Search

Acute acalculous cholecystitis remains a diagnostic challenge in critically ill trauma patients. Laboratory studies are nonspecific and associated injuries or mental status changes may mask clinical signs and symptoms. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis. We hypothesized that ultrasound is inadequate as a screening tool for acute acalculous cholecystitis. The abdominal ultrasounds of all patients undergoing evaluation for acute acalculous cholecystitis in a 40-month period at our Level I trauma center were reviewed. Thickened gallbladder wall, pericholecystic fluid and emphysematous gallbladder were considered positive sonographic criteria. Sludge, cholelithiasis, and hydrops were considered suggestive. Patients who did not undergo cholecystectomy had their gallbladders evaluated either during subsequent laparotomy or at autopsy or they were discharged from the hospital without need for intervention. Sixty-two patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent cholecystectomy for presumed acute acalculous cholecystitis. The data revealed a sensitivity of 30 per cent (6/20) and a specificity of 93 per cent (39/42) for ultrasound evaluation. Twenty patients had subsequent hepatobiliary scans [hepato-iminodiacetic acid (HIDA)] with a sensitivity of 100 per cent (12/12) and specificity of 88 per cent (7/8). Our data do not support ultrasound as a reliable routine screening tool for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Despite its convenience as a bedside procedure ultrasound has insufficient sensitivity to justify its use and a more sensitive diagnostic tool should be used.

Severe chest trauma does not independently predict poor outcome in elderly patients. We chose a specific injury, flail chest, to determine whether age factored into outcome of these patients. A retrospective chart review of all trauma admissions to our Level I trauma center between January 1994 and January 1998 sustaining flail chest was undertaken. Sixty-eight patients were identified, but ten patients were excluded because of death on arrival. Fifty-eight patients were included in the study and separated into groups. The first group comprised those under the age of 55 (n = 32) and the second comprised those over age 55 (n = 26). Parameters evaluated were age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), neurologic injury, the need for mechanical ventilation, need for tracheostomy, length of stay, and death. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon t test, chi2, and logistic regression where appropriate. A 95 per cent confidence interval was sought as determinant of significance. Of the 58 surviving patients analyzed there was no significant difference between the groups regarding ISS, length of stay, days on the ventilator, head injury, tracheostomy, or development of pneumonia or adult respiratory distress syndrome. The likelihood of death was shown to increase by 132 per cent for every 10 years starting at the second decade and continuing to the eighth decade of life. The likelihood of death also increased by 30 per cent for each unit increase in ISS. The likelihood of death decreased by 23 per cent for every day survived in the hospital. Blunt chest trauma directly impacts respiratory mechanics. Elderly patients are more likely to have comorbid conditions and less likely to tolerate traumatic respiratory compromise. Age (and its effects on the body) is the strongest predictor of outcome with flail chest and is associated with an increased mortality (P < or = 0.05).

The era of managed care has spawned a national debate over the allocation of health care resources. We hypothesized that routine postjejunostomy jejunogram rarely provides additional clinical information or changes patient management and, therefore, is unwarranted. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 128 consecutive patients undergoing feeding jejunostomy tube insertion between January 1995 and December 1996. All patients had postinsertion jejunograms. Eighty-five (66%) of the jejunograms were performed after operative insertion of the jejunostomy, and 43 (33%) were performed after percutaneous reinsertion of a previously placed jejunostomy. Data extracted from the charts include age, sex, indication for jejunogram, length of time prior jejunostomy was in place at time of reinsertion, and results of jejunogram. There were no patients (0%) with misplaced jejunostomy or extravasation of dye, as noted on jejunogram. There were no management changes implemented as a result of jejunogram readings (P < <0.05). The use of routine jejunogram after operative insertion or reinsertion of a prior jejunostomy that has become dislodged or occluded does not alter patient management, incurs unnecessary costs, and, therefore, is unwarranted.