Search

Objective: Validated assessment of procedural knowledge and skills with formative remediation is a foundational part of achieving surgical competency. High-fidelity simulation programs provide a unique area to assess resident proficiency and independence, as well as to assist in identifying residents in need of further practice. While several studies have validated the use of simulation to attain proficiency of specific technical skills, few have validated remediation pathways for their trainees objectively. In this descriptive analysis, we review 2 remediation pathways within our simulation training curricula and how these are used in assessments of resident proficiency.Materials and Methods: Two methods of remediation were formulated for use in high-fidelity simulation labs. One remediation pathway was a summative process, where ultimate judgment of resident competency was assessed through intra-operative assessments of a holistic skill set. The second remediation pathway was a formative "coaching" process, where feedback is given at several intervals along the pathway towards a specific technical skills competence. All general surgery residents are enrolled in the longitudinal, simulation curricula.Results: Approximately one-third of surgical residents entered into a remediation pathway for either of the high-fidelity simulation curricula. Both residents and faculty expressed support for the summative and formative remediation pathways as constructed. Residents who entered remediation pathways believed it was a beneficial exercise, and the most common feedback was that remediation principles should be expanded to all residents. Interestingly, faculty demonstrated stronger support for the formative coaching feedback model than the summative assessment model.Conclusions: Through the complementary use of both formative and summative remediation pathways, resident competence can be enriched in a constructive, nonpunitive method for self-directed performance improvement. Both trainees and faculty express high satisfaction with programs explicitly organized to ensure that skills are rated through a standardized process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A hyperkinetic gallbladder is defined as a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan ejection fraction (EF) of >80%. This condition is poorly described, and there is no current consensus on optimal management. The intent of this study was to determine if cholecystectomy improves symptoms in patients with a hyperkinetic gallbladder when compared to those managed nonoperatively and if there were variables predictive of symptom improvement with or without cholecystectomy.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients from 3 academic hospitals in the Atlanta metro area between the years 2006 and 2018. All patients with an EF >80% were included. Following voluntary exclusion patients were contacted by phone. Each patient was administered a questionnaire regarding their surgical history, medical management, and current symptom profile via Otago score. Institutional Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.Results: 4785 HIDA scans were performed, and 194 reported an EF >80% (incidence 15.7%). 96% of these scans were reported as normal by the radiologist. 68 patients were able to be contacted by phone and completed the questionnaire. 18 patients underwent cholecystectomy, and 89% reported that their symptoms attributed to gallbladder disease were no longer present. 50 patients did not undergo cholecystectomy, and alternate diagnoses, medication prescriptions, diet modification, emergency department visits, and Otago score were higher in this cohort.Discussion: Patients who undergo cholecystectomy for a diagnosis of hyperkinetic gallbladder, on average, report improvement in symptoms when compared to patients managed nonoperatively. This study supports the practice of reporting and managing hyperkinetic gallbladders as a pathologic entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]