged 16 years (164.4 per 100,000 person-years), but primary dislocations were rare in 10- to 12-year-old children (n = 115; 5.9% of all dislocations). Repeat CR was observed in 740 patients (38.2%) after a median of 0.8 years; however, the rate of repeat CR was age dependent: it was highest among 14- to 16-year-old patients (37.2%-42.3%) and considerably lower among 10- to 13-year-old patients (0%-25.0%). Male sex (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.0-1.5]; P = .04) and older patient age (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.3]; P < .001) significantly increased the odds of repeat CR., Conclusion: Among 14- to 16-year-old patients, the rate of primary and recurrent shoulder CR mirrors that of high-risk adults (17-20 years of age) from previously published data; however, the rate of shoulder CR (primary or recurrent) is considerably lower among 10- to 13-year-olds. In addition to older patient age, male sex increased the odds of repeat shoulder CR. Going forward, clinicians should counsel male patients and those aged 14 to 16 years regarding their increased risk of recurrence after the nonoperative management of a primary anterior shoulder dislocation., (© 2015 The Author(s).)

Background: There is a lack of high-quality population-based literature describing the epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocation., Purpose: To (1) calculate the incidence density rate (IDR) of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction (CR; "index event") in the general population and demographic subgroups, and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for repeat shoulder CR., Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2., Methods: All patients who underwent shoulder CR by a physician in Ontario between April 2002 and September 2010 were identified with administrative databases. Exclusion criteria included age <16 and >70 years, posterior dislocation, and prior shoulder dislocation or surgery. Index event IDR was calculated for all populations/subgroups, and IDR comparisons were made. Repeat shoulder CR was sought until September 2012. Risk factors for repeat shoulder CR were identified with a Prentice, Williams, and Peterson proportional hazards model., Results: There were 20,719 persons (median age, 35 years; 74.3% male) who underwent a shoulder CR after a primary anterior shoulder dislocation (23.1/100,000 person-years). The IDR was highest among young males (98.3/100,000 person-years). A total of 3940 (19%) patients underwent repeat shoulder CR after a median of 0.9 years, of which 41.7% were ≤20 years of age. Less than two-thirds of all first repeat shoulder CR events occurred within 2 years; in fact, 95% occurred within 5 years. The risk of repeat shoulder CR was lowest if the primary reduction had been performed by an orthopaedic surgeon (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.90; P = .002) or was associated with a humeral tuberosity fracture (HR, 0.71; CI, 0.53, 0.95; P = .02). Older age (HR, 0.97; CI, 0.97, 0.98; P < .0001) and higher medical comorbidity score (HR, 0.92; CI, 0.87, 0.98; P = .009) were also protective. Risk was highest among males (HR, 1.26; CI, 1.16, 1.36; P < .0001) and patients from low-income neighborhoods (HR, 1.23; CI, 1.13, 1.34; P < .0001)., Conclusion: Young male patients have the highest incidence of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring CR and the greatest risk of repeat shoulder CR. Patient, provider, and injury factors all influence repeat shoulder CR risk. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocation will aid management decisions and injury prevention initiatives.

Background: Factors contributing to recurrent dislocation, revision stabilization, and complications requiring reoperation after an initial shoulder stabilization procedure for instability have not been evaluated on a population level., Purpose: (1) To define the rate of ipsilateral revision stabilization, contralateral primary stabilization, postoperative dislocation, and complications after primary shoulder stabilization in a population cohort. (2) To understand which risk factors among patient, surgical, and provider factors influence these outcomes., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: All residents of Ontario, Canada, aged 16 to 60 years undergoing primary shoulder stabilization between July 2003 and December 2008 were identified from billing and hospital databases. Separate Cox proportional hazards survivorship models were built for the outcomes revision stabilization and postoperative physician-documented shoulder relocation (minimum 2-year follow-up). Model covariates included patient demographics (age, sex, preoperative dislocations), provider characteristics (surgeon volume, hospital academic status), and type of surgery (open, arthroscopic). The frequency and risk factors for contralateral stabilization were identified., Results: A total of 5904 patients (80.6% male; median age, 29 years) were identified. Arthroscopic stabilization was used in ~60% of cases in 2003, increasing to ~80% in 2008. The rates of postoperative dislocation were 6.9%, revision stabilization 4%, and contralateral primary stabilization 3.9%. Patients aged younger than 20 years had a 7.7% revision rate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-4.2; P < .0001) and a 12.6% rate of postoperative physician-documented dislocation (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.8-3.4; P < .0001), compared with 2.8% and 5.5%, respectively, in patients 29 years old (median cohort age). Patients with 3 or more preoperative dislocations in Ontario had an increased risk of revision (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5-3.0; P < .0001) and postoperative dislocation (HR, 10.6; 95% CI, 8.1-14.0; P < .0001). Revision was more common after arthroscopic (4.3%) compared with open (3.5%) stabilization (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02-1.98; P = .04). No provider factor was predictive, including surgeon volume. Reoperation rate for complications not related to recurrent instability was 0.23% (infection, 0.07%; manipulation under anesthesia, 0.15%)., Conclusion: The risks of revision stabilization and postoperative (either shoulder) dislocation were most influenced by young age (<20 years) and having had 3 or more preoperative dislocations. Complications requiring surgery are rare.