1. Critical Appraisal of Histologic Grading for Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: Is an Objective Prognostic 2-tiered Grading System Possible?
- Author
-
Xu B, Alzumaili B, Furlan KC, Martinez GH, Cohen M, Ganly I, Ghossein RA, and Katabi N
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Aged, Young Adult, Adolescent, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Neoplasm Staging, Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid pathology, Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid mortality, Salivary Gland Neoplasms pathology, Salivary Gland Neoplasms mortality, Neoplasm Grading, Lymphatic Metastasis
- Abstract
Multiple 3-tiered grading systems exist for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), leading to controversial results on the frequency and prognostic values of each grade. We aimed to identify prognostic histologic factors and to evaluate grading schemes in this retrospective study of 262 resected primary head and neck MECs. The rate of nodal metastasis was 8.4%. Large tumor size, tumor fibrosis, infiltrative border, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, atypical mitosis, mitotic index (MI) ≥4/2 mm 2 (4/10 HPFs), necrosis, and pT4 stage were associated with increased risk of nodal metastasis. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95%. Significant prognostic factors for RFS included infiltrative border, tumor-associated lymphoid stroma, architectural patterns (macrocystic, microcystic, and noncystic), anaplasia, atypical mitosis, MI, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, margin, pT stage, and tumor size. Nuclear anaplasia, high mitotic rate, and ≥25% microcystic component were significant independent prognostic factors on multivariate survival analysis. There was no significant difference between low-grade (LG) and intermediate-grade (IG) MECs in terms of risk of nodal metastasis and outcomes using all 4 known grading systems. Rather, high-grade MEC was consistently associated with an increased risk of nodal metastasis at presentation and decreased RFS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) compared with the LG/IG MECs. We therefore recommend simplifying MEC grading to a 2-tiered grading scheme using MI and/or tumor necrosis. Using a 2-tiered grading, high-grade histology independently predict RFS, and is associated with a 25% risk of nodal metastasis, a 5-year RFS of 76%, and a 5-year DMFS of 76%, whereas LG MEC has a nodal metastasis rate of 7.0%, 5-year RFS of 97% and 5-year DMFS of 99%., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: Supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant of the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA008748. The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF