Search

Introduction: Trauma patients who develop indications for therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC) present a challenge due to concern for bleeding. Transfusion requirement has been described as a common complication of TAC after trauma but its clinical relevance is unclear., Objective: Determine risk factors for and clinical outcomes associated with transfusion requirement on TAC after trauma., Methods: All trauma patients admitted to an academic urban level I trauma center from January 2010 to August 2020 who received TAC were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data included injury characteristics; TAC indication and timing; transfusions; and interventions. Patients who required transfusion after TAC were compared to those who did not., Results: Eighty-two patients were included. The most common reasons for TAC were deep vein thrombosis (67.1%) and pulmonary embolism (31.7%). Two (2.4%) patients developed gastrointestinal bleeding. One (1.2%) underwent endoscopic intervention. Two patients (4.9%) had intracranial hemorrhage progression. Blood transfusion after TAC initiation was required in 43.9% of patients. Patients who were transfused started TAC more quickly after traumatic injury (5.5 vs 10.0 days, P = .03), had fewer hospital-free days (54 vs 64 days, P < .01), ICU-free days (8.5 vs 16.5 days, P = .01), and higher mortality (13.9% vs 2.1%, P = .04)., Conclusion: Transfusions are common after starting TAC in trauma patients. Requiring transfusion after starting TAC was associated with shorter time from injury to starting TAC, higher mortality, and fewer ICU and hospital-free days.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has historically required perioperative blood transfusion in 40 to 60 per cent of cases. Growing data suggest that transfusions may be deleterious in the surgical patient. We recently initiated a minimal transfusion approach to PD consisting of limited postoperative blood draws, early iron supplementation, changes in surgical technique, and elimination of hemoglobin transfusion triggers. Predictors of perioperative transfusion were analyzed in 130 consecutive patients undergoing PD by a single surgeon between 2008 and 2013, divided into two eras with 65 patients each. Patients in each era were similar with respect to age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, and diagnosis. The transfusion rate for the entire group was 22 per cent. Nonsignificant predictors of perioperative transfusion include American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3 (P = 0.41), vascular resections (P = 0.56), body mass index ≥30 (P = 0.72), and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.89). Significant predictors of transfusion include PD performed in Era 1 as well as preoperative hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL. In Era 1, 38 per cent of patients required transfusion compared with 6 per cent in Era 2 (P < 0.01). Shorter length of stay and a trend toward decreased pancreatic fistulae were seen in Era 2. Transfusions can be almost completely eliminated in PD and this may contribute to improved outcomes.

Previous investigations suggest outcome differences at Level I and Level II trauma centers. We examined use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors at Level I and Level II trauma centers after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its effect on mortality. The 2007 to 2008 National Trauma Databank was reviewed for patients with an indication for ICP monitoring based on Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines. Demographic and clinical outcomes at Level I and Level II centers were compared by regression modeling. Overall, 15,921 patients met inclusion criteria; 11,017 were admitted to a Level I and 4,904 to a Level II trauma center. Patients with TBI admitted to a Level II trauma center had a lower rate of Injury Severity Score greater than 16 (80 vs 82%, P<0.01) and lower frequency of head Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 3 (80 vs 82%, P<0.01). After regression modeling, patients with TBI admitted to a Level II trauma center were 31 per cent less likely to receive an ICP monitor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.69; P<0.01) and had a significantly higher mortality (AOR, 1.12; P<0.01). Admission to a Level II trauma center after severe TBI is associated with a decreased use of ICP monitoring in patients who meet BTF criteria as well as an increased mortality. These differences should be validated prospectively to narrow these discrepancies in care and outcomes between Level I and Level II centers.