Search

The article focuses on the utility of Shock Index (SI) in predicting morbidity and mortality in trauma patients transferred from critical access centers to rural level 1 trauma centers. Topics include the calculation and analysis of SI values in different patient cohorts, the correlation between SI and outcomes such as hospital length of stay and mortality, and the comparison of SI values at the transferring facility and upon arrival at the tertiary care facility.

The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients involved in rollover accidents in non-automobile vehicles in a rural level I trauma center. This was a retrospective study including a total of 127 patients over 5 years who were admitted to our level I trauma center following rollover accidents in either of the following: ATV, lawnmower, or tractor. Patients were significantly older in the tractor and lawnmower rollover groups, and patients less than 65 years old were significantly more likely to sustain an injury in a rollover accident when compared to those greater than 65. Patients with extremity fractures secondary to tractor rollovers were more likely to be older, and patients who sustained spinal injuries secondary to tractor rollovers were more likely to be younger. Non-automobile rollovers have the potential to cause traumatic injuries; however, there does not appear to be 1 vehicle type that is more prone to injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idiopathic, non-traumatic, radial artery aneurysms are rare in medical literature. This report presents the case of a 56-year-old man who was incidentally found to have a 1.01 cm × 1.31 cm left radial artery aneurysm during a carpal tunnel workup. The patient had no other aneurysms, nor any known predisposing diseases that could explain his condition. We proceeded with surgical intervention to prevent future complications. We describe the use of a greater saphenous vein interposition graft for the repair of an idiopathic mid-forearm radial artery aneurysm. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery course following repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is variable, with approaches that overlap Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithms. There is no standard algorithm for TCA, with some withholding ACLS protocols given abysmal outcomes. This study aims to assess surgeon practices and attitudes toward resuscitation practices in TCA. Materials and Methods: A 16-question web-based survey was distributed to the membership of a national trauma association. Respondent demographics and management of TCA were analyzed. Chi-squared tests determined statistical significance. Open-ended responses were coded and analyzed inductively. Results: Two hundred and three surveys were completed. 73.4% of respondents reported utilizing ACLS, while 26.6% reported they never utilized ACLS. A statistically significant difference in the performance of ACLS was found based on number of years in practice (P =.025) and the state of practice (P =.006). There was no significant difference in self-reported survival rates or legal, ethical, or interpersonal conflicts. Qualitative data highlighted themes of interpersonal conflict and futility. Discussion: This study shows that one-quarter of respondents never utilize ACLS in TCA. Of those that utilize ACLS, there was variability in the technique, indication, and duration of resuscitation. Despite significant variability in technique, there appears to be similar survival rates and incidence of conflict. The association between years in practice and ACLS use suggests this may represent an emerging change in practice. The low response rate limits generalizability; however, there is significant variability in practice, highlighting a need for evidence-based guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To retrospectively apply the Geriatric Trauma Outcome (GTO) score to the patient population of a rural South Central Appalachian level 1 trauma center and identify the potential utility of the GTO score in guiding goals of care discussions. Methods: Trauma registry data was extracted for 5,627 patients aged 65+ from 2017 to 2021. GTO score was calculated for each patient. Descriptive statistics were calculated for age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), GTO score, receipt of red blood cells, discharge status, and code status. A simple logistic regression model was used to determine the relationship between GTO score and discharge status. The probability of mortality was then calculated using GTO score, and the distribution of code status among patients with ≤50, 51-75%, and >75% probability of mortality was examined. Results: For every 10-point increase in GTO score, odds of mortality increased by 79% (OR = 1.79; P <.001). Patients had an estimated 50% probability of mortality with a GTO score of 156, 75% with 174, and 99% with a score of 234, respectively. Seventeen patients had a GTO score associated with >75% probability of mortality. Of those 17 patients, four retained a full code status. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates that the GTO score is a validated measure in a rural setting and can be an easily calculated metric to help determine a geriatric patient's probability of mortality following a trauma. The results of our study also found that GTO score can be used to inform goals of care discussions with patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]