793 results
Search Results
2. But the Reviewers Are Making Different Criticisms of My Paper!: Diversity and Uniqueness in Reviewer Comments
3. Poster Presenters: Send Us Your Papers
4. But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments
5. Evaluation of the contributed paper presentations at RMPA: 1975–1976
6. Reification in Sampsonʼs paper
7. Tilting at the paper mills of academe
8. PhD Recipients in Psychology and Biology: Do Those With Dissertation Advisors of the Same Sex Publish Scholarly Papers More Frequently?
9. We Need Research on What Constitutes Good Journal Papers—and Good Editing—Not Guesswork on How to Improve Manuscripts!
10. The external validity of papers on external validity
11. The Peromyscus Papers: Through a Glass, Darkly
12. The Peromyscus papers: Through a looking glass
13. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the Legislative Year 2006: Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Council of Representatives, February 17-19, 2006, Washington, DC; and August 17 and 21, 2006, New Orleans, LA; and Minutes of the February, June, August, and December 2006 Meetings of the Board of Directors
14. Poster presenters: Send us your papers.
15. Call for Papers on the COVID-19 Pandemic: With a Rapid Review Process.
16. Call for Papers for a Special Issue of American Psychologist: Public Psychology: Cultivating Socially Engaged Science for the 21st Century.
17. Call for Papers: Psychological Perspectives on Culture Change.
18. Call for Papers: Rendered Invisible: Are Asian Americans a Model or Marginalized Minority?
19. Call for Papers: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Translation to Action.
20. Call for Papers: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Translation to Action.
21. Call for Papers: Rendered Invisible: Are Asian Americans a Model or Marginalized Minority?
22. Poster presenters: Send us your papers
23. Call for Papers for an American Psychologist Special Issue—Multidisciplinary Research Teams: Psychologists Helping to Solve Real-World Problems.
24. 2011 Reports of the Regional Associations
25. Award for Distinguished Senior Career Contributions to Psychology in the Public Interest: Beverly Greene
26. Cynthia J. Najdowski: Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman Graduate Research Award
27. PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently?
28. Tilting at the paper mills of academe
29. Statement on the Disclosure of Test Data.
30. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the Legislative Year 2009: Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Council of Representatives and Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Directors
31. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the Legislative Year 2008: Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Council of Representatives and Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Directors
32. 2006 Annual Report of the American Psychological Association
33. The Peromyscus papers: Through a looking glass
34. Psychology and Health: Research, Practice, and Policy
35. We need research on what constitutes good journal papers--and good editing--not guesswork on how to improve manuscriptsp.
36. Reification in Sampson's paper.
37. PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently?
38. The external validity of papers on external validity.
39. "PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently?": Reply to Sugar and Tracy and to Primack and O'Leary.
40. "PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently?": Reply to Sugar and Tracy and to Primack and O'Leary.
41. Tilting at the paper mills of academe.
42. Evaluation of the contributed paper presentations at RMPA: 1975-1976.
43. The external validity of papers on external validity
44. Reification in Sampson's paper
45. We need research on what constitutes good journal papers—and good editing—not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts!
46. Evaluation of the contributed paper presentations at RMPA: 1975–1976
47. The Peromyscus papers: Through a glass, darkly
48. 'PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently?': Reply to Sugar and Tracy and to Primack and O'Leary
49. Call for Papers: Special Issue of Psychology of Violence on Co-Occurrence of Different Forms of Violence.
50. Call for Papers: Special Issue of Experimental Issue of Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology on Recent Advances in Psychopharmacology and Mental Health.
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.