1. Significance of false-positive serologic tests for histoplasmosis and blastomycosis in an endemic area.
- Author
-
Jordan MM, Chawla J, Owens MW, and George RB
- Subjects
- Blastomycosis diagnosis, False Positive Reactions, Female, Histoplasmosis diagnosis, Humans, Immunodiffusion, Louisiana epidemiology, Lung Diseases, Fungal diagnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Radioimmunoassay, Blastomycosis epidemiology, Histoplasmosis epidemiology, Lung Diseases, Fungal epidemiology
- Abstract
False-positive serologic tests for histoplasmosis (H) and blastomycosis (B) are common in populations from endemic areas. In order to determine the significance of false-positive test results, we reviewed the final diagnoses of all patients whose sera were submitted to our laboratory for radioimmunoassay (RIA) and immunodiffusion (ID) during a 3-yr period. Of the 263 patients whose sera were examined, 29 (11%) had H or B; 41 (17.5%) of the remaining 234 patients had false-positive test results. Of these 41 patients, 31 were positive for H alone, and 10 had antibodies to both H and B. All three patients with false-positive ID tests for histoplasmosis also had positive titers (greater than or equal to 1:16) on RIA. No patient had a false-positive ID result for blastomycosis. The percentage of patients in each of five major diagnostic categories with and without false-positive serologic tests was similar (p greater than 0.05). The majority of patients had pulmonary infections, almost half of which were granulomatous infections other than H or B; this reflects the clinical indications for requesting fungal serologic tests. A positive fungal serology is not useful in suggesting the presence of a pulmonary disease other than H or B in patients from an endemic area suspected of having a pulmonary mycosis.
- Published
- 1990
- Full Text
- View/download PDF