1. CRASS CONFLICT: A REPLY TO LAUDERDALE AND LARSON.
- Author
-
Hagan, John and Leon, Jeffrey
- Subjects
SOCIAL sciences ,CRIMINAL law ,SOCIOLOGISTS ,SOCIOLOGICAL jurisprudence ,SOCIAL conflict ,LAW & the social sciences - Abstract
The article presents a reply to the comments made by sociologists Pat Lauderdale and Gerald Larson on their paper discussing the Marxian conflict and the sociology of law. The authors express their discontent on the comments and clarify that their paper primarily reviewed the conflict-consensus debate and the Marxian perspective on crime and law that has emerged. Lauderdale and Larson are concerned with the conclusion that the version of the Marxian perspective examined in the paper is (1) prone to logical errors, (2) largely unconfirmed, (3) often unconformable and (4) possibly quite frequently false. They argue that the charge that the perspective is unconformable raises the thorny issue of what are considered testable hypotheses within the perspective. It is opined that rather than presenting evidence on this issue, Lauderdale and Larson simply ignore it. Further, in their comments on the paper, Lauderdale and Larson are concerned that the paper has confused the external and internal validity of sociologist Anthony Platt's findings. However, it is Platt, if anyone, who confuses the issue of internal and external validity.
- Published
- 1978
- Full Text
- View/download PDF