1. Localized pancreatic cancer with positive peritoneal cytology as a sole manifestation of metastatic disease: a single-institution experience.
- Author
-
Oh SY, Edwards A, Mandelson MT, Hahn H, Alseidi A, Biehl T, Kozarek RA, Rocha FG, Helton S, and Picozzi VJ
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma therapy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chemoradiotherapy, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms therapy, Retrospective Studies, Adenocarcinoma mortality, Adenocarcinoma secondary, Pancreatic Neoplasms mortality, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Peritoneum pathology
- Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer patients with positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) as a sole metastatic site are poorly characterized. Whether they behave similarly to other stage IV patients is unknown., Methods: Patients with stage IV disease at our institution between 2003 and 2013 were identified. Inclusion criteria for PPC cohort were PPC at laparoscopy and no laparoscopic and/or radiographic evidence of metastasis. Patients with gross metastasis had laparoscopic and/or radiographic evidence of metastasis., Results: Among 308 patients, 43 patients had PPC and 265 had gross metastasis. PPC cohort: 3 (7%) resectable, 8 (19%) borderline resectable, and 32 (74%) unresectable tumor. Disease progression occurred in 37 (86%). Sixteen of 43 (37%) also received local therapy (1 surgery and 15 chemoradiation). PPC vs gross metastasis cohort differed as follows: baseline Ca 19-9 (440 vs 1,904 IU/mL, P < .0001); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤1 (98 vs 88%, P = .04); median overall survival (13.9 vs 9.4 months, P = .0001)., Conclusions: Patients with PPC failed to display long-term disease-free survival, although overall survival was superior compared with those with gross metastasis. Patients with PPC may need to be considered a specific subgroup for staging and survival analysis., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF